US4148712A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Metals passivation with catalyst fines
Assignee: Phillips Petroleum Co
•
Filing: 1978-06-29
•
Granted: 1979-04-10
•
Expires: 1998-06-29
Abstract
Abstract Used cracking catalyst fines from a cracking process wherein antimony or a compound thereof is used as a metals passivation agent are used as an efficient passivation agent in a cracking process.
Inventors
- 👤 Richard H. Nielsen
- 👤 Dwight L. McKay
- 👤 Glenn H. Dale
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-10-30 20:12
CPC Classifications
C; C10; C10G; C10G11/00; C10G11/02; C10G11/04
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 13
Claim 1
Independent Claim
46 words
A cracking process which comprises contacting a hydrocarbon feedstock, a cracking catalyst and as an added passivating agent used antimony containing cracking catalyst fines under hydrocarbon cracking conditions to produce a cracked hydrocarbon mixture and recovering said cracked hydrocarbon mixture as the product of the process.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim
46 words
A cracking process which comprises contacting a hydrocarbon feedstock, a cracking catalyst and as an added passivating agent used antimony containing cracking catalyst fines under hydrocarbon cracking conditions to produce a cracked hydrocarbon mixture and recovering said cracked hydrocarbon mixture as the product of the process.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
41 words
A cracking process in accordance with claim 1 wherein said used catalyst fines have been removed from a hydrocarbon cracking process in which antimony or antimony compounds have been used to mitigate detrimental effects of metals on this hydrocarbon cracking process.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
23 words
A cracking process in accordance with claim 1 wherein said catalyst fines have an antimony content of about 0.4 to 10 weight percent.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
29 words
A cracking process in accordance with claim 1 wherein said cracking catalyst fines have a particle size to pass essentially completely through a sieve of 325 mesh (U.S. Sieve).
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
204 words
A cracking process in accordance with claim 2 wherein said hydrocarbon cracking process comprises contacting a first hydrocarbon feedstock in a first cracking zone of a first cracking-regeneration loop comprising said first cracking zone and a first regeneration zone with a first cracking catalyst under hydrocarbon cracking conditions and in the presence of antimony or an antimony compound to form a first cracked hydrocarbon mixture that is withdrawn from said first cracking zone, wherein first cracking catalyst from said first cracking zone is contacted in said first regeneration zone with a free oxygen-containing gas under regeneration conditions to form regenerated first cracking catalyst, wherein used catalyst fines containing antimony are withdrawn from said first loop, wherein in a second cracking-regeneration loop comprising a second cracking zone and a second regeneration zone, a second hydrocarbon feedstock is contacted in said second cracking zone under cracking conditions with a second cracking catalyst and with said used catalyst fines containing antimony to form a second cracked hydrocarbon mixture that is withdrawn from said second cracking zone, and wherein second cracking catalyst from said second cracking zone is contacted in said second regeneration zone with a free oxygen-containing gas under regeneration conditions to form regenerated second cracking catalyst.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
33 words
A process in accordance with claim 5 wherein said regenerated first cracking catalyst is reintroduced into said first cracking zone, and wherein regenerated second cracking catalyst is reintroduced into said second cracking zone.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
81 words
A process in accordance with claim 5 wherein said first cracked hydrocarbon mixture containing used cracking catalyst fines containing antimony is separated in a separation zone to form a hydrocarbon effluent essentially free of cracking catalyst fines and a slurry oil effluent consisting essentially of an oil and used cracking catalyst fines, and wherein said used cracking catalyst fines of said slurry oil effluent are contacted with said second hydrocarbon feedstock and said second cracking catalyst in said second cracking zone.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
24 words
A process in accordance with claim 7 wherein at least a portion of said slurry oil effluent is introduced into said second cracking zone.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
27 words
A process in accordance with claim 5 wherein said antimony or antimony compound and said first hydrocarbon feedstock are combined and introduced into said first cracking zone.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
21 words
A process in accordance with claim 9 wherein said antimony compound is an antimony compound soluble in said first hydrocarbon feedstock.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
16 words
A process in accordance with claim 10 wherein said antimony compound is an organic antimony thiophosphate.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
15 words
A process in accordance with claim 11 wherein said antimony compound is antimony tris(O,O-dihydrocarbyl dithiophosphate).
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US3135683A
Cited
US3190828A
Cited
US3303123A
Cited
US3591485A
Cited
US3711422A
Cited
US3849294A
Cited
US3928173A
Cited
US3904509A
Cited
US4025458A
Cited
US4036740A
Cited
US4111845A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1982-04-09 | 1982-10-09 | 1983-04-10 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 1986-04-09 | 1986-10-09 | 1987-04-10 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 1990-04-09 | 1990-10-09 | 1991-04-10 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |