US4169283A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Step-control of electromechanical systems
Assignee: United States Department of Energy
•
Filing: 1977-04-04
•
Granted: 1979-09-25
•
Expires: 1997-04-04
Abstract
Abstract The response of an automatic control system to a general input signal is improved by applying a test input signal, observing the response to the test input signal and determining correctional constants necessary to provide a modified input signal to be added to the input to the system. A method is disclosed for determining correctional constants. The modified input signal, when applied in conjunction with an operating signal, provides a total system output exhibiting an improved response. This method is applicable to open-loop or closed-loop control systems. The method is also applicable to unstable systems, thus allowing controlled shut-down before dangerous or destructive response is achieved and to systems whose characteristics vary with time, thus resulting in improved adaptive systems.
Inventors
- 👤 Robert N. Lewis
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-10-26 05:44
CPC Classifications
G; G05; G05B; G05B13/00; G05B13/02
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 21
Claim 1
Independent Claim
96 words
A method of improving the response of an automatic control system to a general input signal that is a function of time, the method comprising: a. applying a test input signal to the system; b. obtaining a test output signal corresponding to the test input signal; c. determining values of correctional quantities from the test output signal according to a predetermined scheme; d. generating correctional signals from the correctional quantities; e. adding the correctional signals to the general input signal to obtain a modified input signal; and f. applying the modified input signal to the system.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
96 words
A method of improving the response of an automatic control system to a general input signal that is a function of time, the method comprising: a. applying a test input signal to the system; b. obtaining a test output signal corresponding to the test input signal; c. determining values of correctional quantities from the test output signal according to a predetermined scheme; d. generating correctional signals from the correctional quantities; e. adding the correctional signals to the general input signal to obtain a modified input signal; and f. applying the modified input signal to the system.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
14 words
The method of claim 1 wherein the test input signal comprises a step signal.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
176 words
The method of claim 2 wherein determining values of correctional quantities comprises the following steps: a. determining system gain K; b. determining time T s required to achieve a first peak of an output signal in response to the unit step input signal; c. determining percent response P at the time T s in response to the unit step input signal; d. determining percent response U at the time T s in response to a unit ramp input signal; e. determining percent response W at the time T s in response to a unit parabolic input signal; f. calculating a quantity N=(1-P)/p; g. calculating a quantity L=T.sub.s (1-U)/P; h. calculating a quantity ##EQU10## i. measuring amplitude S of the general input signal at a test time; j. measuring time rate of change v of the general input signal at the test time; k. measuring second time derivative a of the general input signal at the test time; and l. calculating the quantity SN+vL+aM, which quantity has a value equal to the value of the correctional signal.
Claim 5
Independent Claim
105 words
A method of improving the response of a feedback control system having an error signal to a general input signal that is a function of time t, the method comprising: a. applying a test input signal to the system; b. determining a test error response to the test input signal; c. determining values of correctional signals from the test error response according to a predetermined scheme; d. generating correctional signals equal to the determined values; e. adding the correctional signals to the error signal to obtain a modified error signal; and f. applying the modified error signal to the system to replace the error signal.
Claim 6
Independent Claim
105 words
A method of improving the response of a feedback control system having an error signal to a general input signal that is a function of time t, the method comprising: a. applying a test input signal to the system; b. determining a test error response to the test input signal; c. determining values of correctional signals from the test error response according to a predetermined scheme; d. generating correctional signals equal to the determined values; e. adding the correctional signals to the error signal to obtain a modified error signal; and f. applying the modified error signal to the system to replace the error signal.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
13 words
The method of claim 4 wherein the test input signal is a step.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
171 words
The method of claim 5 wherein the step of determining values of correctional signals comprises: a. determining a system gain K; b. determining a time T s required to achieve a first peak of an output signal in response to the test step input signal; c. determining a percent response P at the time T s in response to the test input signal; d. determining percent response U at the time T s in response to a unit ramp input signal; e. determining percent response W at the time T s in response to a unit parabolic input signal; f. determining a quantity N=(1-P)/P; g. determining a quantity L=T.sub.s (1-U)/P; h. measuring a value ε 0 of the error signal at a time t 0 ; i. measuring a value ε 0 of the time rate of change of the error signal at the time t 0 ; j. determining a quantity ##EQU11## k. determining a quantity ##EQU12## and l. determining a quanity F=E+Dt, which quantity is the desired correctional signal.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
127 words
The method of claim 5 wherein the step of determining values of correctional signals comprises: a. determining a time T 1 to achieve a first positive peak of an output signal in response to the test step input signal; b. determining a percent response P 1 to the test step input signal at time T 1 ; c. determining a time T 2 to achieve a first relative minimum in response to the test step input signal; d. determining a percent response P 2 to the test step input signal at time T 2 ; e. determining the quantities Q.sub.1 =(P.sub.1 -1), q.sub.2 =(p.sub.2 -1)/q.sub.1, and R.sub.1 =(T.sub.2 -T.sub.1); and f. comparing the values of Q 1 with Q 2 and T 1 with R 1 .
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
173 words
The method of claim 7 comprising in addition the following: a. finding that Q 1 =Q 2 and T 1 =R 1 to establish that the feedback control system is a second-order system without a dominant pole or zero; b. determining a system gain K; c. determining percent response U at time T 1 in response to a unit ramp input signal; d. determining percent response W at time T 1 in response to a unit parabolic input signal; e. determining a quantity N 1 =(1-P 1 )/P 1 ; f. determining a quantity L 1 =T 1 (1-U)/P 1 ; g. measuring a value ε 0 of the error signal at a time t 0 ; h. measuring a value ε 0 of the time rate of change of the error signal at the time t 0 ; determining a quantity ##EQU13## j. determining a quantity ##EQU14## and k. determining a quantity F.sub.1 =E.sub.1 +D.sub.1 t, which quantity is the desired correctional signal to be applied for the time T s .
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
82 words
The method of claim 7 comprising in addition the following: a. determining a time T 3 to achieve a second positive peak of the output signal in response to the test step input signal; b. determining a percent response P 3 to the test step input signal at time T 3 ; c. determining the quantities Q.sub.3 =(P.sub.3 -P.sub.2)/(P.sub.2 -P.sub.1) r.sub.2 =(t.sub.3 -t.sub.2); and d. comparing the values of Q 3 with Q 2 and of R 2 with R 1 .
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
161 words
The method of claim 9 comprising in addition: a. finding that Q 3 =Q 2 <Q 1 and that R 2 =R 1 >T 1 to establish that the feedback control system is a second-order system with a dominant real zero; b. determining a system gain K; c. determining percent response U 1 at the time R 1 in response to a unit ramp input signal; d. determining percent response W 1 at the time R 1 in response to a unit parabolic input signal; e. calculating a quantity N.sub.0 =(1-Q.sub.2)/Q.sub.2 ; f. determining a quantity L.sub.0 =R.sub.1 (1-U.sub.1)/Q.sub.2 ; g. measuring a value ε 1 of the error signal at a time t 1 ; h. measuring a value ε 1 of the error signal at the time t 1 ; i. determining a quantity D.sub.0 =ε.sub.1 (1-Q.sub.2)/Q.sub.2 ; j. determining a quantity ##EQU15## and k. determining a quantity F.sub.1 =E.sub.0 +D.sub.0 t, which quantity is the desired correctional signal.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
226 words
The method of claim 9 comprising in addition: a. finding that Q 2 >Q 1 and that R 1 ≦T 1 to establish that the system is a second-order system with a dominant real pole; b. inserting a lead circuit in series with the input signal to cancel the pole; c. determining system gain K; d. determining a time T 11 to achieve a first positive peak of an output signal of the system with a lead circuit in response to the test step input signal; e. determining a percent response P 11 to the test step input signal at time T 11 ; f. determining a percent response U 11 at time T 11 in response to a unit ramp signal; g. determining a percent response W 11 in response to a unit parabolic input signal; h. determining a quantity N.sub.11 =(1-P.sub.11)/P.sub.11 ; i. determining a quantity L.sub.11 =T.sub.11 (1-U.sub.11)/P.sub.11 ; j. measuring a value ε 11 of the error signal at a time t 11 ;; k. measuring a value ε 11 of the time rate of change of the error signal at the time t 0 ; l. determining a quantity D.sub.11 =ε.sub.11 (1-P.sub.11)/P.sub.11 ; m. determining a quantity ##EQU16## and n. determining a quantity F.sub.11 =E.sub.11 +D.sub.11 t, which quantity is the desired correctional signal for the time interval T s .
Claim 14
Independent Claim
243 words
An apparatus for insertion in cascade with an open-loop system 149 for processing an input signal 141, the apparatus comprising: a. a summing amplifier 142 receiving the input signal 141 and delivering a summed output signal to the system 149; b. a first differentiator 153 receiving the input signal 141 and differentiating the input signal 141 with respect to time; c. a first scaler 154 connected to the first differentiator 153 and the summing amplifier 142, the first scaler 154 receiving a differentiated input signal and delivering a scaled differentiated signal as an input to the summing amplifier 142; d. a second differentiator 156 connected to the first differentiator 153 to receive the differentiated input signal and produce a twice-differentiated input signal; e. a second scaler 159 connected to the second differentiator 156 and the summing amplifier 142 to receive the twice-differentiated signal and produce a scaled twice-differentiated signal that is delivered to the summing amplifier 142; f. a fourth scaler 155 receiving the input signal to produce a scaled inverted input signal; g. a gate 150 connected to the fourth scaler 155 and the summing amplifier 142 to gate the scaled inverted input signal; h. a threshold detector 151 connected with the first differentiator 153 to produce a threshold signal in response to the differentiated signal; and i. a monostable 152 connected to the threshold detector 151 and the gate 150 to control the gate 150 in response to the threshold signal.
Claim 15
Independent Claim
243 words
An apparatus for insertion in cascade with an open-loop system 149 for processing an input signal 141, the apparatus comprising: a. a summing amplifier 142 receiving the input signal 141 and delivering a summed output signal to the system 149; b. a first differentiator 153 receiving the input signal 141 and differentiating the input signal 141 with respect to time; c. a first scaler 154 connected to the first differentiator 153 and the summing amplifier 142, the first scaler 154 receiving a differentiated input signal and delivering a scaled differentiated signal as an input to the summing amplifier 142; d. a second differentiator 156 connected to the first differentiator 153 to receive the differentiated input signal and produce a twice-differentiated input signal; e. a second scaler 159 connected to the second differentiator 156 and the summing amplifier 142 to receive the twice-differentiated signal and produce a scaled twice-differentiated signal that is delivered to the summing amplifier 142; f. a fourth scaler 155 receiving the input signal to produce a scaled inverted input signal; g. a gate 150 connected to the fourth scaler 155 and the summing amplifier 142 to gate the scaled inverted input signal; h. a threshold detector 151 connected with the first differentiator 153 to produce a threshold signal in response to the differentiated signal; and i. a monostable 152 connected to the threshold detector 151 and the gate 150 to control the gate 150 in response to the threshold signal.
Claim 16
Independent Claim
281 words
An apparatus for insertion within a feedback loop of a feedback control system to provide sampled signal modification, the apparatus comprising: a. a summing amplifier 354 connected between a summer of a feedback system and the system, the summing amplifier 354 receiving as an input an error signal from the summer, the summing amplifier 354 delivering an output to the system; b. a scaler 355 connected to the summer to receive as an input the error signal from the summer, the scaler 355 producing as an output a scaled error signal; c. a differentiator 357 connected to the scaler 355 to produce a differentiated scaled error signal; d. a clock 362 to produce a timing impulse; e. a monostable 361 connected to the clock 362 and responsive to the timing impulse to produce a timed pulse train; f. a first sample-holder 358 connected to the differentiator 357 and the monostable 361 to produce a first sample-holder signal controlled by the timed pulse train; g. a second scaler 359 connected to the first sample-holder 358 and the summing amplifier 354 to deliver a scaled first sample-holder signal as an input to the summing amplifier 354; h. an integrator 360 connected to the first sample-holder 358 and the summing amplifier 354 to couple an integrated first sample-holder signal to the summing amplifier 354; i. a gate 369 connected to the monostable 361, the integrator 360, and summing amplifier 354 to discharge the integrator 360 at periodic intervals; and j. a second sample-holder 356 connected to the scaler 355 the summing amplifier 354, and the monostable 361 to couple a sampled signal from scaler 355 to summing amplifier 354 as timed by monostable 361.
Claim 17
Independent Claim
281 words
An apparatus for insertion within a feedback loop of a feedback control system to provide sampled signal modification, the apparatus comprising: a. a summing amplifier 354 connected between a summer of a feedback system and the system, the summing amplifier 354 receiving as an input an error signal from the summer, the summing amplifier 354 delivering an output to the system; b. a scaler 355 connected to the summer to receive as an input the error signal from the summer, the scaler 355 producing as an output a scaled error signal; c. a differentiator 357 connected to the scaler 355 to produce a differentiated scaled error signal; d. a clock 362 to produce a timing impulse; e. a monostable 361 connected to the clock 362 and responsive to the timing impulse to produce a timed pulse train; f. a first sample-holder 358 connected to the differentiator 357 and the monostable 361 to produce a first sample-holder signal controlled by the timed pulse train; g. a second scaler 359 connected to the first sample-holder 358 and the summing amplifier 354 to deliver a scaled first sample-holder signal as an input to the summing amplifier 354; h. an integrator 360 connected to the first sample-holder 358 and the summing amplifier 354 to couple an integrated first sample-holder signal to the summing amplifier 354; i. a gate 369 connected to the monostable 361, the integrator 360, and summing amplifier 354 to discharge the integrator 360 at periodic intervals; and j. a second sample-holder 356 connected to the scaler 355 the summing amplifier 354, and the monostable 361 to couple a sampled signal from scaler 355 to summing amplifier 354 as timed by monostable 361.
Claim 18
Independent Claim
87 words
An apparatus for improving the response of an automatic control system to a general input signal that is a function of time, the apparatus comprising: a. means for applying a test input signal to the system; b. means for determining correctional signals from a response to the test input signal; c. means for generating the correctional signals; d. means for adding the correctional signals to the general input signal to produce a modified input signal; and e. means for applying the modified input signal to the system.
Claim 19
Independent Claim
87 words
An apparatus for improving the response of an automatic control system to a general input signal that is a function of time, the apparatus comprising: a. means for applying a test input signal to the system; b. means for determining correctional signals from a response to the test input signal; c. means for generating the correctional signals; d. means for adding the correctional signals to the general input signal to produce a modified input signal; and e. means for applying the modified input signal to the system.
Claim 20
Independent Claim
86 words
An apparatus for improving the response of a feedback control system having an error signal to a general input signal, the apparatus comprising; a. means for applying a test input signal to the system; b. means for determining an error response to the test input signal; c. means for determining values of correctional signals from the error response; d. means for generating correctional signals equal to the values; and e. means for adding the correctional signals to the error signal to obtain a modified error signal.
Claim 21
Independent Claim
86 words
An apparatus for improving the response of a feedback control system having an error signal to a general input signal, the apparatus comprising; a. means for applying a test input signal to the system; b. means for determining an error response to the test input signal; c. means for determining values of correctional signals from the error response; d. means for generating correctional signals equal to the values; and e. means for adding the correctional signals to the error signal to obtain a modified error signal.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1982-09-24 | 1983-03-26 | 1983-09-25 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 1986-09-24 | 1987-03-26 | 1987-09-25 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 1990-09-24 | 1991-03-26 | 1991-09-25 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |