US4309496A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Method for optimization of image reproduction processes
Assignee: Individual
•
Filing: 1980-09-10
•
Granted: 1982-01-05
•
Expires: 2000-09-10
Abstract
Abstract A method of optimizing reproduction processes including the steps of preparing a physical standard, measuring the filtration and exposure values or densities used in preparing the standard, separating the image used in producing the standard into its color constituents using filtration values that are a function of those employed in making the standard, using a reproduction process to make many replicates of the standard, comparing representative samples of the replicate with the standard upon which the separations were based to measure the average difference in densities between the standard and such replicates, adjusting the filtration used in making the separations in response to such average differences until subsequent comparisons between subsequent standards yield average differences between acceptable, predetermined limits.
Inventors
- 👤 Dennis B. Miller
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-11-01 02:26
CPC Classifications
G; G03; G03F; G03F3/00; G03F3/04
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 15
Claim 1
Independent Claim
108 words
A method for optimization of reproduction processes, including the steps of: (1) producing, from at least one original image, a corresponding physical standard, (2) measuring at least the density values of the filtration employed in producing the physical standard, (3) separating the original image into a corresponding set of separate monotone images using exposure intensity values modified as a function of the filtration values employed in producing the corresponding physical standard, (4) preparing at least one reproduction from the set of separate monotone images, and (5) comparing a representative sampling of the reproductions with its corresponding physical standard to measure at least the average difference in density therebetween.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
108 words
A method for optimization of reproduction processes, including the steps of: (1) producing, from at least one original image, a corresponding physical standard, (2) measuring at least the density values of the filtration employed in producing the physical standard, (3) separating the original image into a corresponding set of separate monotone images using exposure intensity values modified as a function of the filtration values employed in producing the corresponding physical standard, (4) preparing at least one reproduction from the set of separate monotone images, and (5) comparing a representative sampling of the reproductions with its corresponding physical standard to measure at least the average difference in density therebetween.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
43 words
The method according to claim 1, further including the step of: (6) adjusting the exposure intensity values to modify subsequent sets of separate monotone images until the average differences in density from reproductions thereof and their corresponding physical standards fall within predetermined limits.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
45 words
The method according to claim 2, wherein: (7) said step of separating includes the use of additive filtration in the preparation of said separate monotone images, and (8) said step of adjusting the exposure intensity values includes changing the subtractive complements of said additive filtration.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
20 words
The method according to claim 3, wherein: (9) said step of preparing said reproduction includes a printing press reproduction process.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
43 words
The method according to claim 2, further comprising the steps of: (7) selecting from each representative sampling one reproduction that most closely matches its corresponding physical standard, and (8) comparing each of the selected reproductions to determine whether they evidence any common faults.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
52 words
The method according to claim 1, wherein: (6) said step of separating includes the use of additive filtration in the preparation of said sets of separate monotone images, and further comprising the step of: (7) adjusting the subtractive complements of said additive filtration in response to said measured average differences in density.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
35 words
The method according to claim 1, further including the step of: (6) masking said original image using exposure intensity values modified as a function of the filtration values employed in producing said corresponding physical standard.
Claim 9
Independent Claim
84 words
A method for optimization of reproduction processes, including the steps of: (1) separating an image into at least two separate monotone images using filtration, (2) combining said separate monotone images in a reproduction process to produce a replicate of said first mentioned image, (3) measuring at least density differences between said replicate and a corresponding physical standard, and (4) adjusting the filtration values for producing additional separate monotone images in response to said measured differences until said measured density differences fall within predetermined limits.
Claim 10
Independent Claim
84 words
A method for optimization of reproduction processes, including the steps of: (1) separating an image into at least two separate monotone images using filtration, (2) combining said separate monotone images in a reproduction process to produce a replicate of said first mentioned image, (3) measuring at least density differences between said replicate and a corresponding physical standard, and (4) adjusting the filtration values for producing additional separate monotone images in response to said measured differences until said measured density differences fall within predetermined limits.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
25 words
The method according to claim 8, wherein: (5) said step of adjusting includes modifying the complementary values of the filtration employed in separating said image.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
32 words
The method according to claim 8, further including the step of: (5) masking said image employing exposure intensity values modified as a function of the filtration values used in separating said image.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
41 words
The method according to claim 8, wherein: (5) said reproduction process produces a plurality of replicates, and wherein (6) said step of measuring includes measuring said differences between a representative sampling of each of said replicates and said corresponding physical standards.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
43 words
The method according to claim 11, further including the steps of: (7) selecting from each representative sampling one replicate that most closely matches its corresponding physical standard, and (8) comparing each of the selected replicates to determine whether they evidence any common faults.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim
15 words
The method according to claim 12, wherein: (9) said reproduction process comprises a printing press.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1985-01-04 | 1985-07-06 | 1986-01-05 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 1989-01-04 | 1989-07-06 | 1990-01-05 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 1993-01-04 | 1993-07-06 | 1994-01-05 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |