US4269812A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Horizontal cross-flow scrubber for sulfur oxide removal
Assignee: MW Kellogg Co
•
Filing: 1979-07-27
•
Granted: 1981-05-26
•
Expires: 1999-07-27
Abstract
Abstract Sulfur dioxide removal efficiency of a horizontal cross-flow gas liquid contactor is increased by decreasing the interfering spray density.
Inventors
- 👤 William M. Edwards
- 👤 C. Peter Huang
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-11-05 23:47
CPC Classifications
B; B01; B01D; B01D53/00; B01D53/34; B01D53/46; B01D53/48; B01D53/50; B01D53/501; B01D53/14; B01D53/18
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 7
Claim 1
Independent Claim
122 words
A process for removing sulfur dioxide from industrial waste gas comprising: (a) passing the waste gas substantially horizontally through a horizontal, elongate, gas-liquid contacting zone having a substantially unrestricted flow path, a waste gas inlet at one end, and a cleaned gas outlet at the opposite end; and (b) passing aqueous absorbent through the waste gas within at least a longitudinal portion of the gas-liquid contacting zone in a plurality of interfering cones of spray droplets having an initial Sauter mean diameter of from about 800 to about 2000 microns directed substantially vertically downward wherein the aqueous absorbent has a maximum interfering spray density at any horizontal plane within the longitudinal portion less than about 100 liters per second per square meter.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim
122 words
A process for removing sulfur dioxide from industrial waste gas comprising: (a) passing the waste gas substantially horizontally through a horizontal, elongate, gas-liquid contacting zone having a substantially unrestricted flow path, a waste gas inlet at one end, and a cleaned gas outlet at the opposite end; and (b) passing aqueous absorbent through the waste gas within at least a longitudinal portion of the gas-liquid contacting zone in a plurality of interfering cones of spray droplets having an initial Sauter mean diameter of from about 800 to about 2000 microns directed substantially vertically downward wherein the aqueous absorbent has a maximum interfering spray density at any horizontal plane within the longitudinal portion less than about 100 liters per second per square meter.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
56 words
A process according to claim 1 wherein the interfering cones of spray droplets are formed from distinct, substantially circular cones of spray droplets having an included angle of from about 80 to about 120 degrees and the spray droplets have a Sauter mean diameter of from about 1100 microns to about 4000 microns subsequent to interference.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
48 words
A process according to claim 2 wherein the spray droplets of the distinct cones have an initial velocity of from about 9 to about 21 meters per second and the aqueous absorbent has a residence time in the contacting zone of from about 0.3 to about 1.5 seconds.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
30 words
A process according to claim 2 wherein the aqueous absorbent has a substantially uniform interfering spray density at any horizontal plane within the longitudinal portion of the gas-liquid contacting zone.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
55 words
A process according to claim 1 wherein the waste gas flow rate is from about 50 to about 800 actual cubic meters per second and the aqueous absorbent contains an active compound selected from the group consisting of sodium carbonate, sodium sulfite, and a calcium compound which forms calcium sulfite upon reaction with sulfurous acid.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
60 words
A process according to claim 5 wherein the average relative velocity between the waste gas and the aqueous absorbent is from about 7 to about 14 meters per second and the volumetric flow rate ratio of waste gas to aqueous absorbent within the longitudinal portion is from about 200:1 to about 5000:1 per meter of length of the contacting zone.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1984-05-25 | 1984-11-24 | 1985-05-26 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 1988-05-25 | 1988-11-24 | 1989-05-26 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 1992-05-25 | 1992-11-24 | 1993-05-26 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |