← Back to Patent Explorer
US4243550A Expired / Lapsed US ⏱️ 0.0 years remaining

Catalyst demetallization with a reductive SO2 wash

Assignee: Coastal Catalyst Technology Inc
•
Filing: 1976-06-14
•
Granted: 1981-01-06
•
Expires: 1996-06-14
📄 Original PDF 🌐 Google Patents 🔄 Sync Now

Abstract

Abstract A process for the removal of metal poisons such as nickel, iron and/or vanadium from a hydrocarbon conversion catalyst which includes the step of contacting the catalyst with a reductive wash medium comprising an aqueous, preferably saturated, solution of SO 2 to remove at least a portion of the metal poisons. The vanadium and nickel metals may be recovered from the resultant used wash solution for possible metallurgical use. The SO 2 reductively washed catalyst may also be subjected to a subsequent oxidative wash such as hydrogen peroxide wash prior to its return to the hydrocarbon conversion process.

Inventors

  • 👤 Emmett H. Burk
  • 👤 Jin S. Yoo
  • 👤 John A. Karch
  • 👤 Jui-Yuan Sun

Bibliographic Details

Application Number —
Jurisdiction US
Data Source google_patents
Last Synchronized 2026-11-08 16:03
CPC Classifications
B; B01; B01J; B01J29/00; B01J29/90; B01J21/00; B01J21/20; Y; Y10; Y10S; Y10S502/00; Y10S502/515; Y10S502/516

Claims Analysis

Total Claims: 26
Claim 1
Independent Claim 163 words
In a process for treating a metal poisoned-containing catalyst which has been poisoned in a hydrocarbon conversion process, wherein a feedstock containing at least one of said metals is contacted with catalyst to convert hydrocarbon and deposit carbonaceous material is removed from said catalyst, the improvement which comprises: (i) contacting said metal poison-containing catalyst with at least one sulfiding agent to convert at least a portion of said poison metal to metal-sulfur-containing compound and form a sulfided catalyst; (ii) contacting said sulfided catalyst with an oxygen-containing medium at conditions to promote subsequent metals removal and form a promoted catalyst; (iii) contacting said promoted catalyst with an aqueous, SO 2 reductive wash medium to remove at least a portion of the metal poison from said promoted catalyst, said contacting being effected in a contact time of about 0.5-15 minutes; (iv) subjecting said reductively washed catalyst to an aqueous oxidative wash; and (v) recovering a catalyst of reduced metal poison content and improved catalytic activity.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim 163 words
In a process for treating a metal poisoned-containing catalyst which has been poisoned in a hydrocarbon conversion process, wherein a feedstock containing at least one of said metals is contacted with catalyst to convert hydrocarbon and deposit carbonaceous material is removed from said catalyst, the improvement which comprises: (i) contacting said metal poison-containing catalyst with at least one sulfiding agent to convert at least a portion of said poison metal to metal-sulfur-containing compound and form a sulfided catalyst; (ii) contacting said sulfided catalyst with an oxygen-containing medium at conditions to promote subsequent metals removal and form a promoted catalyst; (iii) contacting said promoted catalyst with an aqueous, SO 2 reductive wash medium to remove at least a portion of the metal poison from said promoted catalyst, said contacting being effected in a contact time of about 0.5-15 minutes; (iv) subjecting said reductively washed catalyst to an aqueous oxidative wash; and (v) recovering a catalyst of reduced metal poison content and improved catalytic activity.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim 17 words
A process as in claim 1 wherein the reductive wash medium is a saturated SO 2 solution.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim 19 words
The process as in claim 1 wherein said reductive wash is effect at a temperature of about 65°-80° C.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim 14 words
A process as in claim 3 where said contact time is about 1-5 minutes.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim 18 words
A process as in claim 1 wherein the oxidative wash medium is an aqueous solution of hydrogen peroxide.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim 27 words
A process as in claim 5 wherein said oxidative wash is effected at a temperature of about 60°-85° C. with a contact time of about 1-5 minutes.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim 20 words
A process as in claim 6 wherein said aqueous hydrogen peroxide comprises about 2 to 30 weight % hydrogen peroxide.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim 20 words
A process as in claim 1 which comprises alternating reductive and oxidative washes, the last wash comprising an oxidative wash.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim 15 words
A process as in claim 1 wherein the contaminated catalyst comprises a zeolitic molecular sieve.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim 50 words
A process as in claim 9 wherein said zeolitic molecular sieve comprises a decationized zeolitic molecular sieve having less than 90% of the aluminum atoms associated with cations, a crystalline structure capable of internally absorbing benzene and a SiO 2 to Al 2 O 3 molar ratio greater than 3.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim 28 words
A process as in claim 1 wherein said reductively washed catalyst is washed to remove at least a portion of the SO 2 prior to the oxidative wash.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim 218 words
In a catalytic cracking process wherein a hydrocarbon feedstock contaminated with at least one metal is contacted with catalyst in a cracking reaction zone to convert at least a portion of said feedstock to mroe valuable, lower boiling hydrocarbon products and to deposit carbonaceous material on said catalyst and form a metal poisoned-containing catalyst and at least a portion of said carbonaceous material is removed from said catalyst, the improvement which comprises: (i) withdrawing at least a portion of said metal poisoned-containing catalyst from said cracking reaction zone; (ii) contacting said metal poisoned-containing catalyst with at least one sulfiding agent to convert at least a portion of said poison metal to metal-sulfur-containing compound and form a sulfided catalyst; (iii) contacting said sulfided catalyst with an oxygen-containing medium at conditions to promote subsequent metals removal and form a promoted catalyst; (iv) contacting said promoted catalyst with an aqueous, SO 2 reductive wash medium to remove at least a portion of the metal poison from said promoted catalyst, said contacting being effected in a contact time of about 0.5-15 minutes; (v) subjecting said redutively washed catalyst to an aqueous oxidative wash; (vi) recovering a catalyst of reduced metal poison content and improved catalytic activity; and (vii) returning at least a portion of said recovered catalyst to said cracking reaction zone.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim 218 words
In a catalytic cracking process wherein a hydrocarbon feedstock contaminated with at least one metal is contacted with catalyst in a cracking reaction zone to convert at least a portion of said feedstock to mroe valuable, lower boiling hydrocarbon products and to deposit carbonaceous material on said catalyst and form a metal poisoned-containing catalyst and at least a portion of said carbonaceous material is removed from said catalyst, the improvement which comprises: (i) withdrawing at least a portion of said metal poisoned-containing catalyst from said cracking reaction zone; (ii) contacting said metal poisoned-containing catalyst with at least one sulfiding agent to convert at least a portion of said poison metal to metal-sulfur-containing compound and form a sulfided catalyst; (iii) contacting said sulfided catalyst with an oxygen-containing medium at conditions to promote subsequent metals removal and form a promoted catalyst; (iv) contacting said promoted catalyst with an aqueous, SO 2 reductive wash medium to remove at least a portion of the metal poison from said promoted catalyst, said contacting being effected in a contact time of about 0.5-15 minutes; (v) subjecting said redutively washed catalyst to an aqueous oxidative wash; (vi) recovering a catalyst of reduced metal poison content and improved catalytic activity; and (vii) returning at least a portion of said recovered catalyst to said cracking reaction zone.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim 20 words
A process as in claim 12 wherein the reductive aqueous wash medium is a solution of SO 2 in water.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim 16 words
A process as in claim 12 wherein reductive wash medium is a saturated SO 2 solution.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim 27 words
A process as in claim 14 wherein said reductive wash is effected at a temperature of about 65°-80° C. with a contact time of about 0.5-10 minutes.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim 14 words
A process as in claim 15 where said contact time is about 1-5 minutes.
Claim 19
Dependent Claim 18 words
A process as in claim 12 wherein the oxidative wash medium is an aqueous solution of hydrogen peroxide.
Claim 20
Dependent Claim 27 words
A process as in claim 17 wherein said oxidative wash is effected at a temperature of about 60°-85° C. with a contact time of about 1-5 minutes.
Claim 21
Dependent Claim 20 words
A process as in claim 18 wherein said aqueous hydrogen peroxide comprises about 2 to 30 weight % hydrogen peroxide.
Claim 22
Dependent Claim 20 words
A process as in claim 12 which comprises alternate reductive and oxidative wahses, the last wash comprising an oxidative wash.
Claim 23
Dependent Claim 15 words
A process as in claim 12 wherein the contaminated catalyst comprises a zeolitic molecular sieve.
Claim 24
Dependent Claim 50 words
A process as in claim 12 wherein said zeolite molecular sieve comprises a decationized zeolitic molecular sieve having less than 90% of the aluminum atoms associated with cations, a crystalline structure capable of internally absorbing benzene and a SiO 2 to Al 2 O 3 molar ratio greater than 3.
Claim 25
Dependent Claim 28 words
A process as in claim 12 wherein said reductively washed catalyst is washed to remove at least a portion of the SO 2 prior to the oxidative wash.
Claim 26
Dependent Claim 15 words
A process as in claim 12 where said feedstock is a reduced or topped crude.

References Cited (Backward Citations)

US3236761A Cited
US3148155A Cited
US3168481A Cited
US3150103A Cited
US3234145A Cited
US3255102A Cited
US3147228A Cited
US3562150A Cited

USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows

Annuity Stage Window Opens Payment Deadline Surcharge Period Until Estimated Fee Status
3.5 Years (Year 4) 1984-01-06 1984-07-07 1985-01-06 $2000.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
7.5 Years (Year 8) 1988-01-06 1988-07-07 1989-01-06 $3760.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
11.5 Years (Year 12) 1992-01-06 1992-07-07 1993-01-06 $7700.00 Window Closed / Lapsed

Assigned Categories & Tags

No categories assigned to this patent yet.

Assign Category Tag