US4083238A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
System for testing proximity fuzes
Assignee: United States Department of the Navy
•
Filing: 1976-09-17
•
Granted: 1978-04-11
•
Expires: 1996-09-17
Abstract
Abstract A system for testing the performance and vulnerability of proximity fuzes der simulated live hardware conditions. The performance of the system is evaluated by the application of a repeater jammer signal within the cutoff range of the proximity fuze which is mounted in a free space test site. Beyond the cutoff range, the vulnerability of the proximity fuze is tested by the application of an unlimited number of modulated interference jamming signals which simulate approach and intercept of interference jamming sources.
Inventors
- 👤 John O. Dick
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-11-02 21:43
CPC Classifications
G; G01; G01S; G01S7/00; G01S7/02; G01S7/40
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 14
Claim 1
Independent Claim
140 words
An improved system for testing the performance of a proximity fuze having a predetermined cutoff range in response to an interference jamming signal comprising: a. means for generating an interference jamming signal; b. means for generating a predetermined envelope signal; c. means for attenuating said interference jamming signal in response to said envelope signal to simulate approach and intercept of said proximity fuze with an interference jamming source; d. means for mounting said proximity fuze at a test site of said system such that an antenna beam pattern of said proximity fuze forms a narrow cone in free space at said test site; e. horn attenna means mounted beyond said predetermined cutoff range for radiating said interference jamming signal in said narrow cone antenna beam pattern to test false activation of said proximity fuze in response to interference jamming signals.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim
140 words
An improved system for testing the performance of a proximity fuze having a predetermined cutoff range in response to an interference jamming signal comprising: a. means for generating an interference jamming signal; b. means for generating a predetermined envelope signal; c. means for attenuating said interference jamming signal in response to said envelope signal to simulate approach and intercept of said proximity fuze with an interference jamming source; d. means for mounting said proximity fuze at a test site of said system such that an antenna beam pattern of said proximity fuze forms a narrow cone in free space at said test site; e. horn attenna means mounted beyond said predetermined cutoff range for radiating said interference jamming signal in said narrow cone antenna beam pattern to test false activation of said proximity fuze in response to interference jamming signals.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
30 words
The system of claim 1 further comprising time correlation synchronizer means for activating said means for generating said interference jamming signal to produce a series of delayed interference jamming signals.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
201 words
An improved system for testing the performance of a proximity fuze having a predetermined lethal range in response to an interference jamming signal comprising: a. means for generating an interference jamming signal; b. means for generating various backscatter signals which simulate approach and intercept of said proximity fuze to a target backscatter source; c. means for generating a predetermined envelope signal; d. means for attenuating said interference jamming signal in response to said envelope signal to simulate approach and intercept of said proximity fuze with an interference jamming source; e. means for mounting said proximity fuze at a test site of said system such that an antenna beam pattern of said proximity fuze forms a narrow cone in free space at said test site; f. first horn antenna means mounted beyond said predetermined lethal range for radiating said interference jamming signal in said narrow cone antenna beam pattern to test false activation of said proximity fuze in response to interference jamming signals; and g. second horn antenna means mounted within said predetermined lethal range for radiating said backscatter signals within said narrow cone antenna beam pattern to test false activation of said proximity fuze in response to said various backscatter signals.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
201 words
An improved system for testing the performance of a proximity fuze having a predetermined lethal range in response to an interference jamming signal comprising: a. means for generating an interference jamming signal; b. means for generating various backscatter signals which simulate approach and intercept of said proximity fuze to a target backscatter source; c. means for generating a predetermined envelope signal; d. means for attenuating said interference jamming signal in response to said envelope signal to simulate approach and intercept of said proximity fuze with an interference jamming source; e. means for mounting said proximity fuze at a test site of said system such that an antenna beam pattern of said proximity fuze forms a narrow cone in free space at said test site; f. first horn antenna means mounted beyond said predetermined lethal range for radiating said interference jamming signal in said narrow cone antenna beam pattern to test false activation of said proximity fuze in response to interference jamming signals; and g. second horn antenna means mounted within said predetermined lethal range for radiating said backscatter signals within said narrow cone antenna beam pattern to test false activation of said proximity fuze in response to said various backscatter signals.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
30 words
The system of claim 3 further comprising time correlation synchronizer means for activating said means for generating said interference jamming signal to produce a series of delayed interference jamming signals.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
110 words
An improved system for testing the response of a proximity fuze to various target signature backscatter signals comprising: a. means for generating various target signature backscatter signals which simulate approach and intercept of said proximity fuze with a backscatter source; b. means for mounting said proximity fuze at a test site so that an antenna beam of said proximity fuze forms a narrow cone in free space at said test site; c. means for radiating said target signature backscatter signals from a location in said narrow cone antenna beam pattern within a predetermined cutoff range of said proximity fuze to determine which target signature backscatter signals activate said proximity fuze.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
110 words
An improved system for testing the response of a proximity fuze to various target signature backscatter signals comprising: a. means for generating various target signature backscatter signals which simulate approach and intercept of said proximity fuze with a backscatter source; b. means for mounting said proximity fuze at a test site so that an antenna beam of said proximity fuze forms a narrow cone in free space at said test site; c. means for radiating said target signature backscatter signals from a location in said narrow cone antenna beam pattern within a predetermined cutoff range of said proximity fuze to determine which target signature backscatter signals activate said proximity fuze.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
133 words
An improved system for testing the vulnerability of a proximity fuze to various interference jamming signals comprising: a. means for generating various interference jamming signals which vary in magnitude to simulate approach and intercept of said proximity fuze with an interference source; b. means for mounting said proximity fuze at a test site so that an antenna beam of said proximity fuze forms a narrow cone in free space at said test site; c. means for radiating said interference jamming signals from a location in said narrow cone antenna beam pattern beyond a predetermined cutoff range of said proximity fuze to determine if said proximity fuze will activate in response to determine if said various interference jamming signals which are radiated from a location beyond said predetermined cutoff range of said proximity fuze.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
133 words
An improved system for testing the vulnerability of a proximity fuze to various interference jamming signals comprising: a. means for generating various interference jamming signals which vary in magnitude to simulate approach and intercept of said proximity fuze with an interference source; b. means for mounting said proximity fuze at a test site so that an antenna beam of said proximity fuze forms a narrow cone in free space at said test site; c. means for radiating said interference jamming signals from a location in said narrow cone antenna beam pattern beyond a predetermined cutoff range of said proximity fuze to determine if said proximity fuze will activate in response to determine if said various interference jamming signals which are radiated from a location beyond said predetermined cutoff range of said proximity fuze.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
64 words
The system of claim 6 wherein said means for generating various interference jamming signals comprises: a. means for generating an attenuation signal which varies in magnitude according to a predetermined envelope representative of an approach and intercept of an interference jamming source; b. means for producing an interference jamming signal; c. means for attenuating said interference jamming signal in response to said attenuation signal.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
132 words
An improved system for testing the response of a proximity fuze to various backscatter signals and interference jamming signals comprising: a. means for generating various backscatter and interference jamming signals which vary in magnitude to simulate approach and intercept of said proximity fuze with a backscatter and interference source; b. means for mounting said proximity fuze at a test site so that an antenna beam of said proximity fuze forms a narrow cone in free space at said test site; c. means for radiating said backscatter signals from a location in said narrow cone antenna beam pattern within a predetermined cutoff range of said proximity fuze and said interference jamming signals from a location in said antenna beam pattern beyond a predetermined cutoff range to test false activation of said proximity fuze.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
132 words
An improved system for testing the response of a proximity fuze to various backscatter signals and interference jamming signals comprising: a. means for generating various backscatter and interference jamming signals which vary in magnitude to simulate approach and intercept of said proximity fuze with a backscatter and interference source; b. means for mounting said proximity fuze at a test site so that an antenna beam of said proximity fuze forms a narrow cone in free space at said test site; c. means for radiating said backscatter signals from a location in said narrow cone antenna beam pattern within a predetermined cutoff range of said proximity fuze and said interference jamming signals from a location in said antenna beam pattern beyond a predetermined cutoff range to test false activation of said proximity fuze.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
64 words
The system of claim 8 wherein said means for generating various interference jamming signals comprises: a. means for generating an attenuation signal which varies in magnitude according to a predetermined envelope representative of an approach and intercept of an interference jamming source; b. means for producing an interference jamming signal; c. means for attenuating said interference jamming signal in response to said attenuation signal.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US2977590A
Cited
US3015820A
Cited
US3161878A
Cited
US3130405A
Cited
US3277476A
Cited
US3794999A
Cited
US3986394A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1981-04-10 | 1981-10-10 | 1982-04-11 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 1985-04-10 | 1985-10-10 | 1986-04-11 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 1989-04-10 | 1989-10-10 | 1990-04-11 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |