US4269699A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Bioadsorption alteration of iron sulfide surfaces
Assignee: Ministry of Natural Resources and Wildlife
•
Filing: 1979-10-23
•
Granted: 1981-05-26
•
Expires: 1999-10-23
Abstract
Abstract The sulfide surfaces of finely-divided impure iron sulfide-containing minerals such as pyritic ores or coals are rendered hydrophilic by the adsorption of conditioned, inorganic sulfide-oxidizing bacteria. This adsorption of conditioned bacteria occurs in a short time to render the surfaces hydrophilic and allows these altered sulfide particles to be separated from hydrophobic solids by flotation, oil-agglomeration or the like. This bioadsorption process has particular applicability to pyritic coal beneficiation.
Inventors
- 👤 Ronald G. L. McCready
- 👤 Richard D. Coleman
- 👤 Charles E. Capes
- 👤 Alan G. Kempton
- 👤 Nayera A. M. Moneib
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-10-30 21:53
CPC Classifications
B; B03; B03B; B03B1/00; B03B1/04; B03B9/00; C; C10; C10L; C10L9/00; C22; C22B; C22B3/00; C22B3/18; Y; Y02; Y02P; Y02P10/00; Y02P10/20; Y10; Y10S; Y10S423/00; Y10S423/09; Y10S423/17
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 18
Claim 1
Independent Claim
157 words
A process for reducing the sulfur content of impure iron sulfide-containing minerals which include hydrophobic components comprising: (a) subdividing the impure minerals until iron sulfide-containing surfaces are released from non-sulfide hydrophobic solids; (b) conditioning or maintaining bacteria requiring iron for growth and being selected from the Thiobacillus and Ferrobacillus groups, and from recycled said bacteria, in an aqueous medium deficient in iron nutrient, to deplete bacterial iron reserves, thereby causing the bacteria to be in condition to be rapidly adsorbed on fresh iron sulfide surfaces in order to restore depleted nutrient iron; (c) contacting the subdivided mineral solids from (a) with the bacteria from (b) in an aqueous medium for a short time sufficient for adsorption of said bacteria on iron sulfide-containing surfaces but insufficient for significant enzymatic oxidation of said surfaces; (d) separating the hydrophobic non-sulfide particles from the sulfide-containing particles rendered hydrophilic by adsorption of said bacteria; and (e) recovering at least the hydrophobic solids.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim
157 words
A process for reducing the sulfur content of impure iron sulfide-containing minerals which include hydrophobic components comprising: (a) subdividing the impure minerals until iron sulfide-containing surfaces are released from non-sulfide hydrophobic solids; (b) conditioning or maintaining bacteria requiring iron for growth and being selected from the Thiobacillus and Ferrobacillus groups, and from recycled said bacteria, in an aqueous medium deficient in iron nutrient, to deplete bacterial iron reserves, thereby causing the bacteria to be in condition to be rapidly adsorbed on fresh iron sulfide surfaces in order to restore depleted nutrient iron; (c) contacting the subdivided mineral solids from (a) with the bacteria from (b) in an aqueous medium for a short time sufficient for adsorption of said bacteria on iron sulfide-containing surfaces but insufficient for significant enzymatic oxidation of said surfaces; (d) separating the hydrophobic non-sulfide particles from the sulfide-containing particles rendered hydrophilic by adsorption of said bacteria; and (e) recovering at least the hydrophobic solids.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
14 words
The process of claim 1 wherein the mineral comprises a coal or coal-containing ore.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
13 words
The process of claim 1 wherein the mineral comprises a pyritic metal ore.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
22 words
The process of claims 1 or 2 wherein the bacteria is selected from Thiobacillus ferrooxidans, Thiobacillus thiooxidans, Ferrobacillus ferrooxidans, and mixtures thereof.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
23 words
The process of claims 1 or 2 wherein the time of contacting in step (c) is within about 10 minutes to 1 hour.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
25 words
The process of claims 1 or 2 wherein a hydrophilic sulfide+bacteria mixture is recovered in step (e), and at least part of the bacteria recycled.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
31 words
The process of claims 1 or 2 wherein a bacteria-rich material is recovered in step (e), incubated in the absence of added iron nutrient, and bacteria therefrom recycled to step (c).
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
22 words
The process of claims 1 or 2 wherein a bacterial fraction is recovered in step (e) and recycled directly to step (c).
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
47 words
The process of claims 1 or 2 wherein the selected bacteria are utilized in step (c) in the form of a mixture of (i) a major proportion of recycled bacteria from step (d) which has been maintained iron-deficient, and (ii) a minor proportion of fresh iron-deficient bacteria.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
18 words
The process of claims 1 or 2 wherein sulfide solids are recovered in step (e) for further processing.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
19 words
The process of claims 1 or 2 wherein the separation in step (d) is an agglomeration with hydrophobic liquid.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
24 words
The process of claims 1 or 2 wherein the separation in step (d) is an agglomeration with hydrocarbon liquid which is recovered and recycled.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
21 words
The process of claims 1 or 2 wherein the separation in step (d) is a froth flotation of the non-sulfide solids.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim
25 words
The process of claims 1 or 2 wherein the separation in step (d) is a preferential adsorption of hydrophobic solids onto a retentive hydrophobic surface.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim
26 words
The process of claims 1 or 2 wherein aqueous phase or wash water from step (d) or (e) is recycled to step (a) for wet grinding.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim
16 words
The process of claims 1 or 2 wherein any aqueous phase containing bacterial nutrients is recycled.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim
17 words
The process of claims 1 or 2 wherein hydrophilic solids are separated for discard after step (e).
References Cited (Backward Citations)
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1984-05-25 | 1984-11-24 | 1985-05-26 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 1988-05-25 | 1988-11-24 | 1989-05-26 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 1992-05-25 | 1992-11-24 | 1993-05-26 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |