US4258322A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Electromagnetic subsoil prospecting process using an asymptotic low frequency range
Assignee: CGG SA
•
Filing: 1978-05-08
•
Granted: 1981-03-24
•
Expires: 1998-05-08
Abstract
Abstract In a sub-soil prospecting process a vertical magnetic field transmitter dipole and a receiver dipole are placed on the ground, away from each other. The receiver dipole is oriented to detect a radial horizontal magnetic field relative to the transmitter dipole. At low frequencies, the magnetic field detected assumes asymptotic values, and by measuring these values an apparent alternating current resistivity of the sub-soil is deduced. By varying the transmitter-receiver distance, and by simultaneously using a direct current electric prospecting process, a sub-soil model is determined which is less ambiguous than those supplied by electric or induction prospecting alone.
Inventors
- 👤 Jean-Pierre Rocroi
- 👤 Andre Cecchini
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-10-27 04:11
CPC Classifications
G; G01; G01V; G01V3/00; G01V3/08; G01V3/10; G01V3/104; G01V3/108
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 34
Claim 1
Independent Claim
116 words
A sub-soil prospecting method, comprising the steps of: (a) placing above ground a magnetic transmitter dipole and a magnetic receiver dipole spaced at a distance from each other in a prospecting area; (b) energizing the transmitter dipole with alternating current of frequency below a predetermined low frequency; (c) sensing at an output of the receiver dipole a signal representing a detected magnetic field, said predetermined low frequency being a maximum frequency of an asymptotic range in which the magnetic field represented by the receiver dipole output signal is linearly related to the energizing frequency; and determining a quantity related to the ratio of the magnitude of said sensed signal to the value of said energizing frequency.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim
116 words
A sub-soil prospecting method, comprising the steps of: (a) placing above ground a magnetic transmitter dipole and a magnetic receiver dipole spaced at a distance from each other in a prospecting area; (b) energizing the transmitter dipole with alternating current of frequency below a predetermined low frequency; (c) sensing at an output of the receiver dipole a signal representing a detected magnetic field, said predetermined low frequency being a maximum frequency of an asymptotic range in which the magnetic field represented by the receiver dipole output signal is linearly related to the energizing frequency; and determining a quantity related to the ratio of the magnitude of said sensed signal to the value of said energizing frequency.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
30 words
A sub-soil prospecting method according to claim 1, further including the steps of varying the distance between the transmitter dipole and the receiver dipole, and repeating steps (b) and (c).
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
23 words
A subsoil prospecting method according to claim 1 or claim 2, wherein said predetermined low frequency is no greater than about 100 Hz.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
53 words
A subsoil prospecting method according to claim 1 or claim 2, wherein said step of energizing the transmitter dipole includes the step of varying the frequency of said alternating current, and wherein the step of sensing a signal at the receiver dipole output includes sensing a signal for each transmitter dipole energizing frequency.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
23 words
A subsoil prospecting method according to claim 4, wherein the frequency of the alternating current is varied by stepwise reduction of the frequency.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
31 words
A subsoil prospecting method according to claim 5, wherein the frequency reduction is conducted in successive frequency steps related by a geometrical progression to give equal steps on a logarithmic scale.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
54 words
A subsoil prospecting method according to claim 1 or claim 2, wherein step (a) includes the steps of orientating the transmitter dipole as a vertical magnetic dipole, and orientating the receiving dipole with its axis directed towards the transmitter dipole to detect a substantially radial horizontal magnetic field with respect to the transmitter dipole.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
77 words
A sub-soil prospecting method according to claim 7, further comprising the steps of placing a second receiver dipole at substantially the same location as said first-mentioned receiver dipole, and orientating the second receiver dipole to detect a substantially vertical magnetic field, whereby the asymptotic values of the relation between the detected vertical magnetic field and the detected horizontal magnetic field may be determined as a function of the distance between the transmitter dipole and the receiver dipoles.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
24 words
A sub-soil prospecting method according to claim 1 or claim 2, wherein the magnetic transmitter and receiver dipoles are placed substantially at ground level.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
20 words
A subsoil prospecting method according to claim 2, wherein the distance between the transmitter and receiver dipoles is progressively increased.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
38 words
A sub-soil prospecting method according to claim 2, wherein the distance between the transmitter and receiver dipoles is varied in geometrical progression for each repetition of steps (b) and (c) to give equal steps on a logarithmic scale.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
38 words
A sub-soil prospecting method according to claim 2, further comprising the steps of constructing from the signals representing detected magnetic fields an alternating-current apparent resistivity curve as a function of the distance between the transmitter and receiver dipoles.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
100 words
A sub-soil prospecting method according to claim 12, further comprising the step of carrying out at the same prospecting area a direct-current electric prospecting method comprising the steps of: placing in the ground two exciter electrodes at a distance from each other; placing two closely spaced detector electrodes in the ground between the exciter electrodes; applying a direct-current potential across the exciter electrodes; measuring the resultant potential between the detector electrodes; repeating said potential measurement for different distances between the exciter electrodes; and constructing a direct-current apparent sub-soil resistivity curve as a function of the distance between the exciter electrodes.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim
43 words
A sub-soil prospecting method according to claim 13, further comprising the step of combining the measurements taken using said direct-current prospecting method with the receiver dipole output signals of the alternating-current prospecting method to construct a relatively less ambiquous model of the sub-soil.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim
64 words
A sub-soil prospecting method according to claim 14, wherein said step of combining includes the steps of: determining an initial model of the subsoil; determining theoretical direct-current and alternating-current apparent resistivity curves corresponding to the initial model; adjusting the theoretical curves to the constructed curves using the least squares successive approximations techniques; and adjusting the initial model to agree with the adjusted theoretical curves.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim
138 words
A sub-soil prospecting method, comprising the steps of: (a) placing a magnetic transmitter dipole and a magnetic receiver dipole at respective locations above ground spaced at a distance from each other in a prospecting area; (b) energizing the magnetic transmitter dipole with a low frequency alternating current; (c) sensing at an output of the magnetic receiver dipole a signal representing a detected magnetic field; and (d) repeating steps (b) and (c) while varying the frequency of said alternating current until reaching a low-frequency asymptotic range in which the detected magnetic field represented by the receiver dipole output signal is substantially linearly related to the alternating current energizing frequency; and for each repetition of steps (b) and (c), determining a quantity related to the ratio of the magnitude of said sensed signal to the value of said energizing frequency.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim
138 words
A sub-soil prospecting method, comprising the steps of: (a) placing a magnetic transmitter dipole and a magnetic receiver dipole at respective locations above ground spaced at a distance from each other in a prospecting area; (b) energizing the magnetic transmitter dipole with a low frequency alternating current; (c) sensing at an output of the magnetic receiver dipole a signal representing a detected magnetic field; and (d) repeating steps (b) and (c) while varying the frequency of said alternating current until reaching a low-frequency asymptotic range in which the detected magnetic field represented by the receiver dipole output signal is substantially linearly related to the alternating current energizing frequency; and for each repetition of steps (b) and (c), determining a quantity related to the ratio of the magnitude of said sensed signal to the value of said energizing frequency.
Claim 19
Dependent Claim
35 words
A sub-soil prospecting method according to claim 16, wherein step (d) comprises repeating steps (b) and (c) for successively decreasing low frequencies until the output signal of the receiver dipole lies within said asymptotic range.
Claim 20
Dependent Claim
20 words
A sub-soil prospecting method according to claim 17, wherein the frequency of said alternating current is successively reduced in steps.
Claim 21
Dependent Claim
28 words
A sub-soil prospecting method according to claim 18, wherein the successive steps of frequency reduction are related by geometrical progression to give equal steps on a logarithmic scale.
Claim 22
Dependent Claim
52 words
A sub-soil prospecting method according to claim 16, wherein step (a) includes the steps of orientating the transmitter dipole as a vertical magnetic dipole and orientating the receiver dipole with its axis directed substantially toward the transmitter dipole to detect a substantially radial horizontal magnetic field with respect to the transmitter dipole.
Claim 23
Dependent Claim
21 words
A sub-soil prospecting method according to claim 20, wherein both said transmitter and receiver dipoles are placed substantially at ground level.
Claim 24
Dependent Claim
58 words
A sub-soil prospecting method according to claim 21, further comprising the step of determining the ratio of the value of the detected radial horizontal magnetic field represented by the receiver dipole output signal to the value of the energizing alternating current frequency, said radio being substantially constant when the energizing alternating frequency is within said low-frequency asymptotic range.
Claim 25
Dependent Claim
82 words
A sub-soil prospecting method according to claim 20, further comprising placing a second receiver dipole at substantially the same location as said first-mentioned receiver dipole, orientating the second receiver dipole to detect a substantially vertical magnetic field, sensing at an output of the second magnetic receiver dipole a signal representing the detected vertical magnetic field, and determining a quantity related to the ratio of the value of the detected horizontal radial magnetic field to the value of the detected vertical magnetic field.
Claim 26
Dependent Claim
58 words
A sub-soil prospecting method according to claim 16, wherein step (d) further comprises repeating steps (b) and (c) while varying the distance between the transmitter and receiver dipoles whereby at least one receiver dipole output signal representing a detected magnetic field value lying within the low-frequency asymptotic range is obtained for each transmitter dipole to receiver dipole distance.
Claim 27
Dependent Claim
60 words
A sub-soil prospecting method according to claim 24, wherein the distance between the transmitter and receiver dipoles is successively increased, step (d) comprises repeating steps (b) and (c) once for each transmitter dipole to receiver dipole distance, and the frequency of the energizing alternating current is within the low-frequency asymptotic range for the initial transmitter dipole to receiver dipole distance.
Claim 28
Dependent Claim
39 words
A sub-soil prospecting method according to claim 25, wherein the distance between the transmitter dipole and the receiver dipole is successively increased in steps, the increasing distances forming a geometrical progression to give equal steps on a logarithmic scale.
Claim 29
Dependent Claim
41 words
A sub-soil prospecting method according to claim 24, further comprising the step of recording a receiver dipole output signal value representing a detected magnetic field lying within the asymptotic range as a function of the transmitter dipole to receiver dipole distance.
Claim 30
Dependent Claim
56 words
A sub-soil prospecting method according to claim 27, further comprising the step of determining an alternating current apparent resistivity value from each said at least one magnetic receiver dipole output signal, the alternating current apparent resistivity being a function of transmitter dipole to receiver dipole distance and being substantially independent of the alternating current energizing frequency.
Claim 31
Dependent Claim
154 words
A sub-soil prospecting method according to claim 28, wherein the magnetic transmitter dipole is placed having a dipole axis thereof arranged vertically, the magnetic receiver dipole is placed having a dipole axis thereof arranged horizontally and directed substantially radially towards the transmitter dipole, and the alternating current apparent resistivity values are determined in accordance with the relationship: ##EQU6## wherein ρ a is the alternating current apparent resistivity in ohms-meter; e is the efficiency coefficient of the transmitter dipole (dimensionless); I is the maximum amplitude of the current fed to the transmitter dipole in amperes; T is the period of the alternating current fed to the transmitter dipole in seconds; r is the distance between the transmitter dipole and the receiver dipole in meters; α is the angle between the field detection axis through the receiver dipole and the direction of the transmitter dipole; and H.sub.α is the magnetic field detected by the receiver dipole.
Claim 32
Dependent Claim
100 words
A sub-soil prospecting method according to claim 28, further comprising the step of carrying out at the same prospecting area a direct-current electric prospecting method comprising the steps of: placing in the ground two exciter electrodes at a distance from each other; placing two closely spaced detector electrodes in the ground between the exciter electrodes; applying a direct-current potential across the exciter electrodes; measuring the resultant potential between the detector electrodes; repeating said potential measurement for different distances between the exciter electrodes; and constructing a direct-current apparent sub-soil resistivity curve as a function of the distance between the exciter electrodes.
Claim 33
Dependent Claim
44 words
A sub-soil prospecting method according to claim 30, further comprising the step of combining the measurements taken using said direct-current prospecting method with the receiver dipole output signals of the alternating current prospecting method to construct a relatively less ambiguous model of the sub-soil.
Claim 34
Dependent Claim
64 words
A sub-soil prospecting method according to claim 31, wherein said step of combining includes the steps of: determining an initial model of the subsoil; determining theoretical direct-current and alternating-current apparent resistivity curves corresponding to the initial model; adjusting the theoretical curves to the constructed curves using the least squares successive approximations technique; and adjusting the initial model to agree with the adjusted theoretical curves.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US1718352A
Cited
US1843407A
Cited
US2731596A
Cited
US3548299A
Cited
US3551798A
Cited
US3936728A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1984-03-23 | 1984-09-22 | 1985-03-24 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 1988-03-23 | 1988-09-22 | 1989-03-24 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 1992-03-23 | 1992-09-22 | 1993-03-24 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |