US4297147A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Method for decoking fired heater tubes
Assignee: Praxair Technology Inc
•
Filing: 1980-04-24
•
Granted: 1981-10-27
•
Expires: 2000-04-24
Abstract
Abstract Method of decoking furnace tubes using a turbulent stream of impact resistant, particle-enriched gas. Non-angular, non-abrasive particles are entrained at a concentration of about 0.1 to about 10 pounds per pound of gas, and the gas is introduced into the inlet end of the furnace tubes at a gas flow rate corresponding to an outlet gas velocity of from about 5,000 feet per minute up to sonic velocity of said gas, preferably at an outlet gas velocity of about 14,000 to 40,000 feet per minute.
Inventors
- 👤 David J. Nunciato
- 👤 Norman H. White
- 👤 William A. Woodburn
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-11-01 14:21
CPC Classifications
F; F28; F28G; F28G1/00; F28G1/12; C; C10; C10G; C10G9/00; C10G9/14; C10G9/16; F28G9/00
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 13
Claim 1
Independent Claim
304 words
A method for decoking fired heater tubes used in hydrocarbon or chemical processing, while maintaining the integrity of the straight sections of tube walls and the return bends of said fired heater tubes, or of said tubes having equivalent continuous helical tube configurations, comprising: (a) establishing a gas inlet to and a gas outlet from said fired heater tubes having straight sections of tube walls and return bends, or equivalent continuous helical tube configurations; (b) injecting a purge gas stream into the inlet while the outlet is open to the atmosphere to purge the tubes of loose debris until the effluent is essentially clear; (c) entraining impact resistant, non-angular, non-abrasive particles into a propelling gas stream at a concentration of from about 0.1 to about 10.0 pounds of particles per pound of propellant; (d) introducing the impact resistant, non-angular, non-abrasive particle entrained gas stream into the inlet of said fired heater tubes having straight sections and return bends, or equivalent continuous helical tube configurations, while the outlet remains open to the atmosphere at a gas flow rate corresponding to an outlet gas velocity of from about 5,000 feet per minute up to the sonic velocity of said propelling gas; (e) maintaining the flow of the gas stream in step (d) for a sufficient time to effect decoking of said tubes; (f) discontinuing the entraining of impact resistant, non-angular, non-abrasive particles into said propelling gas stream; (g) continuing the flow of propelling gas into said tubes to clear such tubes of loose coke debris; and (h) repeating steps (c), (d), (e) and (f) until the tubes are clean, as evidenced by an essentially coke-free clear effluent from the outlet, whereby grinding--type abrasion of the straight sections of tube walls and gouging--type abrasion of the return bends, or of equivalent continuous helical tube configurations, are eliminated.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
304 words
A method for decoking fired heater tubes used in hydrocarbon or chemical processing, while maintaining the integrity of the straight sections of tube walls and the return bends of said fired heater tubes, or of said tubes having equivalent continuous helical tube configurations, comprising: (a) establishing a gas inlet to and a gas outlet from said fired heater tubes having straight sections of tube walls and return bends, or equivalent continuous helical tube configurations; (b) injecting a purge gas stream into the inlet while the outlet is open to the atmosphere to purge the tubes of loose debris until the effluent is essentially clear; (c) entraining impact resistant, non-angular, non-abrasive particles into a propelling gas stream at a concentration of from about 0.1 to about 10.0 pounds of particles per pound of propellant; (d) introducing the impact resistant, non-angular, non-abrasive particle entrained gas stream into the inlet of said fired heater tubes having straight sections and return bends, or equivalent continuous helical tube configurations, while the outlet remains open to the atmosphere at a gas flow rate corresponding to an outlet gas velocity of from about 5,000 feet per minute up to the sonic velocity of said propelling gas; (e) maintaining the flow of the gas stream in step (d) for a sufficient time to effect decoking of said tubes; (f) discontinuing the entraining of impact resistant, non-angular, non-abrasive particles into said propelling gas stream; (g) continuing the flow of propelling gas into said tubes to clear such tubes of loose coke debris; and (h) repeating steps (c), (d), (e) and (f) until the tubes are clean, as evidenced by an essentially coke-free clear effluent from the outlet, whereby grinding--type abrasion of the straight sections of tube walls and gouging--type abrasion of the return bends, or of equivalent continuous helical tube configurations, are eliminated.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
24 words
The method of claim 1 in which said method is carried out with the fired heater tubes between ambient temperature and process operating temperature.
Claim 4
Independent Claim
23 words
The method of claims 1 or 2 in which said propelling gas is nitrogen, said sonic velocity being about 69,000 feet per minute.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
21 words
The method of claim 3 in which said outlet gas velocity is from about 14,000 to about 40,000 feet per minute.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
24 words
The method of claim 3 in which said particle concentration is from about 0.1 to about 1.0 pounds of particles per pound of propellant.
Claim 7
Independent Claim
14 words
The method of claims 1 or 2 in which said particles are steel shot.
Claim 8
Independent Claim
47 words
The method of claims 1 or 2 in which, following purge step (b), the purge gas flow is terminated and the heater tubes allowed to return to atmospheric pressure, whereupon the impact resistant, non-angular, non-abrasive particle entrained gas stream is introduced into the inlet of said tubes.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
21 words
The method of claim 1 in which said propelling gas is air, said sonic velocity being about 68,000 feet per minute.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
21 words
The method of claim 8 in which said outlet gas velocity is from about 14,000 to about 40,000 feet per minute.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
24 words
The method of claim 8 in which said particle concentration is from about 0.1 to about 1.0 pounds of particles per pound of propellant.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
48 words
The method of claim 10 in which, in step (e), the flow of said gas stream is maintained until the inlet pressure of the tubes reaches a predetermined maximum value corresponding to a minimum inlet velocity for entraining the particles and cleaning the inlet portion of the tubes.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
31 words
The method of claim 1 in which, in step (e), the flow of said gas stream is maintained until the quantity of particles contained in a particle supply pot is exhausted.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US1939112A
Cited
US2285157A
Cited
US3082073A
Cited
US3073687A
Cited
US3745110A
Cited
US4048757A
Cited
US4203778A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1984-10-26 | 1985-04-27 | 1985-10-27 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 1988-10-26 | 1989-04-27 | 1989-10-27 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 1992-10-26 | 1993-04-27 | 1993-10-27 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |