Process for dust reduction treatment of expanded perlite

Claim 2

A process for bonding the dust particles of dry perlite which has been expanded in an expansion oven at about 1100° C. comprising: (a) removing the expanded perlite from said expansion oven in a continuous free flowing stream; (b) removing a substantial part of said expanded perlite having a grain size smaller than about 0.2 millimeters in a vortex separator; (c) cooling the expanded perlite to a temperature of less than 130° C.; (d) passing the expanded perlite at less than 130° C. in a loose free flowing stream past a spray head; and (e) spraying a finely atomized paraffin hydrocarbon having a viscosity of from about 4 to about 8 centistokes measured at 20° C. from said spray head upon said expanded perlite flowing therepast.

Claim 3

The process recited in claim 1 further comprising: (a) cooling the expanded perlite to an intermediate temperature greater than 250° C; (b) passing the expanded perlite in a loose free flowing stream at an intermediate temperature greater than 250° C. past a second spray head located between said expansion oven and said spray head; (c) spraying a finely atomized liquid water repellent from said second spray head upon said expanded perlite flowing therepast; and then (e) performing steps (c), (d) and (e) of claim 1.

Claim 4

The process recited in claim 2 further comprising: (a) passing said expanded perlite through a blower between said expansion furnace and said vortex separator; (b) discharging at least part of the expanded perlite particles having a diameter of less than 0.2 mm. from said vortex separator; and (c) passing the remainder of said expanded perlite to said second spray head.

Claim 5

The process recited in claim 1 further comprising said paraffin hydrocarbon being in the proportion of from about 2 to about 10 kilogrammes per cubic meter of perlite.

Claim 6

The process recited in claim 1 further comprising said paraffin hydrocarbon being sprayed at a temperature of less than 130° C.

Claim 7

The process recited in claim 3 further comprising said liquid water repellent being sprayed at a temperature greater than 250° C.

Claim 8

A process for bonding the dust particles of dry perlite which has been expanded in an expansion oven at about 1100° C. comprising: (a) removing the expanded perlite from said expansion oven; (b) passing said expanded perlite through a vortex separator; (c) discharging at least part of the expanded perlite particles having a diameter of less than 0.2 mm from said vortex separator; (d) cooling the remainder of said expanded perlite to a temperature greater than 250° C.; (e) passing the expanded perlite in a loose free flowing stream at a temperature greater than 250° C. past a first spray head; (f) spraying a finely atomized liquid water repellent at a temperature greater than 250° C. from said first spray head upon said expanded perlite flowing therepast; then (g) further cooling the expanded perlite to a temperature of less than 130° C.; (h) passing the expanded perlite at less than 130° C. in a loose free flowing stream past a second spray head; (i) spraying a finely atomized paraffin hydrocarbon at a temperature of less than 130° C. from said second spray head upon said expanded perlite flowing therepast; (j) said paraffin hydrocarbon having a viscosity of from about 4 to about 8 centistokes measured at 20° C.; and (k) said paraffin hydrocarbon being sprayed in the proportion of from about 2 to about 10 kilogrammes per cubic meter of expanded perlite.

Claim 9

A process for bonding the dust particles of dry perlite which has been expanded in an expansion oven at about 1100° C. comprising: (a) removing the expanded perlite from said expansion oven; (b) passing said expanded perlite through a vortex separator; (c) discharging at least part of the expanded perlite particles having a diameter of less than 0.2 mm from said vortex separator; (d) cooling the remainder of said expanded perlite to a temperature greater than 250° C.; (e) passing the expanded perlite in a loose free flowing stream at a temperature greater than 250° C. past a first spray head; (f) spraying a finely atomized liquid water repellent at a temperature greater than 250° C. from said first spray head upon said expanded perlite flowing therepast; then (g) further cooling the expanded perlite to a temperature of less than 130° C.; (h) passing the expanded perlite at less than 130° C. in a loose free flowing stream past a second spray head; (i) spraying a finely atomized paraffin hydrocarbon at a temperature of less than 130° C. from said second spray head upon said expanded perlite flowing therepast; (j) said paraffin hydrocarbon having a viscosity of from about 4 to about 8 centistokes measured at 20° C.; and (k) said paraffin hydrocarbon being sprayed in the proportion of from about 2 to about 10 kilogrammes per cubic meter of expanded perlite.

Claim 10

The process recited in claim 1 wherein said temperature of less than 130° C. is less than 100° C.

Claim 11

The process recited in claim 1 wherein the fraction of said perlite from said cyclone separator having a diameter of less than 0.2 millimeters is less than 10 percent.

Claim 12

The process recited in claim 7 wherein said temperature of less than 130° C. is less than 100° C.

Claim 13

The process recited in claim 7 wherein the fraction of said perlite from said cyclone separator having a diameter of less than 0.2 millimeters is less than 10 percent.