US4268306A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Process for removing mercury from solid waste material
Assignee: Auralight AB
•
Filing: 1980-02-25
•
Granted: 1981-05-19
•
Expires: 2000-02-25
Abstract
Abstract The invention provides apparatus and a process for removing mercury from solid waste material. The solid waste material is placed in a vacuum chamber. The chamber is heated above the vaporization temperature of mercury. A vacuum condition is formed and then, while the temperature is maintained above the vaporization temperature of mercury, an inert gas is placed in the vacuum chamber. During this heating period, the pressure in the vacuum chamber is periodically varied from a maximum to a minimum. The apparatus utilized is a vacuum chamber, a vacuum pump, and a pipe that contains a mercury condenser. The pipe also functions through a side inlet as a means for introducing the inert gas into the vacuum chamber, while the vacuum pump is closed off. A control unit for controlling the alternate periods of mercury vapor withdrawal and inert gas introduction into the vacuum chamber is provided.
Inventors
- 👤 Karl-Ake G. Bjorkman
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-11-01 08:02
CPC Classifications
C; C22; C22B; C22B43/00; Y; Y02; Y02P; Y02P10/00; Y02P10/20
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 8
Claim 1
Independent Claim
139 words
A process for removing mercury from mercury-containing solid waste material comprising in combination heating said mercury-containing solid waste material in a vacuum chamber to a temperature above the vaporization temperature of mercury, lowering the pressure in said vacuum chamber to about 40 kPa, and then introducing an inert gas into said vacuum chamber and raising the pressure therein to a value which is not in excess of about 80 kPa, and withdrawing mercury vapor from said chamber while at the same time decreasing the pressure therein to a value of about 40 kPa, followed by the introduction of said inert gas to raise the pressure up to a maximum of about 80 kPa, and repeating said sequence of mercury vapor withdrawal and addition of inert gas until the desired amount of mercury has been removed from said vacuum chamber.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim
139 words
A process for removing mercury from mercury-containing solid waste material comprising in combination heating said mercury-containing solid waste material in a vacuum chamber to a temperature above the vaporization temperature of mercury, lowering the pressure in said vacuum chamber to about 40 kPa, and then introducing an inert gas into said vacuum chamber and raising the pressure therein to a value which is not in excess of about 80 kPa, and withdrawing mercury vapor from said chamber while at the same time decreasing the pressure therein to a value of about 40 kPa, followed by the introduction of said inert gas to raise the pressure up to a maximum of about 80 kPa, and repeating said sequence of mercury vapor withdrawal and addition of inert gas until the desired amount of mercury has been removed from said vacuum chamber.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
54 words
The process of claim 1, wherein the pressure is lowered to about 40 kPa while mercury is being withdrawn and wherein the pressure is raised to about 53 kPa by the introduction of said inert gas, and said cycles of mercury vapor withdrawal and inert gas introduction are controlled substantially within said pressure range.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
49 words
The process of claim 1 or claim 2, wherein after said desired amount of mercury is withdrawn, the pressure in the vacuum chamber is reduced below the limit of the Pirani effect and maintained at said pressure until the chamber and the solid material contained therein have cooled down.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
39 words
The process of claim 3, wherein said sequence of withdrawal of vaporized mercury followed by introduction of inert gas to raise the pressure is carried out about twice per hour during the mercury vapor withdrawal portion of said process.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
43 words
The process of claim 1 or claim 2, wherein said sequence of withdrawal of vaporized mercury followed by introduction of inert gas to raise the pressure is carried out at least twice per hour during the mercury vapor withdrawal portion of said process.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
17 words
The process of claim 5, wherein said sequence is carried out for about 4 cycles per hour.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
20 words
The process of claim 5, wherein said sequence is carried out for between about 3.5 and 4 cycles per hour.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1984-05-18 | 1984-11-17 | 1985-05-19 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 1988-05-18 | 1988-11-17 | 1989-05-19 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 1992-05-18 | 1992-11-17 | 1993-05-19 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |