← Back to Patent Explorer
US4330872A Expired / Lapsed US ⏱️ 0.0 years remaining

Common-offset-distance seismic trace filtering

Assignee: Mobil Oil AS
•
Filing: 1974-09-23
•
Granted: 1982-05-18
•
Expires: 1994-09-23
📄 Original PDF 🌐 Google Patents 🔄 Sync Now

Abstract

Abstract A multiple coverage seismic exploration technique provides for a plurality of seismic trace recordings along a line of exploration. From these recordings, sets of common-offset-distance traces are gathered. Initial estimates are made of the apparent dips associated with the seismic reflection signals across each set of common-offset-distance traces. These initial dip estimates are smoothed and the sets of common-offset-distance traces filtered along the apparent dips associated with the smoothed dip estimates to enhance the signal-to-noise ratio of the primary reflection signals.

Inventors

  • 👤 Robert H. Bratton

Bibliographic Details

Application Number —
Jurisdiction US
Data Source google_patents
Last Synchronized 2026-10-28 11:15
CPC Classifications
G; G01; G01V; G01V1/00; G01V1/28; G01V1/36; G01V1/364

Claims Analysis

Total Claims: 5
Claim 1
Independent Claim 347 words
In seismic exploration wherein a multiple coverage exploration technique is used to obtain seismic traces from source and receiver positions along a line of exploration, the machine implemented method of enhancing the signal-to-noise ratio of said seismic traces, comprising the steps of: (a) gathering said seismic traces into sets having common source-to-receiver offset distances, (b) summing the magnitudes of the absolute values of a selected number of contiguous seismic traces along a first selected orientation for the dip trajectory across the seismic traces of each of said sets to obtain a sum-of-magnitude signal at each of a plurality of first sampling points within a first time window, (c) summing the mutual products of the selected number of contiguous seismic traces along said first selected orientation for the dip trajectory of those portions of all possible trace pairs that lie within said first time window to obtain a cross-product signal for each of said plurality of first sampling points, (d) repeating steps (b) and (c) for a plurality of selected orientations for the dip trajectory, (e) incrementing said first time window along the time axis of said sets of traces and repeating steps (b)-(d) for each subsequent first time window position to obtain a plurality of sum-of-magnitude and cross-product signals, (f) multiplying the sum-of-magnitude and cross-product signals obtained from the same first time window position and the same selected orientation for the dip trajectory to obtain a plurality of merit function signals, (g) selecting the orientation for the dip trajectory associated with the largest value of the merit function signal for each first time window position as the initial dip estimate of the seismic reflection signal at the first sampling point that lies nearest the midpoint of the center trace within such first time window position, (h) smoothing the initial dip estimates for each of said sets of common-offset-distance traces to provide final dip estimates, the influence of erroneous dip estimates being thereby minimized, and (i) filtering said sets of common-offset-distance traces along the apparent dips of the seismic reflection signals as indicated by said final dip estimates.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim 347 words
In seismic exploration wherein a multiple coverage exploration technique is used to obtain seismic traces from source and receiver positions along a line of exploration, the machine implemented method of enhancing the signal-to-noise ratio of said seismic traces, comprising the steps of: (a) gathering said seismic traces into sets having common source-to-receiver offset distances, (b) summing the magnitudes of the absolute values of a selected number of contiguous seismic traces along a first selected orientation for the dip trajectory across the seismic traces of each of said sets to obtain a sum-of-magnitude signal at each of a plurality of first sampling points within a first time window, (c) summing the mutual products of the selected number of contiguous seismic traces along said first selected orientation for the dip trajectory of those portions of all possible trace pairs that lie within said first time window to obtain a cross-product signal for each of said plurality of first sampling points, (d) repeating steps (b) and (c) for a plurality of selected orientations for the dip trajectory, (e) incrementing said first time window along the time axis of said sets of traces and repeating steps (b)-(d) for each subsequent first time window position to obtain a plurality of sum-of-magnitude and cross-product signals, (f) multiplying the sum-of-magnitude and cross-product signals obtained from the same first time window position and the same selected orientation for the dip trajectory to obtain a plurality of merit function signals, (g) selecting the orientation for the dip trajectory associated with the largest value of the merit function signal for each first time window position as the initial dip estimate of the seismic reflection signal at the first sampling point that lies nearest the midpoint of the center trace within such first time window position, (h) smoothing the initial dip estimates for each of said sets of common-offset-distance traces to provide final dip estimates, the influence of erroneous dip estimates being thereby minimized, and (i) filtering said sets of common-offset-distance traces along the apparent dips of the seismic reflection signals as indicated by said final dip estimates.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim 127 words
The method of claim 1 wherein said step of smoothing the initial dip estimates comprises the steps of: (a) determining the median value of the initial dip estimates at a plurality of second sampling points that lie within a second time window of said set of traces, (b) replacing the initial dip estimate at the second sampling point that lies nearest the midpoint of the center trace within said second time window with a final dip estimate as represented by the median value determined for that sampling point in step (a), and (c) incrementing said second time window along the time axis of said set of traces and repeating steps (a) and (b) for each second time window position to obtain a plurality of final dip estimates.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim 35 words
The method of claim 2 wherein only the center trace and a selected number of contiguous traces lying on either side of the center trace are utilized in the median value determination of step (a).
Claim 5
Dependent Claim 65 words
The method of claim 2 wherein said second sampling points within said second time window are spaced along the time axis in time increments greater than the spacing of said first sampling points within said first time window and further including the step of selectively replacing the initial dip estimates at said first sampling points with the final dip estimates at said second sampling points.

References Cited (Backward Citations)

US3381266A Cited
US3668620A Cited
US3651451A Cited
US4203161A Cited

USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows

Annuity Stage Window Opens Payment Deadline Surcharge Period Until Estimated Fee Status
3.5 Years (Year 4) 1985-05-17 1985-11-16 1986-05-18 $2000.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
7.5 Years (Year 8) 1989-05-17 1989-11-16 1990-05-18 $3760.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
11.5 Years (Year 12) 1993-05-17 1993-11-16 1994-05-18 $7700.00 Window Closed / Lapsed

Assigned Categories & Tags

No categories assigned to this patent yet.

Assign Category Tag