US4332029A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Automatic alignment system for a digital modem
Assignee: Harris Corp
•
Filing: 1980-05-16
•
Granted: 1982-05-25
•
Expires: 2000-05-16
Abstract
Abstract An automatic alignment system for use in a digital modem, having a performance indicator circuit associated therewith, adjusts the control voltages applied to selected alignment points therein in order to minimize the error indication output of the performance indicator circuit. The alignment system interfaces with a microprocessor and provides the necessary timing mechanism to generate write pulses which control the operation of respective processing circuits associated with the various alignment points in the modem analog unit. Each of the processing circuits in the modem analog unit includes a digital-to-analog converter, a data latch, and an amplifier which processes the output of the microprocessor interface to generate an analog control voltage.
Inventors
- 👤 David K. Campbell
- 👤 Luther L. Crabtree
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-10-24 18:36
CPC Classifications
G; G06; G06F; G06F11/00; G06F11/07; G06F11/0703; G06F11/0751; G06F11/0754; G06F11/076; G01; G01R; G01R17/00; G01R17/02; G01R17/06
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 23
Claim 1
Independent Claim
192 words
For use with a system for controllably operating upon a physical phenomenon wherein said physical phenomenon is subject to being controllably affected at a plurality of locations within said system, and from said system there is provided a measurement of the performance of said system, a method of optimizing said measured performance comprising, for respective ones of said locations, the steps of: (a) adjusting the degree to which said physical phenomenon is controllably affected until, for such adjustment, there is no substantial improvement in said measured performance; (b) establishing a prescribed range of controllably affecting said physical phenomenon about the degree of controllably affecting said phenomenon for which there was no substantial improvement in the measured performance in step (a); (c) adjusting, over said range, the degree to which said physical phenomenon is controllably affected and measuring the performance of said system for each adjustment; (d) comparing the optimum performance measured in step (c) with the optimum performance obtained in step (a); and (e) establishing the degree to which said physical phenomenon is affected in accordance with that degree which produced the optimum one of the measured performances compared in step (d).
Claim 2
Dependent Claim
192 words
For use with a system for controllably operating upon a physical phenomenon wherein said physical phenomenon is subject to being controllably affected at a plurality of locations within said system, and from said system there is provided a measurement of the performance of said system, a method of optimizing said measured performance comprising, for respective ones of said locations, the steps of: (a) adjusting the degree to which said physical phenomenon is controllably affected until, for such adjustment, there is no substantial improvement in said measured performance; (b) establishing a prescribed range of controllably affecting said physical phenomenon about the degree of controllably affecting said phenomenon for which there was no substantial improvement in the measured performance in step (a); (c) adjusting, over said range, the degree to which said physical phenomenon is controllably affected and measuring the performance of said system for each adjustment; (d) comparing the optimum performance measured in step (c) with the optimum performance obtained in step (a); and (e) establishing the degree to which said physical phenomenon is affected in accordance with that degree which produced the optimum one of the measured performances compared in step (d).
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
31 words
A method according to claim 1, wherein step (a) comprises adjusting the degree to which said physical phenomenon is controllably affected in accordance with a prescribed characteristic of said performance measurement.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
135 words
A method according to claim 1, further comprising, for said respective ones of said locations, the steps of (f) establishing said prescribed range of controllably affecting said physical phenomenon about the degree of controllably affecting said phenomenon established in step (e); (g) adjusting, over the range established in step (f), the degree to which said physical phenomenon is controllably affected and measuring the performance of said system for each adjustment; (h) comparing the optimum performance measured in step (g) with the measured performance obtained in response to affecting said physical phenomenon in accordance with the degree about which said range was established in step (f); and (i) establishing the degree to which said physical phenomenon is affected in accordance with that degree which produced the optimum one of the measured performance compared in step (h).
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
37 words
A method according to claim 3, further comprising, for said respective ones of said locations, the step of: (j) repeating step (f), using the degree established in step (i), and steps (g)-(i) a prescribed number of times.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
26 words
A method according to claim 1, wherein said system comprises a signal transmission system and said physical phenomenon corresponds to a signal coupled through said system.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
22 words
A method according to claim 5, wherein said system comprises, at said respective locations, signal modifying elements for controllably modifying said signal.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
26 words
A method according to claim 5, wherein said system comprises, at said respective locations, signal transmission control elements by which said system controllably affects said signal.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
189 words
For use with a data communications device having a plurality of alignment points at each of which a respective control signal is applied for controlling the operation of said device, said device including means for providing a measurement of the performance thereof in response to the application of said respective control signals at said alignment points, a method of optimizing said measured performance comprising, for each of said alignment points, the steps of: (a) adjusting said control signal until, for such adjustment, there is no substantial improvement in measured device performance; (b) establishing a prescribed range of control signal adjustment about the value of said control signal for which there was no substantial improvement in the measured device performance in step (a); (c) adjusting said control signal over said prescribed range and measuring the performance of said device for each value of said control signal; (d) comparing the optimum device performance measured in step (c) with the optimum performance obtained in step (a); and (e) establishing the value of said control signal at that value which produced the optimum one of the measured device performances compared in step (d).
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
189 words
For use with a data communications device having a plurality of alignment points at each of which a respective control signal is applied for controlling the operation of said device, said device including means for providing a measurement of the performance thereof in response to the application of said respective control signals at said alignment points, a method of optimizing said measured performance comprising, for each of said alignment points, the steps of: (a) adjusting said control signal until, for such adjustment, there is no substantial improvement in measured device performance; (b) establishing a prescribed range of control signal adjustment about the value of said control signal for which there was no substantial improvement in the measured device performance in step (a); (c) adjusting said control signal over said prescribed range and measuring the performance of said device for each value of said control signal; (d) comparing the optimum device performance measured in step (c) with the optimum performance obtained in step (a); and (e) establishing the value of said control signal at that value which produced the optimum one of the measured device performances compared in step (d).
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
25 words
A method according to claim 8, wherein step (a) comprises adjusting said control signal in accordance with a prescribed characteristic of said device performance measurement.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
102 words
A method according to claim 8, further comprising, for said locations, the steps of: (f) establishing said prescribed range about the value of said control signal established in step (e); (g) adjusting, over the range established in step (f), said control signal and measuring the performance of said device for each adjustment; (h) comparing the optimum performance measured in step (g) with the measured performance obtained in response to establishing said control signal at the value established in step (e); and (i) establishing said control signal at the value which produces the optimum one of the measured performances compared in step (h).
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
36 words
A method according to claim 10, further comprising, for said respective locations, the steps of (j) repeating step (f), using the control signal value established in step (i) and steps (g)-(i) a prescribed number of times.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
106 words
For use with a system for controllably operating on a physical phenomenon wherein said physical phenomenon is subject to being controllably affected at a plurality of locations within said system, a method of establishing the degree to which said physical phenomenon is controllably affected comprising the steps of: (a) measuring the performance of said system irrespective of prior knowledge of any prescribed characteristic in accordance with which said physical phenomenon is controlled; and (b) adjusting, at respective ones of said plurality of locations within said system, the degree to which said physical phenomenon is controllably affected on the basis of the performance measured in step (a).
Claim 15
Dependent Claim
106 words
For use with a system for controllably operating on a physical phenomenon wherein said physical phenomenon is subject to being controllably affected at a plurality of locations within said system, a method of establishing the degree to which said physical phenomenon is controllably affected comprising the steps of: (a) measuring the performance of said system irrespective of prior knowledge of any prescribed characteristic in accordance with which said physical phenomenon is controlled; and (b) adjusting, at respective ones of said plurality of locations within said system, the degree to which said physical phenomenon is controllably affected on the basis of the performance measured in step (a).
Claim 16
Dependent Claim
34 words
A method according to claim 12, wherein step (b) comprises adjusting the degree to which said physical phenomenon is controllably affected so as to optimize the performance of said system measured in step (a).
Claim 17
Dependent Claim
76 words
A method according to claim 13, wherein step (b) comprises the steps of: (b1) carrying out a coarse adjustment of the degree to which said physical phenomenon is controllably affected so as to improve measured system performance; and (b2) carrying out a fine adjustment of the degree to which said physical phenomenon is controllably affected, relative to a prescribed degree providing improved measured system performance in step (b1), until the performance of said system is optimized.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim
37 words
A method according to claim 14, wherein step (b1) comprises: adjusting the degree to which said physical phenomenon is controllably affected until, for such adjustment, there is no substantial improvement in the performance measured in step (a).
Claim 19
Dependent Claim
114 words
A method according to claim 14, wherein step (b2) comprises: (b2-1) establishing a prescribed range of controllably affecting said physical phenomenon about the degree of controllably affecting said phenomenon for which there was no substantial improvement in the performance measured in step (a); (b2-2) adjusting, over said range, the degree to which said physical phenomenon is controllably affected and measuring the performance of said system for each adjustment; (b2-3) comparing the optimum performance measured in step (b2-2) with the optimum performance obtained in step (a); and (b2-4) establishing the degree to which said physical phenomenon is affected in accordance with that degree which produced the optimum one of the measured performances in step (b2-3).
Claim 20
Dependent Claim
31 words
A method according to claim 16, wherein step (a) comprises adjusting the degree to which said physical phenomenon is controllably affected in accordance with a prescribed characteristic of said performance measurement.
Claim 21
Dependent Claim
26 words
A method according to claim 12, wherein said system comprises a signal transmission system and said physical phenomenon corresponds to a signal coupled through said system.
Claim 22
Dependent Claim
22 words
A method according to claim 18, wherein said system comprises, at said respective locations, signal modifying elements for controllably modifying said signal.
Claim 23
Dependent Claim
26 words
A method according to claim 18, wherein said system comprises, at said respective locations, signal transmission control elements by which said system controllably affects said signal.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US2978647A
Cited
US2978655A
Cited
US3622877A
Cited
US3652938A
Cited
US3842247A
Cited
US3889255A
Cited
US4238779A
Cited
US4197500A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1985-05-24 | 1985-11-23 | 1986-05-25 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 1989-05-24 | 1989-11-23 | 1990-05-25 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 1993-05-24 | 1993-11-23 | 1994-05-25 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |