US4208718A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Method of optimizing the operation of a computer controlled machine tool
Assignee: Kearney and Trecker Corp
•
Filing: 1978-06-05
•
Granted: 1980-06-17
•
Expires: 1998-06-05
Abstract
Abstract The feed rate of a computer controlled machine tool is periodically calculated every 9.6 milliseconds to produce a horsepower equal to a target horsepower at the cutting tool during a milling operation. When the feed rate rises above a predetermined level, the target horsepower is progressively lowered, and when the feed rate drops below a predetermined level, the target horsepower is progressively raised. The total amount of cutting time for each tool is measured and the amount of cutting time under increased target horsepower is also measured. When the amount of cutting time under increased target horsepower exceeds a predetermined percentage of the total cutting time for any given tool, a DULL TOOl signal is generated and the designated tool is subsequently replaced. If no cutting time is recorded, a BROKEN TOOL signal is generated and the broken tool is replaced. When the cutting tool encounters an air gap in the workpiece, the spindle speed is increased and the feed rate is increased to provide a fast feed rate through the air gap. The feed rate and spindle speed are both reduced when the cutting tool re-engages the workpiece after passing through the air gap.
Inventors
- 👤 Han-Chang Chung
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-10-24 01:29
CPC Classifications
G; G05; G05B; G05B19/00; G05B19/02; G05B19/18; G05B19/416; G05B19/4163; Y; Y02; Y02P; Y02P90/00; Y02P90/02; Y10; Y10T; Y10T408/00; Y10T408/16; Y10T408/17; Y10T409/00; Y10T409/30; Y10T409/30084; Y10T409/300896
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 12
Claim 1
Independent Claim
161 words
A method of optimizing the cutting operation of a machine tool, which includes a motor driven rotary cutter carrying spindle that is adapted to be fed relative to a workpiece at varying rates for performing a cutting operation on the workpiece, said method comprising the steps of: (a) Selecting a programmed spindle speed for said spindle; (b) Selecting a target horsepower for said cutting tool: (c) Calculating a target excitation current for said spindle motor which will produce the selected horsepower at said cutting tool at the selected spindle speed; (d) Measuring the actual excitation current of the spindle motor while said cutting tool is cutting said workpiece at a programmed feed rate; (e) Calculating the feed rate change which is required to produce the target excitation current in the spindle motor; (f) Changing said first feed rate by the amount calculated in step (e); and (g) Periodically repeating steps (d) through (f) while said cutting tool is cutting said workpiece.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
161 words
A method of optimizing the cutting operation of a machine tool, which includes a motor driven rotary cutter carrying spindle that is adapted to be fed relative to a workpiece at varying rates for performing a cutting operation on the workpiece, said method comprising the steps of: (a) Selecting a programmed spindle speed for said spindle; (b) Selecting a target horsepower for said cutting tool: (c) Calculating a target excitation current for said spindle motor which will produce the selected horsepower at said cutting tool at the selected spindle speed; (d) Measuring the actual excitation current of the spindle motor while said cutting tool is cutting said workpiece at a programmed feed rate; (e) Calculating the feed rate change which is required to produce the target excitation current in the spindle motor; (f) Changing said first feed rate by the amount calculated in step (e); and (g) Periodically repeating steps (d) through (f) while said cutting tool is cutting said workpiece.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
41 words
The method according to claim 1 wherein said target horsepower is progressively raised up to an upper limit as the feed rate established in step (f) varies from a predetermined low feed rate value to a predetermined minimum feed rate value.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
41 words
The method according to claim 1 wherein said target horsepower is progressively lowered down to a lower limit as the feed rate established in step (f) varies from a predetermined high feed rate value to a predetermined maximum feed rate value.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
36 words
The method according to claim 1 wherein the calculation in step (c) is made in accordance with the formula: ##EQU4## where IT=target armature current, THP=target cutter horsepower, S=spindle speed, and A, B and C are constants.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
42 words
The method according to claim 1 wherein the calculation in step (e) is made in accordance with the formula: ##EQU5## where F=change in feed rate, IT=target armature current, IA=measured armature current, REM=the remainder from the previous calculation of ΔF, and G=a constant.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
51 words
The method according to claim 1 and also including the steps of either increasing the spindle speed if the new feed rate established in step (f) is higher than a predetermined level or decreasing the spindle speed if the new feed rate established in step (f) is below a predetermined level.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
97 words
The method according to claim 2 and further comprising the steps of: (F 1 ) Measuring the total time that said cutting tool is cutting said workpiece; (F 2 ) Measuring the total time that said cutting tool is cutting said workpiece while the feed rate established in step (F) is below said low feed rate level; and (F 3 ) Generating a signal which signifies that said cutting tool is too dull for further use when the time measured in step (F 2 ) exceeds a predetermined percentage of the time measured in (F 1 ).
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
44 words
The method according to claim 1 wherein the calculation in step (c) is made in accordance with the formula: IT=(AS.sup.2 +BS+C)(63,025 THP/S)+DS.sup.2 +ES+F where IT=target armature current, S=spindle speed in RPM, THP=target cutter horsepower and A, B, C, D, E and F are constants.
Claim 10
Independent Claim
212 words
A method of optimizing the performance of a machine tool having a rotary spindle which is rotated by an electric spindle motor and having a cutting tool in said spindle for machining of a workpiece therewith, said method comprising the steps of: (a) Monitoring the armature current IA of said spindle motor; (b) Selecting a reference current level AIR GAP TOL (air gap tolerance) for said armature current IA below which said cutting tool is in an air gap in said workpiece; (c) Comparing the magnitude of IA+AGHYST to AGTOL, where AGHYST (air gap hysteresis) is a constant; (d) Setting the magnitude of AGHYST to a relatively low value when IA+AGHYST<AGTOL to prevent false triggering back to the condition IA+AGHYST>AGTOL due to variation in IA; (e) Increasing the feed rate of said machining operation from its programmed machining feed rate when IA+AGHYST<AGTOL to reduce the amount of time spent in traversing said air gap; (f) Setting the magnitude of AGHYST to a relatively high value when IA+AGHYST>AGTOL to prevent false triggering back to the condition IA+AGHYST<AGTOL due to variation in IA; and (g) Decreasing said feed rate back to its programmed machining feed rate when IA+AGHYST>AGTOL, which indicates that said cutting tool has re-engaged said workpiece after passing through said air gap.
Claim 11
Independent Claim
212 words
A method of optimizing the performance of a machine tool having a rotary spindle which is rotated by an electric spindle motor and having a cutting tool in said spindle for machining of a workpiece therewith, said method comprising the steps of: (a) Monitoring the armature current IA of said spindle motor; (b) Selecting a reference current level AIR GAP TOL (air gap tolerance) for said armature current IA below which said cutting tool is in an air gap in said workpiece; (c) Comparing the magnitude of IA+AGHYST to AGTOL, where AGHYST (air gap hysteresis) is a constant; (d) Setting the magnitude of AGHYST to a relatively low value when IA+AGHYST<AGTOL to prevent false triggering back to the condition IA+AGHYST>AGTOL due to variation in IA; (e) Increasing the feed rate of said machining operation from its programmed machining feed rate when IA+AGHYST<AGTOL to reduce the amount of time spent in traversing said air gap; (f) Setting the magnitude of AGHYST to a relatively high value when IA+AGHYST>AGTOL to prevent false triggering back to the condition IA+AGHYST<AGTOL due to variation in IA; and (g) Decreasing said feed rate back to its programmed machining feed rate when IA+AGHYST>AGTOL, which indicates that said cutting tool has re-engaged said workpiece after passing through said air gap.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
39 words
The method according to claim 9 and also including the steps of: (D 1 ) Filtering signal IA with a high gain filter when IA+AGHYST<AGTOL; and (F 1 ) Filtering signal IA with a low gain filter when IA+AGHYST>AGTOL.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US3446099A
Cited
US3571834A
Cited
US3665493A
Cited
US4031368A
Cited
US3851550A
Cited
US4031437A
Cited
US4078195A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1983-06-17 | 1983-12-17 | 1984-06-17 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 1987-06-17 | 1987-12-17 | 1988-06-17 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 1991-06-17 | 1991-12-17 | 1992-06-17 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |