← Back to Patent Explorer
US4233677A Expired / Lapsed US ⏱️ 0.0 years remaining

Automatic system and method for testing marine streamers of seismic exploration systems

Assignee: Chevron USA Inc
•
Filing: 1978-02-21
•
Granted: 1980-11-11
•
Expires: 1998-02-21
📄 Original PDF 🌐 Google Patents 🔄 Sync Now

Abstract

Abstract In accordance with the present invention, a marine streamer test system and method (MARSTEST) is disclosed for testing field-worthiness of hydrophone sections within the streamer under both passive and dynamic operating conditions. With regard to a passive operating state, five (5) test parameters are automatically generated and compared with upper and lower limits stored within a mini-computer housed aboard the marine exploration boat. Any out-of-specification values trip an alarm network and a printer to warn of the malfunctioning streamer section. Result: replacement or other repair can be effected. With regard to dynamic operating conditions, acceptable "signature" characteristics of the streamer (such characteristics can be 2 or more of the above 5 parameters) are stored within the computer aboard the exploration boat and are compared with actually generated field parameter values acquired during operations, say between "shots", i.e., between the sequential activation of the seismic source used in the generation of the seismic data. Result: any seismic data acquired by the suspect hydrophone section can be properly interpreted in view of the malfunctioning state of that section.

Inventors

  • 👤 Earl J. Brown
  • 👤 Swan A. Sie

Bibliographic Details

Application Number —
Jurisdiction US
Data Source google_patents
Last Synchronized 2026-11-05 07:38
CPC Classifications
G; G01; G01V; G01V1/00; G01V1/16; G01V1/20; G01V13/00

Claims Analysis

Total Claims: 24
Claim 1
Independent Claim 270 words
A method of testing a marine streamer of a seismic marine exploration system in a passive or a dynamic state, said streamer including a series of hydrophone sections X 1 , X 2 , . . . X n , each containing a plurality of hydrophones and being transformer-coupled via a set of marine conductors N 1 , N 2 , . . . N n to a marine streamer test system aboard an exploration boat, comprising the steps of: (a) driving one of said sections X 1 , X 2 , . . . X n with an analog signal A of known characteristics applied directly to terminals of said one section; (b) detecting an analog signal B across one of said set of conductors N 1 , N 2 , . . . N n in response to said drive signal A; (c) converting said signal B to digital values; (d) automatically performing at least one of a series of test measurements Z 1 , Z 2 , . . . Z m using a programmed digital computer of said marine system aboard said boat to determine field-worthiness of said one section X 1 , X 2 , . . . X n ; (e) by means of said digital computer automatically comparing one or more of test measurements Z 1 , Z 2 , . . . Z m with previously stored values Z' 1 , Z' 2 , . . . Z' m so as to determine change in operating characteristics of said sections X 1 , X 2 , . . . X n .
Claim 2
Independent Claim 270 words
A method of testing a marine streamer of a seismic marine exploration system in a passive or a dynamic state, said streamer including a series of hydrophone sections X 1 , X 2 , . . . X n , each containing a plurality of hydrophones and being transformer-coupled via a set of marine conductors N 1 , N 2 , . . . N n to a marine streamer test system aboard an exploration boat, comprising the steps of: (a) driving one of said sections X 1 , X 2 , . . . X n with an analog signal A of known characteristics applied directly to terminals of said one section; (b) detecting an analog signal B across one of said set of conductors N 1 , N 2 , . . . N n in response to said drive signal A; (c) converting said signal B to digital values; (d) automatically performing at least one of a series of test measurements Z 1 , Z 2 , . . . Z m using a programmed digital computer of said marine system aboard said boat to determine field-worthiness of said one section X 1 , X 2 , . . . X n ; (e) by means of said digital computer automatically comparing one or more of test measurements Z 1 , Z 2 , . . . Z m with previously stored values Z' 1 , Z' 2 , . . . Z' m so as to determine change in operating characteristics of said sections X 1 , X 2 , . . . X n .
Claim 3
Dependent Claim 43 words
The method of claim 1 in which said one of test measurements Z 1 , Z 2 , . . . Z m is the natural frequency of said one section X 1 , X 2 , . . . X n .
Claim 4
Dependent Claim 75 words
The method of claim 2 in which steps (a) and (b) are further characterized by signal A being a sinusoidal drive current of known frequency and by signal B being a sinusoidal voltage signal responsive to said signal A, and step (d) is further characterized by automatically incrementing changes in frequency of signal A using said computer until zero phase shift occurs between signals A and B, as indicated in digitized form within said computer.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim 42 words
The method of claim 1 in which said one of test measurements Z 1 , Z 2 , . . . Z m is the impedance of said one section X 1 , X 2 , . . . X n .
Claim 6
Dependent Claim 77 words
The method of claim 4 in which steps (a) and (b) are further characterized by signal A being a sinusoidal drive current of known frequency and by signal B being a sinusoidal voltage response signal thereto, and step (d) is further characterized by changing signal A so that signal A will not saturate a transformer of said one section and response signal B is less than full scale, and calculating maximum voltage, maximum current and impedance therefrom.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim 44 words
The method of claim 1 in which said one of test measurements Z 1 , Z 2 , . . . Z m is the DC line resistance of said one section X 1 , X 2 , . . . X n .
Claim 8
Dependent Claim 69 words
The method of claim 6 in which steps (a) and (b) are further characterized by signals A and B being DC current and voltage signals, respectively, and step (d) is further characterized by incrementing signals A and B so as to determine DC line resistance after DC resistance of a transformer secondary of said one section X 1 , X 2 , . . . X n is subtracted.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim 42 words
The method of claim 1 in which said one of test measurements Z 1 , Z 2 , . . . Z m is damping ratio of said one section X 1 , X 2 , . . . X n .
Claim 10
Dependent Claim 86 words
The method of claim 8 in which steps (a) and (b) are further characterized by signal A being a step change in drive current and by signal B being a transient signal in response thereof, and step (d) is further characterized by determining (i) a first damping ratio b 1 based on first response peak overshoot; (ii) a second damping ratio b 2 based on period between peaks and on natural frequency; and (iii) an average damping ratio b equal to [b 1 +b 2 ]/2.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim 42 words
The method of claim 1 in which said one of test measurements Z 1 , Z 2 , . . . Z m is phase angle of said one section X 1 , X 2 , . . . X n .
Claim 12
Dependent Claim 99 words
The method of claim 10 in which steps (a) and (b) are further characterized by signal A being a sinusoidal drive current of known frequency and by signal B being a sinusoidal voltage signal responsive to said signal A, and step (d) is further characterized by automatically synchronizing digitization of signals A and B such that a known zero crossing address point of signal A can be related to closely adjacent address points of said signal B to determine phase angle of response of said one section X 1 , X 2 , . . . X n .
Claim 13
Dependent Claim 336 words
In testing a marine streamer of a seismic marine exploration system in a passive or dynamic state, said streamer including a series of hydrophone sections X 1 , X 2 , . . . X n each containing a plurality of hydrophones and being transformer-coupled via a set of marine conductors N 1 , N 2 , . . . N n , to provide seismic data to seismic processing and recording circuitry aboard an exploration boat, a marine streamer test system also aboard said exploration boat connected to said sets of marine conductors, comprising: (i) a relay array means comprising input contacts connected to said sets of marine conductors, first and second sets of output contacts adjacent to said input contacts, and bridging electrical means for controllably connecting said input contacts and either said first or said second sets of contacts in bridging electrical contact, said first set of output contacts being connected to said seismic processing and recording circuitry aboard said boat; (ii) a signal conditioning means including terminal means controllably connectable to said second set of output contacts so as to test said streamer for field-worthiness, said conditioning means including (a) means for directly driving one of said sections X 1 , X 2 , . . . X n with an analog signal A of known characteristics via said terminal means; (b) means for detecting an analog signal B across one of said set of conductors N 1 , N 2 , . . . N n in response to said drive signal A; (c) means for converting said signal B to digital values; and (iii) programmed digital computer means connected to said signal conditioning means for controlling said drive means, said detecting means and said digitizing means, as well as automatically performing at least one of a series of test measurements Z 1 , Z 2 , . . . Z m to determine field-worthiness of said one section X 1 , X 2 , . . . X n .
Claim 14
Dependent Claim 336 words
In testing a marine streamer of a seismic marine exploration system in a passive or dynamic state, said streamer including a series of hydrophone sections X 1 , X 2 , . . . X n each containing a plurality of hydrophones and being transformer-coupled via a set of marine conductors N 1 , N 2 , . . . N n , to provide seismic data to seismic processing and recording circuitry aboard an exploration boat, a marine streamer test system also aboard said exploration boat connected to said sets of marine conductors, comprising: (i) a relay array means comprising input contacts connected to said sets of marine conductors, first and second sets of output contacts adjacent to said input contacts, and bridging electrical means for controllably connecting said input contacts and either said first or said second sets of contacts in bridging electrical contact, said first set of output contacts being connected to said seismic processing and recording circuitry aboard said boat; (ii) a signal conditioning means including terminal means controllably connectable to said second set of output contacts so as to test said streamer for field-worthiness, said conditioning means including (a) means for directly driving one of said sections X 1 , X 2 , . . . X n with an analog signal A of known characteristics via said terminal means; (b) means for detecting an analog signal B across one of said set of conductors N 1 , N 2 , . . . N n in response to said drive signal A; (c) means for converting said signal B to digital values; and (iii) programmed digital computer means connected to said signal conditioning means for controlling said drive means, said detecting means and said digitizing means, as well as automatically performing at least one of a series of test measurements Z 1 , Z 2 , . . . Z m to determine field-worthiness of said one section X 1 , X 2 , . . . X n .
Claim 15
Dependent Claim 33 words
Said marine test system of claim 12 in which said means for driving said one section with an analog signal A under control of said digital computer means is a constant current generator.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim 43 words
Said marine test system of claim 12 in which said means for driving said one section with an analog signal A under control of said digital computer means is a sine wave function generator connected through digital-to-analog converter (DAC) to said one section.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim 42 words
Said marine test system of claim 12 in which said means for detecting said analog signal B and means for digitizing said signal B under control of said digital computer means is a variable amplifier in circuit with an analog-to-digital converter (ADC).
Claim 18
Dependent Claim 46 words
Said marine test system of claim 12 in which said computer means additionally automatically compares one or more of said test measurements Z 1 , Z 2 , . . . Z m with stored like values to indicate authenticity and stability of said testing method.
Claim 19
Dependent Claim 49 words
Said marine test system of claim 16 in which said computer means includes alarm and printer means to be automatically activated to visually and audibly warn that said one or more test measurements Z 1 , Z 2 , . . . Z m are not within specification limits.
Claim 20
Dependent Claim 64 words
Said marine test system of claim 12 in which said computer means additionally automatically compares one or more of test measurements Z 1 . . . Z m with stored prior-obtained like signature values Z' 1 . . . Z' m so as to determine change in operating characteristics of said sections X 1 , X 2 , . . . X n .
Claim 21
Dependent Claim 44 words
Said marine test system of claim 18 in which said computer means includes alarm and printer means to be automatically activated to visually and audibly warn that one or more test measurements Z 1 . . . Z m has changed under operating conditions.
Claim 22
Dependent Claim 29 words
Said marine test system of claim 19 in which said one or more test measurements Z 1 . . . Z m are impedance and phase angle values only.
Claim 23
Dependent Claim 19 words
Said marine test system of claim 12 in which X n =48, N n =48, and Z m =5.
Claim 24
Dependent Claim 19 words
Said marine test system of claim 12 in which X n =48, N n =48 and Z m =2.

References Cited (Backward Citations)

US2748348A Cited
US3858169A Cited
US3930216A Cited
US4052694A Cited
US4015202A Cited
US4043175A Cited
US4160228A Cited
US4003018A Cited
US4166270A Cited

USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows

Annuity Stage Window Opens Payment Deadline Surcharge Period Until Estimated Fee Status
3.5 Years (Year 4) 1983-11-11 1984-05-12 1984-11-11 $2000.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
7.5 Years (Year 8) 1987-11-11 1988-05-12 1988-11-11 $3760.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
11.5 Years (Year 12) 1991-11-11 1992-05-12 1992-11-11 $7700.00 Window Closed / Lapsed

Assigned Categories & Tags

No categories assigned to this patent yet.

Assign Category Tag