← Back to Patent Explorer
US4107674A Expired / Lapsed US ⏱️ 0.0 years remaining

Collision avoidance system for aircrafts

Assignee: Toyo Tsushinki Kabushiki Jaka Toyo Communication Equipment Co
•
Filing: 1976-08-13
•
Granted: 1978-08-15
•
Expires: 1996-08-13
📄 Original PDF 🌐 Google Patents 🔄 Sync Now

Abstract

Abstract A collision avoidance system for aircraft in which one aircraft is equippedith an interrogation station having a secondary surveillance radar. Coarse distance measurement is effected either by passive or active distance measurement or by both of them. If the detected distance lies within a certain limit, the output power and/or period of the interrogation signal of the secondary surveillance radar of the subject aircraft is altered so as to effect fine distance measurement. This system can be applied without increasing interference against the existing secondary surveillance radar system by keeping the output power and period of interrogation signal in a minimum required extent. By the same reason the system can keep the interference at a small extent between proximate aircraft, each mounting this collision avoidance system.

Inventors

  • 👤 Chuhei Funatsu
  • 👤 Toshikiyo Hirata

Bibliographic Details

Application Number —
Jurisdiction US
Data Source google_patents
Last Synchronized 2026-10-23 11:36
CPC Classifications
G; G01; G01S; G01S13/00; G01S13/88; G01S13/93; G01S13/933; G01S13/74; G01S13/76; G01S13/78; G01S13/781

Claims Analysis

Total Claims: 12
Claim 1
Independent Claim 110 words
A collision avoidance system for aircraft each equipped with an ATC transponder comprising; an interrogation station mounted on one aircraft, having secondary surveillance radar function emitting an interrogation signal to be responded to by the ATC transponder of a second aircraft, coarse detection means on said one aircraft for detecting the existence of the second aircraft in proximity to said one aircraft, and output control means for altering at least one of output power and transmission period of the interrogation signal so as to effect fine detection of said second aircraft when said coarse detection means delivers a signal representing information concerning said second aircraft which exceeds a certain value.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim 110 words
A collision avoidance system for aircraft each equipped with an ATC transponder comprising; an interrogation station mounted on one aircraft, having secondary surveillance radar function emitting an interrogation signal to be responded to by the ATC transponder of a second aircraft, coarse detection means on said one aircraft for detecting the existence of the second aircraft in proximity to said one aircraft, and output control means for altering at least one of output power and transmission period of the interrogation signal so as to effect fine detection of said second aircraft when said coarse detection means delivers a signal representing information concerning said second aircraft which exceeds a certain value.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim 66 words
The collision avoidance system for aircraft as claimed in claim 1, wherein said coarse detection means deduces the distance between the aircraft by detecting the time difference between reception of a second interrogation signal sent from a ground secondary surveillance radar at said one aircraft and a response signal sent from the ATC transponder mounted on said second aircraft in response to said second interrogation signal.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim 62 words
The collision avoidance system for aircraft as claimed in claim 1, wherein said coarse detection means deduces distance between the aircraft by detecting the time difference between transmission of an interrogation signal sent from the interrogation station mounted on said one aircraft and a response signal sent from the ATC transponder mounted on said second aircraft in response to said interrogation signal.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim 52 words
The collision avoidance system for aircraft as claimed in claim 1, wherein said coarse detection means deduces the distance between the aircraft by detecting the receiving level of a response signal sent from the ATC transponder mounted on said second aircraft responding to an interrogation signal sent from a ground interrogation station.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim 42 words
The collision avoidance system for aircraft as claimed in claim 1, wherein said coarse detection means deduces the altitude difference information between the aircraft by detecting altitude information included in the response signal delivered from the ATC transponder of the second aircraft.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim 31 words
The collision avoidance system for aircraft as claimed in claim 1, wherein said coarse detection means deduces the variation of altitude difference between the aircraft by consecutively deducing altitude difference information.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim 57 words
The collision avoidance system for aircraft as claimed in claim 1, wherein the output control means for altering at least one of output power and transmission period of the interrogation signal sent from the interrogation station functions in response to detected variation of time difference between transmission of the interrogation signal and reception of the response signal.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim 46 words
The collision avoidance system for aircraft as claimed in claim 1, wherein the output control means functions in response to detection of the repetition frequency of the response signals, i.e. number of responses during a certain duration, sent from the ATC transponder on the second aircraft.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim 43 words
The collision avoidance system for aircraft as claimed in claim 1, wherein said output control means functions in response to detection of repetition frequency of interrogation signals sent from ground secondary surveillance radar, i.e. number of second interrogation signals during a certain duration.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim 34 words
Collision avoidance system as claimed in claim 5, wherein the response signal of the other aircraft is sent in response to an interrogation signal sent from the interrogation station mounted on said one aircraft.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim 34 words
Collision avoidance system as claimed in claim 6, wherein the response signal of the other aircraft is sent in response to an interrogation signal sent from the interrogation station mounted on said one aircraft.

References Cited (Backward Citations)

US3757324A Cited
US3772691A Cited
US3750168A Cited

USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows

Annuity Stage Window Opens Payment Deadline Surcharge Period Until Estimated Fee Status
3.5 Years (Year 4) 1981-08-14 1982-02-13 1982-08-15 $2000.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
7.5 Years (Year 8) 1985-08-14 1986-02-13 1986-08-15 $3760.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
11.5 Years (Year 12) 1989-08-14 1990-02-13 1990-08-15 $7700.00 Window Closed / Lapsed

Assigned Categories & Tags

No categories assigned to this patent yet.

Assign Category Tag