US4179104A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Mechanical attenuator
Assignee: DFC New Zealand Ltd
•
Filing: 1977-01-04
•
Granted: 1979-12-18
•
Expires: 1997-01-04
Abstract
Abstract A mechanical attenuating system for preventing horizontal forces from being transmitted from a base such as the ground to a structure such as a building or a nuclear reactor resting on that base. The system has two components: a vertical support which allows free relative horizontal movement between structure and base, and horizontal damping. The two can be combined into a single instrument. When the two are used separately, the support may be supplied by rubber or rolling bearings, by flexible columns or by tendons.
Inventors
- 👤 Robert I. Skinner
- 👤 Arnold J. Heine
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-10-23 21:48
CPC Classifications
E; E04; E04H; E04H9/00; E04H9/02; E04H9/021; E04H9/0235; E04H9/0237; F; F16; F16F; F16F15/00; F16F15/02; G; G21; G21C; G21C13/00; G21C13/02; G21C13/024; G21C9/00; G21C9/04; Y; Y02; Y02E; Y02E30/00; Y02E30/30
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 15
Claim 1
Independent Claim
113 words
In a structure such as a building, a bridge or a nuclear reactor said structure resting on a base, the improvement comprising at least one support interposed between a first portion of said structure and said base, said support carrying at least a part of the weight of the structure and having flexibility in a horizontal direction of motion of at least a major portion of the structure and at least one hysteretic energy absorber connected between a further portion of said structure and a further portion of said base for absorbing horizontal accelerating forces originating from earthquakes and consequential motions, said hysteretic energy absorber being substantially unaffected by normal ambient accelerating foces.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim
113 words
In a structure such as a building, a bridge or a nuclear reactor said structure resting on a base, the improvement comprising at least one support interposed between a first portion of said structure and said base, said support carrying at least a part of the weight of the structure and having flexibility in a horizontal direction of motion of at least a major portion of the structure and at least one hysteretic energy absorber connected between a further portion of said structure and a further portion of said base for absorbing horizontal accelerating forces originating from earthquakes and consequential motions, said hysteretic energy absorber being substantially unaffected by normal ambient accelerating foces.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
15 words
The improvement as claimed in claim 1 wherein said support includes a laminated rubber bearing.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
47 words
The improvement as claimed in claim 1 wherein said at least major portion of said structure is held to the base by its weight and said flexibility in a horizontal direction consists in a freedom of a part of said structure to rock clear of the base.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
13 words
The improvement as claimed in claim 1 wherein said support includes rolling bearings.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
16 words
The improvement as claimed in claim 1 wherein said support includes a set of hanging tendons.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
16 words
The improvement as claimed in claim 1 wherein said support includes a set of slender columns.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
27 words
The improvement as claimed in claim 1 comprising at least one said flexible support and at least one said hysteretic energy absorber combined in a composite unit.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
15 words
The improvement as claimed in claim 1 wherein said flexible support includes an elastic support.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
18 words
The improvement as claimed in claim 1 wherein said hysteretic energy absorber is a torsional/flexural beam hysteretic damper.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
31 words
The improvement as claimed in claim 9 wherein said damper comprises a main beam and a pair of radially projecting remote mounting arms, one at either end of said main beam.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
50 words
The improvement as claimed in claim 9 wherein said damper comprises a main beam and a single projecting remote mounting arm at one end of said beam, the other end of said beam being adapted for direct mounting on one of the group consisting of said structure and said base.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
18 words
The improvement as claimed in claim 1, wherein said hysteretic energy absorber is a torsional beam hysteretic damper.
Claim 14
Independent Claim
123 words
A method for attenuating accelerating forces originating from earthquakes and consequential motions between a foundation and a structure such as a building, a bridge or a nuclear reactor resting thereon, comprising the steps of: (a) isolating the foundation from the structure by interposing a support between a first portion of said structure and a first portion of said foundation, said support allowing limited relative movement in a horizontal direction between said foundation and said structure, and (b) connecting a hysteretic energy absorber between a further portion of said structure and a further portion of said foundation, for absorbing horizontal accelerating forces originating from earthquakes and consequential forces imparted to said structure, said hysteretic energy absorber being substantially unaffected by normal ambient accelerating forces.
Claim 15
Independent Claim
123 words
A method for attenuating accelerating forces originating from earthquakes and consequential motions between a foundation and a structure such as a building, a bridge or a nuclear reactor resting thereon, comprising the steps of: (a) isolating the foundation from the structure by interposing a support between a first portion of said structure and a first portion of said foundation, said support allowing limited relative movement in a horizontal direction between said foundation and said structure, and (b) connecting a hysteretic energy absorber between a further portion of said structure and a further portion of said foundation, for absorbing horizontal accelerating forces originating from earthquakes and consequential forces imparted to said structure, said hysteretic energy absorber being substantially unaffected by normal ambient accelerating forces.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US3831924A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1982-12-17 | 1983-06-18 | 1983-12-18 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 1986-12-17 | 1987-06-18 | 1987-12-18 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 1990-12-17 | 1991-06-18 | 1991-12-18 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |