US4314338A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Method of generating subsurface characteristic models
Assignee: SLB NV
•
Filing: 1979-03-12
•
Granted: 1982-02-02
•
Expires: 1999-03-12
Abstract
Abstract A method of computer generating a subsurface characteristic model which is substantially consistent with readings taken in a well with a well logging device. A set of actual measurement values which represent readings taken over a given depth interval of a well is derived. An initial trial model of the subsurface characteristic under investigation is then selected. Next, a set of simulated measurement values is generated by applying the approximate response characteristic of the logging device to the discrete trial model. The simulated measurement values are compared with the actual measurement values and an error function is generated in accordance with the comparison, the error function reflecting the comparison taken over a substantial portion of the given depth interval. The model is then modified in a manner which tends to minimize the error function.
Inventors
- 👤 Jean Suau
- 👤 William Frawley
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-10-28 23:08
CPC Classifications
G; G06; G06T; G06T17/00; G06T17/05; G01; G01V; G01V3/00; G01V3/38
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 56
Claim 1
Independent Claim
198 words
A well logging method of producing a representation of the vertical arrangement of subsurface earth formation beds with respect to a subsurface characteristic, which representation is substantially consistent with measurements of the characteristic taken in a well in the formation with a well logging device, comprising: (a) deriving a set of initial well logging measurements from the measurements taken in the well with the well logging device over a given depth interval; (b) selecting a trial variation of the subsurface characteristic with depth in the well; (c) generating, by a computer, a set of new well logging measurements by applying the approximate response characteristic of the logging device to the trial variation of the subsurface characteristic; (d) comparing, by a computer, the new well logging measurements to the initial well logging measurements and generating, by a computer, an error function in accordance with said comparison, said error function reflecting the comparison taken over a substantial portion of said given depth interval; and (e) modifying, by a computer, the trial variation in a manner which tends to minimize said error function to produce a visual or a stored record of said representation of the vertical arrangement of subsurface beds.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim
198 words
A well logging method of producing a representation of the vertical arrangement of subsurface earth formation beds with respect to a subsurface characteristic, which representation is substantially consistent with measurements of the characteristic taken in a well in the formation with a well logging device, comprising: (a) deriving a set of initial well logging measurements from the measurements taken in the well with the well logging device over a given depth interval; (b) selecting a trial variation of the subsurface characteristic with depth in the well; (c) generating, by a computer, a set of new well logging measurements by applying the approximate response characteristic of the logging device to the trial variation of the subsurface characteristic; (d) comparing, by a computer, the new well logging measurements to the initial well logging measurements and generating, by a computer, an error function in accordance with said comparison, said error function reflecting the comparison taken over a substantial portion of said given depth interval; and (e) modifying, by a computer, the trial variation in a manner which tends to minimize said error function to produce a visual or a stored record of said representation of the vertical arrangement of subsurface beds.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
65 words
A well logging method as in claim 1 wherein the steps (c) through (e) are repeated a desired number of times in iterative fashion, the modified trial variation of step (e) of each iteration being utilized to generate the set of new well logging measurements of step (c) for the next iteration, and including plotting the representation produced as a result of the last iteration.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
23 words
A well logging method as in claim 1 wherein said trial variation is originally selected from the set of initial well logging measurements.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
23 words
A well logging method as in claim 1 wherein said trial variation includes discretely-boundaried beds, the boundaries being based on subsurface characteristic measurements.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
26 words
A well logging method as in claim 4 wherein said subsurface characteristic measurements on which the trial boundaries are based are said initial well logging measurements.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
20 words
A well logging method as in claim 1 wherein the modification of step (e) is determined by trial and error.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
212 words
A well logging method of producing a representation of the arrangement of subsurface earth formation beds with respect to a subsurface characteristic which representation is substantially consistent with measurements of the subsurface characteristic taken in a well in the formation with a well logging device, comprising: (a) deriving a set of initial well logging measurements from measurements of said subsurface characteristic taken with the well logging device over a given depth interval; (b) selecting a trial variation of the subsurface characteristic with depth in the well; (c) generating, by a computer, a set of new well logging measurements by applying the approximate response characteristic of the logging device to the trial variation; (d) comparing, by a computer, the new well logging measurements to the initial well logging measurements and generating, by a computer, an error function in accordance with said comparison, said error function reflecting the comparison taken over a substantial portion of said given depth interval; (e) determining, by a computer, the gradient direction of said error function; and (f) modifying, by a computer, the trial variation in accordance with said gradient direction in a manner which tends to minimize said error function to thereby produce a visual or a stored record of said representation of the arrangement of subsurface beds.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
212 words
A well logging method of producing a representation of the arrangement of subsurface earth formation beds with respect to a subsurface characteristic which representation is substantially consistent with measurements of the subsurface characteristic taken in a well in the formation with a well logging device, comprising: (a) deriving a set of initial well logging measurements from measurements of said subsurface characteristic taken with the well logging device over a given depth interval; (b) selecting a trial variation of the subsurface characteristic with depth in the well; (c) generating, by a computer, a set of new well logging measurements by applying the approximate response characteristic of the logging device to the trial variation; (d) comparing, by a computer, the new well logging measurements to the initial well logging measurements and generating, by a computer, an error function in accordance with said comparison, said error function reflecting the comparison taken over a substantial portion of said given depth interval; (e) determining, by a computer, the gradient direction of said error function; and (f) modifying, by a computer, the trial variation in accordance with said gradient direction in a manner which tends to minimize said error function to thereby produce a visual or a stored record of said representation of the arrangement of subsurface beds.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
65 words
A well logging method as in claim 7 wherein the steps (c) through (f) are repeated a desired number of times in iterative fashion, the modified trial variation of step (f) of each iteration being utilized to generate the set of new well logging measurements of step (c) for the next iteration, and including plotting the representation produced as a result of the last iteration.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
48 words
A well logging method as in claim 8 wherein, after the last modification of the trial variation, the conjugate gradient direction of the error function is determined during each performance of step (e), and each modifications of step (f) is performed in accordance with said conjugate gradient direction.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
23 words
A well logging method as in claim 7 wherein the magnitude of the modification of step (f) is determined by trial and error.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
52 words
A well logging method as in claim 10 wherein the steps (c) through (f) are repeated a desired number of times in iterative fashion, the modified trial variation of step (f) of each iteration being utilized to generate the set of new well logging measurements of step (c) for the next iteration.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
188 words
A well logging method of computer generating a representation of the arrangement of subsurface earth formation beds with respect to a subsurface characteristic, which representation is substantially consistent with measurements of the subsurface characteristic taken in a well in the formation with a well logging device, comprising: (a) measuring said subsurface characteristic with a well logging device moved through a well in the formation to produce a set of initial well logging measurements over a given depth interval; (b) selecting a trial variation of the subsurface characteristic with depth in the well; (c) generating a set of new well logging measurements by applying the approximate response characteristic of the logging device to the trial variation; (d) comparing the new well logging measurements to the initial well logging measurements and generating an error function in accordance with said comparison, said error function reflecting the comparison taken over a substantial protion of said given depth interval; and (e) modifying the trial variation in a manner which tends to minimize said error function to thereby produce a visual or a stored record of said representation of the arrangement of subsurface beds.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim
188 words
A well logging method of computer generating a representation of the arrangement of subsurface earth formation beds with respect to a subsurface characteristic, which representation is substantially consistent with measurements of the subsurface characteristic taken in a well in the formation with a well logging device, comprising: (a) measuring said subsurface characteristic with a well logging device moved through a well in the formation to produce a set of initial well logging measurements over a given depth interval; (b) selecting a trial variation of the subsurface characteristic with depth in the well; (c) generating a set of new well logging measurements by applying the approximate response characteristic of the logging device to the trial variation; (d) comparing the new well logging measurements to the initial well logging measurements and generating an error function in accordance with said comparison, said error function reflecting the comparison taken over a substantial protion of said given depth interval; and (e) modifying the trial variation in a manner which tends to minimize said error function to thereby produce a visual or a stored record of said representation of the arrangement of subsurface beds.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim
65 words
A well logging method as in claim 12 wherein the steps (c) through (e) are repeated a desired number of times in iterative fashion, the modified trial variation of step (e) of each iteration being utilized to generate the set of new well logging measurements of step (c) for the next iteration, and including plotting the representation produced as a result of the last iteration.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim
23 words
A well logging method as in claim 12 wherein said trial variation is originally selected from the set of initial well logging measurements.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim
23 words
A well logging method as in claim 12 wherein said trial variation includes discretely-boundaried beds, the boundaries being based on subsurface characteristic measurements.
Claim 19
Dependent Claim
25 words
A well logging method as in claim 15 wherein said subsurface characteristic measurements on which the boundaries are based are the initial well logging measurements.
Claim 20
Dependent Claim
20 words
A well logging method as in claim 12 wherein the modification of step (e) is determined by trial and error.
Claim 21
Dependent Claim
198 words
A well logging method of computer generating a representation of the arrangement of subsurface earth formation beds with respect to a subsurface characteristic, which representation is substantially consistent with measurements of the characteristic taken in a well in the formation with a well logging device, comprising: (a) measuring said subsurface characteristic with a well logging device to produce a set of initial well logging measurements over a given depth interval of the well; (b) selecting a trial variation of the subsurface characteristic with depth in the well; (c) generating a set of new well logging measurements by applying the approximate response characteristic of the logging device to the trial varation; (d) comparing the new well logging measurements to the initial well logging measurements and generating an error function in accordance with said comparison, said error function reflecting the comparison taken over a substantial portion of said given depth interval; (e) finding the gradient direction of said error function; and (f) modifying the trial variation in accordance with said gradient direction in a manner which tends to minimize said error function to thereby produce a visual or a stored record of said representation of the arrangement of subsurface beds.
Claim 22
Dependent Claim
198 words
A well logging method of computer generating a representation of the arrangement of subsurface earth formation beds with respect to a subsurface characteristic, which representation is substantially consistent with measurements of the characteristic taken in a well in the formation with a well logging device, comprising: (a) measuring said subsurface characteristic with a well logging device to produce a set of initial well logging measurements over a given depth interval of the well; (b) selecting a trial variation of the subsurface characteristic with depth in the well; (c) generating a set of new well logging measurements by applying the approximate response characteristic of the logging device to the trial varation; (d) comparing the new well logging measurements to the initial well logging measurements and generating an error function in accordance with said comparison, said error function reflecting the comparison taken over a substantial portion of said given depth interval; (e) finding the gradient direction of said error function; and (f) modifying the trial variation in accordance with said gradient direction in a manner which tends to minimize said error function to thereby produce a visual or a stored record of said representation of the arrangement of subsurface beds.
Claim 23
Dependent Claim
65 words
A well logging method as in claim 18 wherein the steps (c) through (f) are repeated a desired number of times in iterative fashion, the modified trial variation of step (f) of each iteration being utilized to generate the set of new well logging measurements of step (c) for the next iteration, and including plotting the representation produced as a result of the last iteration.
Claim 24
Dependent Claim
48 words
A well logging method as in claim 19 wherein, after the first modification of the trial variation, the conjugate gradient direction of the error function is found during each performance of step (e) and each modifications of step (f) is performed in accordance with said conjugate gradient direction.
Claim 25
Dependent Claim
23 words
A well logging method as in claim 18 wherein the magnitude of the modification of step (f) is determined by trial and error.
Claim 26
Dependent Claim
52 words
A well logging method as in claim 21 wherein the steps (c) through (f) are repeated a desired number of times in iterative fashion, the modified trial variation of step (f) of each iteration being utilized to generate the set of new well logging measurements of step (c) for the next iteration.
Claim 27
Dependent Claim
201 words
A well logging method of producing a representation of the arrangement of subsurface earth formation beds with respect to a subsurface characteristic, which representation is substantially consistent with measurements of the characteristic taken in a well in the formation with a well logging device, comprising: (a) deriving a set of initial well logging measurements from the measurements taken with the well logging device over a given depth interval of the well; (b) selecting a discrete trial variation of the subsurface characteristic with depth in the well; (c) programming and operating a computer to generate a set of new well logging measurements by applying the approximate response characteristic of the logging device to the trial variation; (d) programming and operating a computer to compare the new well logging measurements to the initial well logging measurements and to generate an error function in accordance with said comparison, said error function reflecting the comparison taken over a substantial portion of said given depth interval; and (e) programming and operating a computer to modify the trial variation in a manner which tends to minimize said error function to thereby produce a visual or a stored record of said representation of the arrangement of subsurface beds.
Claim 28
Dependent Claim
201 words
A well logging method of producing a representation of the arrangement of subsurface earth formation beds with respect to a subsurface characteristic, which representation is substantially consistent with measurements of the characteristic taken in a well in the formation with a well logging device, comprising: (a) deriving a set of initial well logging measurements from the measurements taken with the well logging device over a given depth interval of the well; (b) selecting a discrete trial variation of the subsurface characteristic with depth in the well; (c) programming and operating a computer to generate a set of new well logging measurements by applying the approximate response characteristic of the logging device to the trial variation; (d) programming and operating a computer to compare the new well logging measurements to the initial well logging measurements and to generate an error function in accordance with said comparison, said error function reflecting the comparison taken over a substantial portion of said given depth interval; and (e) programming and operating a computer to modify the trial variation in a manner which tends to minimize said error function to thereby produce a visual or a stored record of said representation of the arrangement of subsurface beds.
Claim 29
Dependent Claim
58 words
A well logging method as in claim 23 wherein the computer is programmed and operated to repeate the steps (c) through (e) a desired number of times in iterative fashion, the modified trial variation of step (e) of each iteration being utilized to genreate the set of new well logging measurements of step (c) for the next iteration.
Claim 30
Dependent Claim
23 words
A well logging method as in claim 23 wherein said trial variation is originally selected from the set of initial well logging measurements.
Claim 31
Dependent Claim
23 words
A well loggin method as in claim 23 wherein said trial variation includes discretely-boundaried beds, the boundaries being based on subsurface characteristic measurements.
Claim 32
Dependent Claim
26 words
A well logging method as in claim 26 wherein said subsurface characteristic measurements on which the bed boundaries are based are the initial well logging measurements.
Claim 33
Dependent Claim
20 words
A well logging method as in claim 23 wherein the modification of step (e) is determined by trial and error.
Claim 34
Dependent Claim
226 words
A well logging method of producing a representation of the arrangement of subsurface earth formation beds with respect to a subsurface characteristic which representation is substantially consistent with measurements of the characteristic taken in a well in the formation with a well logging device, comprising: (a) deriving a set of initial well logging measurements from the measurements of the characteristic taken with the well logging device over a given depth interval of the well; (b) selecting a discrete trial variation of the subsurface characteristic with depth in the well; (c) programming and operating a computer to generate a set of new well logging measurements by applying the approximate response characteristic of the logging device to the trial variation; (d) programming and operating a computer to compare the new well logging measurements to the initial well logging measurements and to generate an error function in accordance with said comparison, said error function reflecting the comparison taken over a substantial portion of said given depth interval; (e) programming and operating a computer to find the gradient direction of said error function; and (f) programming and operating a computer to modify the trial variation in accordance with said gradient direction in a manner which tends to minimize said error function and to produce a visual or a stored record of thereby said representation of the arrangement of subsurface beds.
Claim 35
Dependent Claim
226 words
A well logging method of producing a representation of the arrangement of subsurface earth formation beds with respect to a subsurface characteristic which representation is substantially consistent with measurements of the characteristic taken in a well in the formation with a well logging device, comprising: (a) deriving a set of initial well logging measurements from the measurements of the characteristic taken with the well logging device over a given depth interval of the well; (b) selecting a discrete trial variation of the subsurface characteristic with depth in the well; (c) programming and operating a computer to generate a set of new well logging measurements by applying the approximate response characteristic of the logging device to the trial variation; (d) programming and operating a computer to compare the new well logging measurements to the initial well logging measurements and to generate an error function in accordance with said comparison, said error function reflecting the comparison taken over a substantial portion of said given depth interval; (e) programming and operating a computer to find the gradient direction of said error function; and (f) programming and operating a computer to modify the trial variation in accordance with said gradient direction in a manner which tends to minimize said error function and to produce a visual or a stored record of thereby said representation of the arrangement of subsurface beds.
Claim 36
Dependent Claim
58 words
A well logging method as in claim 29 wherein the computer is programmed and operated to repeat the steps (c) through (f) a desired number of times in iterative fashion, the modified trial variation of step (f) of each iteration being utilized to generate the set of new well logging measurements of step (c) for the next iteration.
Claim 37
Dependent Claim
48 words
A well logging method as in claim 30 wherein, after the first modification of the trial variation, the conjugate gradient direction of the error function is found during each performance of step (e), and each modifications of step (f) is performed in accordance with said conjugate gradient direction.
Claim 38
Dependent Claim
23 words
A well logging method as in claim 29 wherein the magnitude of the modification of step (f) is determined by trial and error.
Claim 39
Dependent Claim
58 words
A well logging method as in claim 32 wherein the computer is programmed and operated to repeat the steps (c) through (f) a desired number of times in iterative fashion, the modified trial variation of step (f) of each iteration being utilized to generate the set of new well logging measurements of step (c) for the next iteration.
Claim 40
Independent Claim
192 words
A method of computer generating a representation of the arrangement of subsurface earth formation beds with respect to subsurface conductivity, which representation is substantially consistent with electrical conductivity readings taken in a well in the formation with an induction logging device, comprising: (a) deriving a set of initial conductivity well logging measurements from electrical conductivity readings taken over a given depth interval of the well with the induction logging device; (b) selecting a trial variation of the subsurface conductivity with depth in the well; (c) generating a set of new conductivity well logging measurements by applying the approximate response characteristic of the induction logging device to the trial variation; (d) comparing the new conductivity measurements to the initial conductivity measurements and generating an error function in accordance with said comparison, said error function reflecting the comparison taken over a substantial portion of said given depth interval; and (e) modifying the trial variation of conductivity in a manner which tends to minimize said error function to thereby generate a visual or a stored record of said representation of the arrangement of subsurface beds with respect to the electrical conductivity of the subsurface formation.
Claim 41
Independent Claim
192 words
A method of computer generating a representation of the arrangement of subsurface earth formation beds with respect to subsurface conductivity, which representation is substantially consistent with electrical conductivity readings taken in a well in the formation with an induction logging device, comprising: (a) deriving a set of initial conductivity well logging measurements from electrical conductivity readings taken over a given depth interval of the well with the induction logging device; (b) selecting a trial variation of the subsurface conductivity with depth in the well; (c) generating a set of new conductivity well logging measurements by applying the approximate response characteristic of the induction logging device to the trial variation; (d) comparing the new conductivity measurements to the initial conductivity measurements and generating an error function in accordance with said comparison, said error function reflecting the comparison taken over a substantial portion of said given depth interval; and (e) modifying the trial variation of conductivity in a manner which tends to minimize said error function to thereby generate a visual or a stored record of said representation of the arrangement of subsurface beds with respect to the electrical conductivity of the subsurface formation.
Claim 42
Dependent Claim
51 words
A well logging method as in claim 34 wherein the steps (c) through (e) are repeated a desired number of times in iterative fashion, the modified trial variation of step (e) of each iteration being utilized to generate the set of new conductivity measurements of step (c) for the next iteration.
Claim 43
Dependent Claim
22 words
A well logging method as in claim 34 wherein said trial variation is originally selected from the set of initial conductivity measurements.
Claim 44
Dependent Claim
23 words
A well logging method as in claim 34 wherein said trial variation includes discretely-boundaried beds, the boundaries being based on subsurface characteristic measurements.
Claim 45
Dependent Claim
26 words
A well logging method as in claim 37 wherein said subsurface characteristic measurements on which the trial bed boundaries are based are the initial conductivity measurements.
Claim 46
Dependent Claim
20 words
A well logging method as in claim 34 wherein the modification of step (e) is determined by trial and error.
Claim 47
Dependent Claim
196 words
A well logging method of computer generating a representation of the arrangement of subsurface earth formation beds with respect to subsurface conductivity, which representation is substantially consistent with electrical conductivity readings taken in a well in the formation with an induction logging device, comprising: (a) deriving a set of initial conductivity well logging measurements from electrical conductivity readings taken with the induction logging device over a given depth interval of the well; (b) selecting a trial variation of the subsurface conductivity with depth in the well; (c) generating a set of new conductivity well logging measurements by applying the approximate response characteristic of the logging device to the trial variation; (d) comparing the new conductivity measurements to the initial conductivity measurements and generating an error function in accordance with said comparison, said error function reflecting the comparison taken over a substantial protion of said given depth interval; (e) finding the gradient direction of said error function; and (f) modifying the trial variation in accordance with said gradient direction in a manner which tends to minimize said error function to thereby generate a visual or a stored record of said representation of the arrangement of subsurface beds.
Claim 48
Dependent Claim
196 words
A well logging method of computer generating a representation of the arrangement of subsurface earth formation beds with respect to subsurface conductivity, which representation is substantially consistent with electrical conductivity readings taken in a well in the formation with an induction logging device, comprising: (a) deriving a set of initial conductivity well logging measurements from electrical conductivity readings taken with the induction logging device over a given depth interval of the well; (b) selecting a trial variation of the subsurface conductivity with depth in the well; (c) generating a set of new conductivity well logging measurements by applying the approximate response characteristic of the logging device to the trial variation; (d) comparing the new conductivity measurements to the initial conductivity measurements and generating an error function in accordance with said comparison, said error function reflecting the comparison taken over a substantial protion of said given depth interval; (e) finding the gradient direction of said error function; and (f) modifying the trial variation in accordance with said gradient direction in a manner which tends to minimize said error function to thereby generate a visual or a stored record of said representation of the arrangement of subsurface beds.
Claim 49
Dependent Claim
51 words
A well logging method as in claim 40 wherein the steps (c) through (f) are repeated a desired number of times in iterative fashion, the modified trial variation of step (f) of each iteration being utilized to genreate the set of new conductivity measurements of step (c) for the next iteration.
Claim 50
Dependent Claim
48 words
A well logging method as in claim 41 wherein, after the first modification of the trial variation, the conjugate gradient direction of the error function is found during each performance of step (e), and each modifications of step (f) is performed in accordance with said conjugate gradient direction.
Claim 51
Dependent Claim
23 words
A well logging method as in claim 40 wherein the magnitude of the modification of step (f) is determined by trial and error.
Claim 52
Dependent Claim
51 words
A well logging method as in claim 43 wherein the steps (c) through (f) are repeated a desired number of times in iterative fashion, the modified trial variation of step (f) of each iteration being utilized to genreate the set of new conductivity measurements of step (c) for the next iteration.
Claim 53
Dependent Claim
203 words
Apparatus for producing a representation of the arrangement of subsurface earth formation beds with respect to a subsurface characteristic which representation is substantially consistent with measurements of the characteristic taken in a well in the formation with a well logging device, comprising: A. means for: (a) deriving a set of initial well logging measurements from measurements of the characteristic taken with the well logging device over a given depth interval of the well; (b) selecting a trial variation of the subsurface characteristic with depth in the well; (c) generating a set of new well logging measurements by applying the approximate response characterstic of the logging device to the trial variation; (d) comparing the new well logging measurements to the initial well logging measurements and generating an error function in accordance with said comparison, said error function reflecting the comparison taken over a substantial portion of said given depth interval; and (e) modifying the trial variation in a manner which tends to minimize said error function to thereby produce a visual or a stored record of said representation of the arrangement of subsurface beds; and B. means for retaining, at least temporarily, a tangible form of said representation of the arrangement of subsurface beds.
Claim 54
Dependent Claim
203 words
Apparatus for producing a representation of the arrangement of subsurface earth formation beds with respect to a subsurface characteristic which representation is substantially consistent with measurements of the characteristic taken in a well in the formation with a well logging device, comprising: A. means for: (a) deriving a set of initial well logging measurements from measurements of the characteristic taken with the well logging device over a given depth interval of the well; (b) selecting a trial variation of the subsurface characteristic with depth in the well; (c) generating a set of new well logging measurements by applying the approximate response characterstic of the logging device to the trial variation; (d) comparing the new well logging measurements to the initial well logging measurements and generating an error function in accordance with said comparison, said error function reflecting the comparison taken over a substantial portion of said given depth interval; and (e) modifying the trial variation in a manner which tends to minimize said error function to thereby produce a visual or a stored record of said representation of the arrangement of subsurface beds; and B. means for retaining, at least temporarily, a tangible form of said representation of the arrangement of subsurface beds.
Claim 55
Independent Claim
264 words
A method of exploring a subsurface earth formation conprising: (a) producing initial well logging measurements derived from a well logging device passed over a given depth interval through a well in the subsurface earth formation and operated to take said initial measurements of a characteristic of the earth formation adjacent the well at selected depths in the well, said logging device having a selected approximate response characteristic; (b) producing a selected trial variation, with depth in the well, of the characteristic of the subsurface earth formation; (c) generating new well logging measurements for said depths in the well, by applying the approximate response characteristic of the well logging device to said selected trial variation of the characteristic; (d) comparing the new and initial well logging measurements at respective depths in the well, and generating, on the basis of the comparison, an error function reflecting the comparison over a substantial portion of the given depth interval; (e) modifying the selected trial variation in accordance with the error function generated on the basis of the comparison between the new and initial measurements to produce a new selected trial variation capable of yielding further new well logging measurements, conforming more closely to the initial well logging measurements, when the response characteristic of the well logging device is applied to the new selected trial variation; and (f) plotting the new selected trial variation of the measured characteristic of the earth formation versus depth in the well to thereby produce a plot of the arrangement of subsurface earth formation beds with respect to said characteristic of the subsurface formation.
Claim 56
Independent Claim
264 words
A method of exploring a subsurface earth formation conprising: (a) producing initial well logging measurements derived from a well logging device passed over a given depth interval through a well in the subsurface earth formation and operated to take said initial measurements of a characteristic of the earth formation adjacent the well at selected depths in the well, said logging device having a selected approximate response characteristic; (b) producing a selected trial variation, with depth in the well, of the characteristic of the subsurface earth formation; (c) generating new well logging measurements for said depths in the well, by applying the approximate response characteristic of the well logging device to said selected trial variation of the characteristic; (d) comparing the new and initial well logging measurements at respective depths in the well, and generating, on the basis of the comparison, an error function reflecting the comparison over a substantial portion of the given depth interval; (e) modifying the selected trial variation in accordance with the error function generated on the basis of the comparison between the new and initial measurements to produce a new selected trial variation capable of yielding further new well logging measurements, conforming more closely to the initial well logging measurements, when the response characteristic of the well logging device is applied to the new selected trial variation; and (f) plotting the new selected trial variation of the measured characteristic of the earth formation versus depth in the well to thereby produce a plot of the arrangement of subsurface earth formation beds with respect to said characteristic of the subsurface formation.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US3166709A
Cited
US3405349A
Cited
US3457496A
Cited
US3457499A
Cited
US3457497A
Cited
US3457500A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1985-02-01 | 1985-08-03 | 1986-02-02 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 1989-02-01 | 1989-08-03 | 1990-02-02 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 1993-02-01 | 1993-08-03 | 1994-02-02 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |