Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 24
Claim 1
Independent Claim
118 words
A method of making flaked metal powders having a narrow particle size distribution and a very high sparkle effect wherein a heterogenous liquid system comprising an inert liquid and a lubricant and including at least one finely divided metal capable of being flaked is subjected to attrition in an enclosure in which there are a plurality of attritive elements, an agitator being moved through the elements to displace those in its path, wherein the weight ratio of attritive elements to finely divided metal is between 70:1 and 90:1, the weight ratio of finely divided metal to lubricant is between 100:1 to 20:1 and the weight ratio of inert liquid to finely divided metal is between 0.5:1 to 2.5:1.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
118 words
A method of making flaked metal powders having a narrow particle size distribution and a very high sparkle effect wherein a heterogenous liquid system comprising an inert liquid and a lubricant and including at least one finely divided metal capable of being flaked is subjected to attrition in an enclosure in which there are a plurality of attritive elements, an agitator being moved through the elements to displace those in its path, wherein the weight ratio of attritive elements to finely divided metal is between 70:1 and 90:1, the weight ratio of finely divided metal to lubricant is between 100:1 to 20:1 and the weight ratio of inert liquid to finely divided metal is between 0.5:1 to 2.5:1.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
36 words
A method according to claim 1, wherein said agitator is made up of a plurality of rotating arms, said attritive elements are present in said enclosure in an amount sufficient to substantially cover the uppermost arm.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
21 words
A method according to claim 1, wherein the volume ratio of attritive elements to inert liquid is between 70:1 and 3:1.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
21 words
A method according to claim 1, wherein the weight ratio of inert liquid to finely divided metal is 0.5:1 to 2.0:1.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
62 words
A method according to claim 3, wherein the weight ratio of attritive elements to finely divided metal is between 75:1 to 87:1, the weight ratio of finely divided metal to lubricant is 30:1 to 20:1, the weight ratio of inert liquid to finely divided metal is 0.5:1 to 1.5:1, the volume ratio of attritive elements to inert liquid is 40:1 to 5:1.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
62 words
A method according to claim 3, wherein the weight ratio of attritive elements to finely divided metal is about 78:1 to 85:1, the weight ratio of finely divided metal to lubricant is about 20:1, the weight ratio of inert liquid to finely divided metal is about 0.5:1 to 1:1, and the volume ratio of attritive elements to inert liquid is about 8:1.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
33 words
A method according to claim 2, wherein said attrition lasts between about 5 minutes and about 120 minutes and is carried out at a temperature between about 37° C. and about 50° C.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
47 words
A method according to claim 1, wherein a separate container is provided for the finished flake metal particles, and comprising the step of feeding said flake metal particles into said separate container and recirculating insufficiently flaked particles into said enclosure, until a uniform size distribution is obtained.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
21 words
A method according to claim 6, wherein said insufficiently flaked particles are recirculated into said enclosure by means of a pump.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
51 words
A method according to claim 8, wherein after grinding the particles are subjected to a preliminary screening step in order to separate the particles which have been milled to required size, while oversize particles are sent to the separate container from which they are pumped towards the enclosure for further milling.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
50 words
A method according to claim 8, wherein ground particles are pumped from the bottom part of the enclosure to be sent to the separate container where the uniform size flaked particles are separated and those which are insufficiently flaked are recirculated to the enclosure by means of a second pump.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
28 words
A method according to claim 1, wherein said finely divided metal capable of being flaked has been pre-milled in a tube mill before being introduced in said enclosure.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
13 words
A method according to claim 1, wherein said finely divided metal is aluminum.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim
26 words
A method according to claim 1, wherein said finely divided metal is selected from the group consisting of copper, brass, bronze, stainless steel, nickel, cupro nickel.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim
22 words
A method according to claim 1, wherein said attritive elements comprise metallic balls having diameters between about 0.8 mm and 25.0 mm.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim
28 words
A method according to claim 1, which comprises suspending particles which have been subjected to attrition and removing therefrom flaked metal powders having a narrow particle size distribution.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim
63 words
Flaked aluminum powders having a narrow particle size distribution and a very high sparkle effect, having color whiteness readings between about 69 and 74, after screening, as measured by the Colormaster V, manufactured by MEECO, and, also after screening, having a high uniformity of particles as established by the fact that they contain no more than 0.1% of +325 Mesh particles (44 microns).
Claim 19
Dependent Claim
63 words
Flaked aluminum powders having a narrow particle size distribution and a very high sparkle effect, having color whiteness readings between about 69 and 74, after screening, as measured by the Colormaster V, manufactured by MEECO, and, also after screening, having a high uniformity of particles as established by the fact that they contain no more than 0.1% of +325 Mesh particles (44 microns).
Claim 20
Dependent Claim
80 words
Flaked nickel powders having a narrow particle size distribution and very high sparkle effect, after screening, a water coverage of between about 3000 and 5000 cm 2 /g as measured by the method described in "Aluminum Paint and Powder" by Edwards & Roy, Reinhold Publishing Company (1955), pp. 39, 40 and 41, and also after screening, having a high uniformity of particles as established by the fact that they contain no more than 0.1%, of +325 Mesh particles (44 microns).
Claim 21
Dependent Claim
80 words
Flaked nickel powders having a narrow particle size distribution and very high sparkle effect, after screening, a water coverage of between about 3000 and 5000 cm 2 /g as measured by the method described in "Aluminum Paint and Powder" by Edwards & Roy, Reinhold Publishing Company (1955), pp. 39, 40 and 41, and also after screening, having a high uniformity of particles as established by the fact that they contain no more than 0.1%, of +325 Mesh particles (44 microns).
Claim 22
Dependent Claim
80 words
Flaked brass powders having a narrow particle size distribution and very high sparkle effect, after screening, a water coverage of between about 1000 and 5000 cm 2 /g as measured by the method described in "Aluminum Paint and Powder" by Edwards & Roy, Reinhold Publishing Company (1955), pp. 39, 40 and 41, and also after screening having a high uniformity of particles as established by the fact that they contain no more than 0.1%, of +325 Mesh particles (44 microns).
Claim 23
Dependent Claim
80 words
Flaked brass powders having a narrow particle size distribution and very high sparkle effect, after screening, a water coverage of between about 1000 and 5000 cm 2 /g as measured by the method described in "Aluminum Paint and Powder" by Edwards & Roy, Reinhold Publishing Company (1955), pp. 39, 40 and 41, and also after screening having a high uniformity of particles as established by the fact that they contain no more than 0.1%, of +325 Mesh particles (44 microns).
Claim 24
Dependent Claim
44 words
Flaked aluminum powders according to claim 16, having a water coverage of between about 1575 and 12,000 cm 2 /g as measured by the method described in "Aluminum Paint and Powder" by Edwards & Roy, Reinhold Publishing Company (1955), pp. 39, 40 and 41.