← Back to Patent Explorer
US4297147A Expired / Lapsed US ⏱️ 0.0 years remaining

Method for decoking fired heater tubes

Assignee: Praxair Technology Inc
•
Filing: 1980-04-24
•
Granted: 1981-10-27
•
Expires: 2000-04-24
📄 Original PDF 🌐 Google Patents 🔄 Sync Now

Abstract

Abstract Method of decoking furnace tubes using a turbulent stream of impact resistant, particle-enriched gas. Non-angular, non-abrasive particles are entrained at a concentration of about 0.1 to about 10 pounds per pound of gas, and the gas is introduced into the inlet end of the furnace tubes at a gas flow rate corresponding to an outlet gas velocity of from about 5,000 feet per minute up to sonic velocity of said gas, preferably at an outlet gas velocity of about 14,000 to 40,000 feet per minute.

Inventors

  • 👤 David J. Nunciato
  • 👤 Norman H. White
  • 👤 William A. Woodburn

Bibliographic Details

Application Number —
Jurisdiction US
Data Source google_patents
Last Synchronized 2026-11-01 14:21
CPC Classifications
F; F28; F28G; F28G1/00; F28G1/12; C; C10; C10G; C10G9/00; C10G9/14; C10G9/16; F28G9/00

Claims Analysis

Total Claims: 13
Claim 1
Independent Claim 304 words
A method for decoking fired heater tubes used in hydrocarbon or chemical processing, while maintaining the integrity of the straight sections of tube walls and the return bends of said fired heater tubes, or of said tubes having equivalent continuous helical tube configurations, comprising: (a) establishing a gas inlet to and a gas outlet from said fired heater tubes having straight sections of tube walls and return bends, or equivalent continuous helical tube configurations; (b) injecting a purge gas stream into the inlet while the outlet is open to the atmosphere to purge the tubes of loose debris until the effluent is essentially clear; (c) entraining impact resistant, non-angular, non-abrasive particles into a propelling gas stream at a concentration of from about 0.1 to about 10.0 pounds of particles per pound of propellant; (d) introducing the impact resistant, non-angular, non-abrasive particle entrained gas stream into the inlet of said fired heater tubes having straight sections and return bends, or equivalent continuous helical tube configurations, while the outlet remains open to the atmosphere at a gas flow rate corresponding to an outlet gas velocity of from about 5,000 feet per minute up to the sonic velocity of said propelling gas; (e) maintaining the flow of the gas stream in step (d) for a sufficient time to effect decoking of said tubes; (f) discontinuing the entraining of impact resistant, non-angular, non-abrasive particles into said propelling gas stream; (g) continuing the flow of propelling gas into said tubes to clear such tubes of loose coke debris; and (h) repeating steps (c), (d), (e) and (f) until the tubes are clean, as evidenced by an essentially coke-free clear effluent from the outlet, whereby grinding--type abrasion of the straight sections of tube walls and gouging--type abrasion of the return bends, or of equivalent continuous helical tube configurations, are eliminated.
Claim 2
Independent Claim 304 words
A method for decoking fired heater tubes used in hydrocarbon or chemical processing, while maintaining the integrity of the straight sections of tube walls and the return bends of said fired heater tubes, or of said tubes having equivalent continuous helical tube configurations, comprising: (a) establishing a gas inlet to and a gas outlet from said fired heater tubes having straight sections of tube walls and return bends, or equivalent continuous helical tube configurations; (b) injecting a purge gas stream into the inlet while the outlet is open to the atmosphere to purge the tubes of loose debris until the effluent is essentially clear; (c) entraining impact resistant, non-angular, non-abrasive particles into a propelling gas stream at a concentration of from about 0.1 to about 10.0 pounds of particles per pound of propellant; (d) introducing the impact resistant, non-angular, non-abrasive particle entrained gas stream into the inlet of said fired heater tubes having straight sections and return bends, or equivalent continuous helical tube configurations, while the outlet remains open to the atmosphere at a gas flow rate corresponding to an outlet gas velocity of from about 5,000 feet per minute up to the sonic velocity of said propelling gas; (e) maintaining the flow of the gas stream in step (d) for a sufficient time to effect decoking of said tubes; (f) discontinuing the entraining of impact resistant, non-angular, non-abrasive particles into said propelling gas stream; (g) continuing the flow of propelling gas into said tubes to clear such tubes of loose coke debris; and (h) repeating steps (c), (d), (e) and (f) until the tubes are clean, as evidenced by an essentially coke-free clear effluent from the outlet, whereby grinding--type abrasion of the straight sections of tube walls and gouging--type abrasion of the return bends, or of equivalent continuous helical tube configurations, are eliminated.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim 24 words
The method of claim 1 in which said method is carried out with the fired heater tubes between ambient temperature and process operating temperature.
Claim 4
Independent Claim 23 words
The method of claims 1 or 2 in which said propelling gas is nitrogen, said sonic velocity being about 69,000 feet per minute.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim 21 words
The method of claim 3 in which said outlet gas velocity is from about 14,000 to about 40,000 feet per minute.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim 24 words
The method of claim 3 in which said particle concentration is from about 0.1 to about 1.0 pounds of particles per pound of propellant.
Claim 7
Independent Claim 14 words
The method of claims 1 or 2 in which said particles are steel shot.
Claim 8
Independent Claim 47 words
The method of claims 1 or 2 in which, following purge step (b), the purge gas flow is terminated and the heater tubes allowed to return to atmospheric pressure, whereupon the impact resistant, non-angular, non-abrasive particle entrained gas stream is introduced into the inlet of said tubes.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim 21 words
The method of claim 1 in which said propelling gas is air, said sonic velocity being about 68,000 feet per minute.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim 21 words
The method of claim 8 in which said outlet gas velocity is from about 14,000 to about 40,000 feet per minute.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim 24 words
The method of claim 8 in which said particle concentration is from about 0.1 to about 1.0 pounds of particles per pound of propellant.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim 48 words
The method of claim 10 in which, in step (e), the flow of said gas stream is maintained until the inlet pressure of the tubes reaches a predetermined maximum value corresponding to a minimum inlet velocity for entraining the particles and cleaning the inlet portion of the tubes.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim 31 words
The method of claim 1 in which, in step (e), the flow of said gas stream is maintained until the quantity of particles contained in a particle supply pot is exhausted.

References Cited (Backward Citations)

US1939112A Cited
US2285157A Cited
US3082073A Cited
US3073687A Cited
US3745110A Cited
US4048757A Cited
US4203778A Cited

USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows

Annuity Stage Window Opens Payment Deadline Surcharge Period Until Estimated Fee Status
3.5 Years (Year 4) 1984-10-26 1985-04-27 1985-10-27 $2000.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
7.5 Years (Year 8) 1988-10-26 1989-04-27 1989-10-27 $3760.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
11.5 Years (Year 12) 1992-10-26 1993-04-27 1993-10-27 $7700.00 Window Closed / Lapsed

Assigned Categories & Tags

No categories assigned to this patent yet.

Assign Category Tag