US4051478A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Notched/diagonally fed electric microstrip antenna
Assignee: United States Department of the Navy
•
Filing: 1976-11-10
•
Granted: 1977-09-27
•
Expires: 1996-11-10
Abstract
Abstract A notched/diagonally fed electric microstrip dipole antenna consisting of ahin electrically conducting, rectangular-shaped element formed on one surface of a dielectric substrate, the ground plane being on the opposite surface. The length of the element determines the resonant frequency. The feed point is in a notch located along the diagonal with respect to the antenna length and width, and the input impedance can be varied to match any source impedance by moving the feed point along the diagonal line of the antenna without affecting the radiation pattern. The antenna bandwidth increases with the width of the element and spacing between the element and ground plane. Singularly fed circular polarization is easily obtained with this antenna.
Inventors
- 👤 Cyril M. Kaloi
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-10-29 21:54
CPC Classifications
H; H01; H01Q; H01Q1/00; H01Q1/27; H01Q1/28; H01Q1/286; H01Q9/00; H01Q9/04; H01Q9/0407
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 18
Claim 1
Independent Claim
290 words
A notched/diagonally fed electric microstrip dipole antenna having low physical profile and conformal arraying capability, comprising: a. a thin ground plane conductor; b. a thin rectangular radiating element for producing a radiation pattern being spaced from said ground plane; c. said radiating element being electrically separated from said ground plane by a dielectric substrate; d. said radiating element having an optimum feed point located along a diagonal line of the element between the outer edge and the center point of said element; e. said radiating element having a notch extending into said element from the outer edge thereof along said diagonal line of the element to said optimum feed point; f. the resonant frequency of the antenna being determined primarily by the length of said radiating element; the width of said notch having a slight effect on the resonant frequency, as the notch width is increased the resonant frequency being increased slightly, and vice versa; g. the antenna input impedance being variable to match most practical impedances as said feed point is moved along said diagonal line; h. the antenna bandwidth being variable with the width of the radiating element and the spacing between said radiating element and said ground plane, said spacing between the radiating element and the ground plane having somewhat greater effect on the bandwidth than the element width; i. said radiating element being operable to oscillate in two modes of current oscillation, each of said two modes being orthogonal to the other; j. antenna polarization being linear when the radiating element length and width are equal, and the antenna polarization being circular when the phase difference between the two modes of oscillation are in quadrature due to differences between the length and width of the antenna.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim
290 words
A notched/diagonally fed electric microstrip dipole antenna having low physical profile and conformal arraying capability, comprising: a. a thin ground plane conductor; b. a thin rectangular radiating element for producing a radiation pattern being spaced from said ground plane; c. said radiating element being electrically separated from said ground plane by a dielectric substrate; d. said radiating element having an optimum feed point located along a diagonal line of the element between the outer edge and the center point of said element; e. said radiating element having a notch extending into said element from the outer edge thereof along said diagonal line of the element to said optimum feed point; f. the resonant frequency of the antenna being determined primarily by the length of said radiating element; the width of said notch having a slight effect on the resonant frequency, as the notch width is increased the resonant frequency being increased slightly, and vice versa; g. the antenna input impedance being variable to match most practical impedances as said feed point is moved along said diagonal line; h. the antenna bandwidth being variable with the width of the radiating element and the spacing between said radiating element and said ground plane, said spacing between the radiating element and the ground plane having somewhat greater effect on the bandwidth than the element width; i. said radiating element being operable to oscillate in two modes of current oscillation, each of said two modes being orthogonal to the other; j. antenna polarization being linear when the radiating element length and width are equal, and the antenna polarization being circular when the phase difference between the two modes of oscillation are in quadrature due to differences between the length and width of the antenna.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
29 words
An antenna as in claim 1 wherein the ground plane conductor extends at least one wavelength beyond each edge of said radiating element to minimize any possible backlobe radiation.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
33 words
An antenna as in claim 1 wherein said thin rectangular radiation element is in the form of a square and the polarization is linear along the diagonal on which the feed point lies.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
31 words
An antenna as in claim 1 wherein said radiating element is fed along said diagonal line at the feed point at the inner end of said notch with microstrip transmission line.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
39 words
An antenna as in claim 1 wherein said radiating element is fed from a single coaxial-to-microstrip adapter, the center pin of said adapter extending through said ground plane and dielectric substrate to the feed point of said radiating element.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
22 words
An antenna as in claim 1 wherein a plurality of said radiating elements are arrayed to provide a near isotropic radiation pattern.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
32 words
An antenna as in claim 1 wherein a plurality of said radiating elements are arrayed with interconnecting microstrip transmission lines on a single dielectric substrate and fed from a single coaxial-to-microstrip adapter.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
17 words
An antenna as in claim 1 wherein the length of said radiating element is approximately 1/2 wavelength.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
34 words
An antenna as in claim 1 wherein said antenna radiation pattern can be varied from diagonal fields to circulating fields depending upon the input impedance of each of said two modes of current oscillation.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
49 words
An antenna as in claim 1 wherein a slight change in the element length and width from being of equal dimension up to approximately 0.5% difference will result in changes in some antenna characteristics and cause the polarization to change from linear along the diagonal to near circular polarization.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
54 words
An antenna as in claim 1 wherein the radiation pattern of said antenna is operable to be circularly polarized by advancing one mode of current oscillation and retarding the other mode of current oscillation until there is a 90° phase difference, and by coupling the same amount of power into each mode of oscillation.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
55 words
An antenna as in claim 1 wherein the length of the antenna radiating element is determined using Newton's Method of successive approximation by the equation: ##EQU29## where A is the length to be determined F = the center frequency (Hz) H = the thickness of the dielectric ε = the dielectric constant of the substrate.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
231 words
An antenna as in claim 12 wherein the radiation patterns for each mode of oscillation are power patterns, |E.sub.θ | 2 and |E.sub.φ | 2 , polarization field E.sub.φ and the field normal to the polarization field E.sub.θ, and are given by the equations: ##EQU30## where U = (U2 - U3)/U5 t = (t3 - t4)/t8 u2 = p sin (A × P/2) cos (k × A × sin θ sin φ/2) U3 = k sin θ sin φ cos (A × P/2)sin(k × A × sin θ sin φ/2) U5 = (P 2 - k 2 sin 2 θ sin 2 φ) T3 = P sin (P × B/2)cos(k × B × cos θ/2) T4 = k cos θ cos (P × B/2)sin(k × B × cos θ/2) T8 = (P 2 - k 2 cos 2 θ) I m = maximum current (amps) P = 2π/λ g , k = 2π/λ λ = free space wavelength (inches) λ g = waveguide wavelength (inches) and λ g ≈ 2 × A + (4 × H/√ε) r = the range between the antenna and an arbitrary point in space (inches) Z o = characteristic impedance of the element (ohms) and Z o is given by ##EQU31## H = the thickness of the dielectric B = the width of the antenna element ε = the dielectric constant of the substrate (no units).
Claim 15
Dependent Claim
31 words
An antenna as in claim 1 wherein the minimum width of said radiating element is determined by the equivalent internal resistance of the conductor plus any loss due to the dielectric.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim
55 words
An antenna as in claim 1 wherein the input impedance, R in , is given by the equation ##EQU32## where R a = the radiation resistance 2R c = the total internal resistance Z o = characteristic impedance of the element, and Y o = distance of feed point from the center of the element.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim
104 words
An antenna as in claim 1 wherein only a slight difference exists between the element length and width from being of equal dimension and the polarization is circular; the amount said radiating element length is increased from the equal dimension is determined by the equation ##EQU33## and the amount said radiating element width is decreased from the equal dimension is determined by the equation ##EQU34## where: α A and α B are propagation constants for the antenna circuit, l A is the length of the antenna radiating element, l B is the width of the antenna radiating element, λ g is the waveguide wavelength.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim
45 words
An antenna as in claim 1 wherein each of the two modes of oscillation have the same properties and one-half of the available power is coupled to one mode of oscillation and one-half of the available power is coupled to the other mode of oscillation.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US3478362A
Cited
US3810183A
Cited
US3803623A
Cited
US3947850A
Cited
US3972050A
Cited
US3972049A
Cited
US3978488A
Cited
US3984834A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1980-09-26 | 1981-03-28 | 1981-09-27 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 1984-09-26 | 1985-03-28 | 1985-09-27 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 1988-09-26 | 1989-03-28 | 1989-09-27 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |