US4154530A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Laser beam error correcting process
Assignee: National Semiconductor Corp
•
Filing: 1977-12-22
•
Granted: 1979-05-15
•
Expires: 1997-12-22
Abstract
Abstract A laser beam is employed to trim monolithic integrated circuits in wafer form in a step and repeat machine. The step and repeat action is adjusted to bring successive circuits on the wafer into trimming relationship with the laser. The circuit is measured and trimming accomplished to adjust the circuit performance to a precise specification. The step and repeat operation introduces a small error that accumulates as stepping proceeds. A laser beam error detector pattern is incorporated into the integrated circuit wafer and is designed to produce a response when the beam impingement error exceeds a predetermined value. The detector output causes the laser beam to be translated by an increment equal to the error and in the opposite direction. As a result, the laser beam aiming error is controlled by a known pattern rather than by an unknown cumulative error.
Inventors
- 👤 Joseph J. Connolly, Jr.
- 👤 Thomas M. Frederiksen
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-10-23 12:32
CPC Classifications
H; H10; H10P; H10P72/00; H10P72/06; H10P72/0604
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 11
Claim 1
Independent Claim
133 words
The process for correcting beam alignment errors in automatic equipment employing an energy beam in the sequential treatment of critical areas on a workpiece, said process comprising the steps: locating error detection means at predetermined locations on said workpiece, said error detection means providing an indication of said beam alignment; stepping said workpiece relative to the impingement area of said energy beam to bring successive areas of said workpiece into working relationship with said energy beam; directing said energy beam at said error detection means; correcting the aiming of said energy beam relative to said workpiece in response to said indication from said error detection means; and, following the step of correcting the aiming of said energy beam, redirecting said energy beam to said critical area on said workpiece to effect working thereof.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim
133 words
The process for correcting beam alignment errors in automatic equipment employing an energy beam in the sequential treatment of critical areas on a workpiece, said process comprising the steps: locating error detection means at predetermined locations on said workpiece, said error detection means providing an indication of said beam alignment; stepping said workpiece relative to the impingement area of said energy beam to bring successive areas of said workpiece into working relationship with said energy beam; directing said energy beam at said error detection means; correcting the aiming of said energy beam relative to said workpiece in response to said indication from said error detection means; and, following the step of correcting the aiming of said energy beam, redirecting said energy beam to said critical area on said workpiece to effect working thereof.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
36 words
The process of claim 1 in which said error detection means is operated to provide an indication when said error exceeds a predetermined magnitude and said correcting step corrects by the amount of said predetermined magnitude.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
48 words
The process of claim 2 wherein said error detection means additionally detects the direction of said error and wherein the step of correcting the aiming of said energy beam includes determining the direction of said error and correcting the aiming of said energy beam oppositely to said error.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
26 words
The process of claim 3 wherein said step of directing said energy beam at said error detection means includes the step of pulsing said energy beam.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
24 words
The process of claim 4 further including the step of translating said beam while a plurality of pulses is applied from said energy beam.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
21 words
The process of claim 5 wherein said translation is adjusted to produce overlapping of said plurality of pulses on said workpiece.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
32 words
The process of claim 1 wherein said correcting step includes translating and pulsing said laser until said detector produces said indication thereby to locate said beam with precision relative to said detector.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
21 words
The process of claim 7 wherein said translating and said pulsing are operated to produce an overlapping laser beam impingement pattern.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
19 words
The process of claim 8 wherein said pulsing and translation are operated to locate said beam in two directions.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
9 words
The product produced by the process of claim 1.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US2352179A
Cited
US3316800A
Cited
US3401589A
Cited
US3388461A
Cited
US3699649A
Cited
US3758745A
Cited
US3838274A
Cited
US3989385A
Cited
US3966329A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1982-05-14 | 1982-11-13 | 1983-05-15 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 1986-05-14 | 1986-11-13 | 1987-05-15 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 1990-05-14 | 1990-11-13 | 1991-05-15 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |