US4190264A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Safety ski binding
Assignee: TMC Corp
•
Filing: 1978-04-13
•
Granted: 1980-02-26
•
Expires: 1998-04-13
Abstract
Abstract A safety release ski binding mounted in association with a sole plate construction which is pivotally secured to the upper surface of a ski for movement about a vertical axis. The locking structure for holding the sole plate construction in alignment with the longitudinal axis of the ski also effects a holding of the jaw plate and associated front jaw in a fixed position to effectively hold the ski boot in engagement with the bindings associated with the sole plate construction. The sole plate, while being pivotally secured to the ski, remains with the ski even after a release of the ski boot from engagement therewith. Upon the occurrence of a sufficient force causing the sole plate to be pivoted beyond a predefined limit, the locking structure associated with the jaw plate is released so that the front jaw is freely movable away from the ski boot to permit a release of the ski boot from engagement therewith. Thereafter, the sole plate is returned to a position axially aligned with the longitudinal axis of the ski and the front jaw returned to the position of use.
Inventors
- 👤 Alois Himmetsberger
- 👤 Heinz Wittmann
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-11-01 11:04
CPC Classifications
A; A63; A63C; A63C9/00; A63C9/08; A63C9/085; A63C9/08507; A63C9/08521; A63C9/081; A63C9/08535; A63C9/0855; A63C9/08557; A63C9/08564
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 11
Claim 1
Independent Claim
272 words
A safety ski binding comprising a pivotally supported sole plate provided adjacent a front end thereof with a jaw plate having a holding jaw pivotally supported for movement about an axis which is perpendicular with respect to an upper surface of a ski, said sole plate being maintained in a centered position at said front end by means of a locking mechanism which is released upon exceeding a predetermined torque, the improvement comprising wherein said locking mechanism has a mounting plate secured to said ski, said mounting plate having control surface means thereon which extends symmetrically with the central longitudinal axis of said ski over a two-part acute angle (α+β), said mounting plate and said control surface means lying in a plane which is substantially parallel to said upper surface of said ski, a control piece mounted on said jaw plate and engaging said control surface means, wherein one part of said acute angle (α) is predetermined by an angle the longitudinal axis of said sole plate makes with said longitudinal axis of said ski to effect a release and the size of the other part of said acute angle (β) is determined by the relationship tangent β≧μ, wherein μ is the coefficient of friction between said control surface means on said mounting plate and said control piece, and wherein said control surface extending over the other part of said acute angle (β) is oriented at the angle (α+β) to the longitudinal axis, and resilient means for biassing said control piece, following a release, rearwardly when in contact with said control surface means within said other part of said acute angle (β).
Claim 2
Dependent Claim
272 words
A safety ski binding comprising a pivotally supported sole plate provided adjacent a front end thereof with a jaw plate having a holding jaw pivotally supported for movement about an axis which is perpendicular with respect to an upper surface of a ski, said sole plate being maintained in a centered position at said front end by means of a locking mechanism which is released upon exceeding a predetermined torque, the improvement comprising wherein said locking mechanism has a mounting plate secured to said ski, said mounting plate having control surface means thereon which extends symmetrically with the central longitudinal axis of said ski over a two-part acute angle (α+β), said mounting plate and said control surface means lying in a plane which is substantially parallel to said upper surface of said ski, a control piece mounted on said jaw plate and engaging said control surface means, wherein one part of said acute angle (α) is predetermined by an angle the longitudinal axis of said sole plate makes with said longitudinal axis of said ski to effect a release and the size of the other part of said acute angle (β) is determined by the relationship tangent β≧μ, wherein μ is the coefficient of friction between said control surface means on said mounting plate and said control piece, and wherein said control surface extending over the other part of said acute angle (β) is oriented at the angle (α+β) to the longitudinal axis, and resilient means for biassing said control piece, following a release, rearwardly when in contact with said control surface means within said other part of said acute angle (β).
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
44 words
The safety ski binding according to claim 1, wherein a further spring which effects an acceleration at the start of the release operation of said jaw plate biasses said control piece only into engagement with said control surface extending over the acute angle (α).
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
66 words
The safety ski binding according to claim 1, wherein said control piece is supported on a bight surface of a generally U-shaped bar member having two legs which extend upwardly away from the upper surface of said ski, means defining axially aligned openings in said legs and receiving a rod therethrough, said rod being supported on a guide part on which is mounted said jaw plate.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
55 words
The safety ski binding according to claim 3, wherein said rod carries a thrust spring which biasses said control piece on its side which is remote from said guide part against said control surface, said thrust spring being initially compressed between a spring washer arranged on said rod and on leg of said U-shaped bar.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
59 words
The safety ski binding according to claim 3, wherein said sole plate is defined by a pair of elongated, laterally spaced and parallel bars, and wherein said resilient means is a return spring which encircles said rod, said rod being arranged laterally between a spring washer secured to said pair of bars and one leg of said U-shaped bar.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
39 words
The safety ski binding according to claim 5, wherein said guide part has a guideway which is constructed in the form of a recess, into which guideway extends a projecting shoulder part on one leg of said U-shaped part.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
54 words
The safety ski binding according to claim 6, wherein said guide part is substantially an elongated L-profile, the longer leg of which has said guideway therein and the shorter leg of which forms a bent section, supports one end of said rod and is connected to said pair of bars through said spring washer.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
77 words
The safety ski binding according to claim 7, wherein said guideway extends generally parallel to the longitudinal axis of the ski and has two tooth systems arranged on both sides thereof, and wherein a pair of swivel arms are provided with teeth which releasably engage said tooth system, said swivel arms each being pivotally supported on vertical pivot axles on said jaw plate to facilitate a longitudinal adjustment of said jaw plate relative to said guide part.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
48 words
The safety ski binding according to claim 3, wherein arms are connected to one leg of said U-shaped bar, which engages said resilient means, said arms extending parallel to the longitudinal axis of the ski and preventing a tipping of said U-shaped bar and thus said slide piece.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
61 words
The safety ski binding according to claim 3, wherein said control surface means has a generally frusto-trapezoidal configuration, said control surface means in said one part of said acute angle (α) defining a bight portion of said frusto-trapezoidal configuration and said control surface means in said other part of said acute angle (β) defining the nonparallel sides of said frusto-trapezoidal configuration.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1983-02-25 | 1983-08-27 | 1984-02-26 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 1987-02-25 | 1987-08-27 | 1988-02-26 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 1991-02-25 | 1991-08-27 | 1992-02-26 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |