US4139779A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Method of assessing a printed article
Assignee: Gretag AG
•
Filing: 1977-04-25
•
Granted: 1979-02-13
•
Expires: 1997-04-25
Abstract
Abstract A method is provided for automatically assessing a printed article, in particular a bank-note. The sample to be assessed is compared point by point with an original and differential values are thereby formed between the reflectance values obtained by photoelectrical scanning from the individual image points of the sample and the reflectance values of the image points of the original corresponding to the sample image points. The differential values of each image point are added, in the correct sign, with predetermined weighting, to the differential values of the image points adjacent thereto, and the sample is assessed as faulty if the absolute amount of the added differential values exceeds a predetermined threshold value at least in one image point.
Inventors
- 👤 Kurt Ehrat
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-10-26 20:14
CPC Classifications
G; G07; G07D; G07D7/00; G07D7/06; G07D7/12
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 22
Claim 1
Independent Claim
125 words
A method of assessing a printed product by point-wise comparison of the sample under assessment with an original, comprising: scanning said sample and said original to obtain reflectance values from each individual image point of the sample and the original; forming differential values between the reflectance values of corresponding image points of the sample and the original; adding, with the predetermined weighting, to the differential value of each image point the differential values of the image points adjacent to the respective image point to obtain added differential values for each image point; comparing said added differential values with a predetermined threshold; and, assessing the sample as faulty if the absolute amount of said added differential values exceeds said threshold at least in one image point.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
125 words
A method of assessing a printed product by point-wise comparison of the sample under assessment with an original, comprising: scanning said sample and said original to obtain reflectance values from each individual image point of the sample and the original; forming differential values between the reflectance values of corresponding image points of the sample and the original; adding, with the predetermined weighting, to the differential value of each image point the differential values of the image points adjacent to the respective image point to obtain added differential values for each image point; comparing said added differential values with a predetermined threshold; and, assessing the sample as faulty if the absolute amount of said added differential values exceeds said threshold at least in one image point.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
65 words
A method according to claim 1 comprising: forming a separate mean value for each image point from the differential values of the respective image point and predetermined image points surrounding the same; subtracting said separate mean value from the differential value of the respective image point; and obtaining said added differential values by weighted addition of the differential values reduced by said separate mean value.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
38 words
A method according to claim 2 comprising comparing said mean values with a predetermined shade threshold value and assessing the sample as faulty if the absolute amount of at least one mean value exceeds said shade threshold value.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
29 words
A method according to claim 1 wherein the weighting is selected according to the distance between the respective image point and the image points adjacent said respective image point.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
14 words
A method according to claim 4 wherein the weighting is selected to decrease linearly.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
14 words
A method according to claim 4 wherein the weighting is selected to decrease exponentially.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
26 words
A method according to claim 4 wherein the weighting is selected to be constant up to a predetermined distance, and equal to zero beyond such distance.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
14 words
A method according to claim 4 wherein the weighting is selected to be rotation-symmetrical.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
14 words
A method according to claim 4 wherein the weighting is selected to be pyramid-symmetrical.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
14 words
A method according to claim 7 wherein the weighting is selected to be block-symmetrical.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
36 words
A method according to claim 4 wherein the weighting is selected to decrease to zero in such manner as to reach the value zero at a distance of 2-10, image points from the image point concerned.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
54 words
A method according to claim 1 wherein prior to weighted addition of the differential values, a mean is formed from the differential values at the individual image points, said mean is subtracted from the individual differential values, and only the differential values reduced by the mean value in this way are added with weighting.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
34 words
A method according to claim 2 wherein the surrounding points are each selected to the situated within a surrounding zone whose area is 0.5% to 10% of the total original area of the sample.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim
23 words
A method according to claim 1 wherein the comparison of the sample and the original is carried out separately for individual primary colours.
Claim 16
Independent Claim
150 words
A method of assessing a printed product by pointwise comparison of the sample under assessment with an orignal, comprising: scanning said sample and said original to obtain reflectance values from each individual image point of the sample and the original; forming differential values between the reflectance values of corresponding image points of the sample and the original; comparing the differential values with a minimum threshold and selecting only those differential values whose absolute amounts are not less than said minimum threshold, adding, with predetermined weighting, to the selected differential value of each image point the selected differential values of the image points adjacent to the respective image point to obtain added differential values for each image point; comparing said added differential values with a predetermined threshold; and assessing the sample as faulty if the absolute amount of said added differential values exceeds said threshold at least in one image point.
Claim 17
Independent Claim
150 words
A method of assessing a printed product by pointwise comparison of the sample under assessment with an orignal, comprising: scanning said sample and said original to obtain reflectance values from each individual image point of the sample and the original; forming differential values between the reflectance values of corresponding image points of the sample and the original; comparing the differential values with a minimum threshold and selecting only those differential values whose absolute amounts are not less than said minimum threshold, adding, with predetermined weighting, to the selected differential value of each image point the selected differential values of the image points adjacent to the respective image point to obtain added differential values for each image point; comparing said added differential values with a predetermined threshold; and assessing the sample as faulty if the absolute amount of said added differential values exceeds said threshold at least in one image point.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim
32 words
A method according to claim 15 comprising comparing said sample and said original separately for individual primary colours and thereby selecting the minimum threshold value in dependence of the respective primary colour.
Claim 19
Dependent Claim
29 words
A method according to claim 15 wherein the minimum threshold value is selected to depend, for each image point, on its geometric position on the sample or the original.
Claim 20
Dependent Claim
58 words
A method according to claim 15 wherein the minimum threshold is so selected that its ratio to the maximum expected reflectance of an image point is at least approximately equal to the ratio between the area values of the smallest fault spot for detection having a high contrast to its surroundings, and the area of an image point.
Claim 21
Independent Claim
196 words
A method of assessing a printed product by point-wise comparison of the sample under assessment with an original, comprising: scanning said sample and said original to obtain reflectance values from each individual image point of the sample and the original; forming differential values between the reflectance values of corresponding image points of the sample and the original; forming a separate mean value for each image point from the differential values of the respective image point and predetermined image points surrounding the same; subtracting said separate mean value from the differential value of the respective image point to obtain reduced differential values; comparing the reduced values with a minimum threshold and selecting only those reduced values whose absolute amounts are not less than said minimum threshold; adding, with predetermined weighting, to the selected reduced differential value of each image point the selected reduced differential values of the image points adjacent to the respective image point to obtain added differential values for each image point; comparing said added differential values with a predetermined threshold; and assessing the sample as faulty if the absolute amount of said added differential values exceeds said threshold at least in one image point.
Claim 22
Independent Claim
196 words
A method of assessing a printed product by point-wise comparison of the sample under assessment with an original, comprising: scanning said sample and said original to obtain reflectance values from each individual image point of the sample and the original; forming differential values between the reflectance values of corresponding image points of the sample and the original; forming a separate mean value for each image point from the differential values of the respective image point and predetermined image points surrounding the same; subtracting said separate mean value from the differential value of the respective image point to obtain reduced differential values; comparing the reduced values with a minimum threshold and selecting only those reduced values whose absolute amounts are not less than said minimum threshold; adding, with predetermined weighting, to the selected reduced differential value of each image point the selected reduced differential values of the image points adjacent to the respective image point to obtain added differential values for each image point; comparing said added differential values with a predetermined threshold; and assessing the sample as faulty if the absolute amount of said added differential values exceeds said threshold at least in one image point.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1982-02-12 | 1982-08-14 | 1983-02-13 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 1986-02-12 | 1986-08-14 | 1987-02-13 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 1990-02-12 | 1990-08-14 | 1991-02-13 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |