US4143170A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Method of making a non-foaming low-calorie sweetening composition
Assignee: General Foods Corp
•
Filing: 1976-06-21
•
Granted: 1979-03-06
•
Expires: 1996-06-21
Abstract
Abstract Combining an effective amount of an antifoaming agent with other ingredients of a sugar substitute sweetener by co-spray drying the defoamer with a minor amount of these ingredients such that the defoamer is present in excessive amounts, and thereafter blending the co-dried material with the remaining major amount of the sugar substitute ingredients to bring the concentration back to an effective, but non-excessive amount, results in a bulked low-calorie sweetening composition which is not only readily soluble and non-foaming, but is devoid of any appreciable change in desirable physical characteristics such as density and flowability.
Inventors
- 👤 Thomas P. Finucane
- 👤 Ernest L. Earle, Jr.
- 👤 Alan H. Dworetzky
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-11-03 12:21
CPC Classifications
A; A23; A23L; A23L27/00; A23L27/30; A23L27/31; A23L27/32; Y; Y10; Y10S; Y10S426/00; Y10S426/804
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 12
Claim 1
Independent Claim
233 words
An improved method for producing a readily dispersible, non-foaming, low-calorie bulked sweetener composition comprising a co-dried edible bulking agent, and a low-calorie sweetening composition which contains an effective amount of a defoaming agent so as to retard foaming and a sweetening agent selected from the group consisting of saccharin, cyclamates, and L-aspartic acid derivatives, and combinations thereof, comprising the steps of (a) forming a first sweetening solution of a minor amount of an edible bulking agent, and an amount of defoaming agent greater than or equal to the effective amount to retard foam basis the total bulk sweetening composition, and a sweetener selected from the group consisting of saccharin, cyclamates, and L-aspartic acid derivatives and combinations thereof; (b) spray drying the first sweetener solution; (c) forming a second sweetening solution containing a major amount of the edible bulking agent, and a quantity of defoaming agent from 0 to less than effective amount to retard foaming and a sweetener selected from the group consisting of saccharin, cyclamates, and L-aspartic acid derivatives and combinations thereof; (d) spray drying the second sweetening solution; (e) blending the spray dried first and second dried sweetening solutions to derive a total bulked sweetening composition containing an effective amount of defoaming agent to retard foaming and having minimal change in density and flowability compared to bulked sweetening compositions wherein all defoaming agents, sweetening agents, and bulking agents are dried together.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim
233 words
An improved method for producing a readily dispersible, non-foaming, low-calorie bulked sweetener composition comprising a co-dried edible bulking agent, and a low-calorie sweetening composition which contains an effective amount of a defoaming agent so as to retard foaming and a sweetening agent selected from the group consisting of saccharin, cyclamates, and L-aspartic acid derivatives, and combinations thereof, comprising the steps of (a) forming a first sweetening solution of a minor amount of an edible bulking agent, and an amount of defoaming agent greater than or equal to the effective amount to retard foam basis the total bulk sweetening composition, and a sweetener selected from the group consisting of saccharin, cyclamates, and L-aspartic acid derivatives and combinations thereof; (b) spray drying the first sweetener solution; (c) forming a second sweetening solution containing a major amount of the edible bulking agent, and a quantity of defoaming agent from 0 to less than effective amount to retard foaming and a sweetener selected from the group consisting of saccharin, cyclamates, and L-aspartic acid derivatives and combinations thereof; (d) spray drying the second sweetening solution; (e) blending the spray dried first and second dried sweetening solutions to derive a total bulked sweetening composition containing an effective amount of defoaming agent to retard foaming and having minimal change in density and flowability compared to bulked sweetening compositions wherein all defoaming agents, sweetening agents, and bulking agents are dried together.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
24 words
The method of claim 1 wherein all of the defoaming agent is co-spray dried with the minor amount of bulking agent and low-calorie sweetener.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
26 words
The method according to claim 1 wherein the bulking agent is corn syrup solids having a DE within the range of about 4 to about 20.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
18 words
The method of claim 3 wherein the DE is within the range of about 5 to about 10.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
15 words
The method of claim 2 wherein the low calorie sweetening compound is a dipeptide sweetener.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
14 words
The method according to claim 5 wherein the dipeptide sweetener is L-aspartly-L-phenylalanine methyl ester.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
14 words
The method according to claim 1 wherein the defoaming agent is a dimethyl polysiloxane.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
21 words
The method according to claim 1 wherein the final product is mixed with tricalcium phosphate to the extent of about 0.1%.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
19 words
The method of claim 1 wherein the final bulk density is from about 0.12 g/cc to about 0.18 g/cc.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
51 words
The method of claim 9 wherein the sweetening compound is a dipeptide sweetener present at a concentration of about 4.7% to about 3.1% based on the respective bulk density of the final product where the relative sweetness intensity of the dipeptide is considered to be 150 times the sweetness of sucrose.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
51 words
The method of claim 9 wherein the sweetening compound is a dipeptide sweetener present at a concentration of about 3.5% to about 2.3% based on the respective bulk density of the final product where the relative sweetness intensity of the dipeptide is considered to be 200 times the sweetness of sucrose.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US3753739A
Cited
US3983251A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1982-03-05 | 1982-09-04 | 1983-03-06 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 1986-03-05 | 1986-09-04 | 1987-03-06 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 1990-03-05 | 1990-09-04 | 1991-03-06 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |