Belt drive and belts and pulleys therefor

Claim 2

A belt drive comprising: a flexible power transmission belt having a plurality of alternating teeth and grooves extending generally transversely thereof and a pair of toothed pulleys having a plurality of alternating teeth and grooves extending generally axially thereof which engage with the belt teeth and grooves during the operation of the drive, the dimensional relationship of said belt teeth and grooves and said pulley teeth and grooves being such that in the longitudinal extent of the belt between the pulleys the height of the belt teeth is greater than the depth of the pulley grooves while as the belt travels around the pulleys the extreme outwardly facing portions of the belt teeth which confront the pulleys come into contact with the portions of the toothed pulley disposed between the pulley teeth which define the bottom of the pulley grooves and at the same time said belt teeth are compressed to reduce their height so that the extreme radially outwardly facing portions of the pulley teeth come into contact with the portions of the belt disposed between the belt teeth which define the bottoms of the belt grooves.

Claim 3

A drive as claimed in claim 1, wherein the height of each belt tooth is a maximum of about 20% greater than the depth of each pulley groove.

Claim 4

The drive as claimed in claim 1, wherein the height of each belt tooth is from about 1 to about 15% greater than the depth of each pulley groove.

Claim 5

The drive as claimed in claim 1, wherein the height of each belt tooth is about 3 to about 7% greater than the depth of each pulley groove.

Claim 6

The drive as claimed in claim 1, wherein the circumferential dimension of the root of each belt tooth is equal to or greater than the circumferential dimension of the root of each pulley tooth as measured on the dedendum line of the teeth as the belt rotates about the pulleys.

Claim 7

The drive as claimed in claim 5, wherein the ratio of the circumferential dimension of the root of each said belt tooth to the circumferential dimension of the root of each said pulley tooth is about 2 to 1.

Claim 8

The drive as claimed in claim 1, wherein as the belt travels around the pulleys there is substantially no clearance between the flanks of said belt teeth and the flanks of said pulley teeth.

Claim 9

A positive drive system comprising the combination of a positive drive belt and a pair of toothed pulleys operating in conjunction therewith, the belt including a body of flexible polymeric material having a tensile member of high modulus essentially inextensible material embedded therein and a plurality of driving teeth of substantially uniform height formed in at least one surface thereof which extend transversely of the belt and are adapted to mesh without any significant change of pitch with teeth of the toothed pulleys, the tensile member disposed substantially on the dedendum line of the driving teeth thereof, each said toothed pulley including a plurality of teeth with each tooth having a height which is less than the height of each belt driving tooth in the longitudinal extent of the belt between the pulleys, while as the belt travels around the pulleys the outer extremities of the addendum of the belt driving teeth frictionally engage the surfaces of the dedendum of the pulley between the pulley teeth with said belt driving teeth being compressed a limited amount to cause the radially outer extremities of the addendum of the pulley teeth to simultaneously frictionally engage the surfaces of the dedendum of the belt between the belt driving teeth.

Claim 10

A positive drive system comprising the combination of a positive drive belt and a pair of toothed pulleys operating in conjunction therewith, the belt including a body of flexible polymeric material having a tensile member of high modulus essentially inextensible material embedded therein and a plurality of driving teeth of substantially uniform height formed in at least one surface thereof which extend transversely of the belt and are adapted to mesh without any significant change of pitch with teeth of the toothed pulleys, the tensile member disposed substantially on the dedendum line of the driving teeth thereof, each said toothed pulley including a plurality of teeth with each tooth having a height which is less than the height of each belt driving tooth in the longitudinal extent of the belt between the pulleys, while as the belt travels around the pulleys the outer extremities of the addendum of the belt driving teeth frictionally engage the surfaces of the dedendum of the pulley between the pulley teeth with said belt driving teeth being compressed a limited amount to cause the radially outer extremities of the addendum of the pulley teeth to simultaneously frictionally engage the surfaces of the dedendum of the belt between the belt driving teeth.

Claim 11

The system as claimed in claim 8, wherein said belt driving teeth provide support for said tensile member and said tensile member assumes a substantially arcuate, non-chordal configuration as it travels around the pulleys.

Claim 12

The system as claimed in claim 8, wherein as the belt travels around the pulleys there is substantially no clearance between the flanks of said belt teeth and the flanks of said pulley teeth.

Claim 13

The system as claimed in claim 8, wherein the height of each tooth of the pulley is from about 1 to about 15% less than the height of each driving tooth of the belt in engagement therewith.

Claim 14

The system as claimed in claim 8, wherein the height of each tooth of the pulley is from about 3 to about 7% less than the height of each driving tooth of the belt in engagement therewith.

Claim 15

The system as claimed in claim 8, wherein the height of each tooth of the pulley is about 5% less than the height of each driving tooth of the belt in engagement therewith.

Claim 16

The system as claimed in claim 8, wherein said belt teeth have a rectilinear cross-sectional configuration.

Claim 17

The system as claimed in claim 8, wherein said belt teeth have a curvilinear cross-sectional configuration.

Claim 18

The system as claimed in claim 8, wherein a portion of the cross-sectional configuration of each said belt tooth is rectilinear and a portion thereof is curvilinear.

Claim 19

The system as claimed in claim 8, wherein as the belt travels around the pulleys the circumferential dimensions of each belt driving tooth as measured on its dedendum line is equal to or greater than the circumferential dimension of each pulley tooth as measured on its dedendum line.

Claim 20

The system as claimed in claim 17, wherein said circumferential dimension of each belt driving tooth is about twice as great as said circumferential dimension of each pulley tooth.

Claim 21

A flexible power transmission belt adapted for use with a pair of pulleys in a belt drive with said pulleys having a plurality of alternating teeth and grooves extending generally axially thereof, said belt comprising a plurality of alternating teeth and grooves extending generally transversely thereof which are intended to engage the teeth and grooves of the pulleys during the operation of the drive, said belt being adapted for a compressive engagement with the pulleys in that the height of said belt teeth in the longitudinal extent of the belt between the pulleys is greater than the depth of the grooves of the pulley while as the belt travels around the pulleys the extreme outwardly facing portions of the belt teeth which confront the pulley come into contact with the portions of the pulley disposed between the pulley teeth which define the bottom of the pulley grooves and at the same time said belt teeth are compressed to reduce their height so that the extreme radially outwardly facing portions of the pulley teeth come into contact with the portions of the belt disposed between the belt teeth which define the bottoms of the belt grooves.

Claim 22

A flexible power transmission belt adapted for use with a pair of pulleys in a belt drive with said pulleys having a plurality of alternating teeth and grooves extending generally axially thereof, said belt comprising a plurality of alternating teeth and grooves extending generally transversely thereof which are intended to engage the teeth and grooves of the pulleys during the operation of the drive, said belt being adapted for a compressive engagement with the pulleys in that the height of said belt teeth in the longitudinal extent of the belt between the pulleys is greater than the depth of the grooves of the pulley while as the belt travels around the pulleys the extreme outwardly facing portions of the belt teeth which confront the pulley come into contact with the portions of the pulley disposed between the pulley teeth which define the bottom of the pulley grooves and at the same time said belt teeth are compressed to reduce their height so that the extreme radially outwardly facing portions of the pulley teeth come into contact with the portions of the belt disposed between the belt teeth which define the bottoms of the belt grooves.

Claim 23

The belt as claimed in claim 19, wherein the height of each tooth of the belt is a maximum of about 20% greater than the depth of each groove of the pulley.

Claim 24

The belt as claimed in claim 19, wherein the height of each tooth of the belt is from about 1 to about 15% greater than the depth of each groove of the pulley.

Claim 25

The belt as claimed in claim 19, wherein the height of each tooth of the belt is from 3 to about 7% greater than the depth of each groove of the pulley.

Claim 26

The belt as claimed in claim 19, wherein in said longitudinal extent of the belt the width of each tooth of the belt at its base as measured substantially on the dedendum line of the belt teeth is equal to or greater than the distance between any two said teeth as measured on the dedendum line of the belt teeth.

Claim 27

The belt as claimed in claim 23, wherein said width of each said belt tooth is from about 11/2 to about 2 times greater than said distance between any two said teeth.

Claim 28

The belt as claimed in claim 19, wherein said teeth have a rectilinear cross-sectional configuration.

Claim 29

The belt as claimed in claim 19, wherein said teeth have a curvilinear cross-sectional configuration.

Claim 30

The belt as claimed in claim 19, wherein a portion of the cross-sectional configuration of each tooth is rectilinear and a portion thereof is curvilinear.

Claim 31

The belt as claimed in claim 19 for operating in a positive drive system in conjunction with a pair of toothed pulleys, said belt including a body of flexible polymeric material having a plurality of driving teeth of substantially uniform height connected thereto in at least one surface thereof that are adapted to mesh substantially without change of pitch with the teeth of the toothed pulley and a tensile member of high modulus essentially inextensible material embedded therein and disposed substantially on the dedendum line of the teeth, said driving teeth having a height which is a maximum of 20% greater than the height of the teeth of the pulleys.

Claim 32

The belt as claimed in claim 28, wherein said belt driving teeth provide support for said tensile member and said tensile member assumes a substantially arcuate, non-chordal configuration as it travels around the pulleys.

Claim 33

The belt as claimed in claim 28, wherein said belt driving teeth include a facing layer of textile fabric material.

Claim 34

At least one pulley adapted for use with a flexible power transmission belt in a belt drive including at least two pulleys around which the belt is trained with the belt including a plurality of alternating teeth and grooves extending generally transversely thereof, said pulley comprising: a plurality of alternating teeth and grooves extending generally axially thereof which are intended to engage the teeth and grooves of the belt during the operation of the drive, said pulley being adapted for a compressive engagement with the belt in that the depth of the pulley grooves is less than the height of the belt teeth in the longitudinal extent of the belt between the pulleys while as the belt travels around the pulleys the extreme outwardly facing portions of the belt teeth which confront the pulley come into contact with the portions of the pulley disposed between the pulley teeth which define the bottom of the pulley grooves and at the same time said belt teeth are compressed to reduce their height so that the extreme radially outwardly facing portions of the pulley teeth come into contact with the portions of the belt disposed between the belt teeth which define the bottoms of the belt grooves.

Claim 35

At least one pulley adapted for use with a flexible power transmission belt in a belt drive including at least two pulleys around which the belt is trained with the belt including a plurality of alternating teeth and grooves extending generally transversely thereof, said pulley comprising: a plurality of alternating teeth and grooves extending generally axially thereof which are intended to engage the teeth and grooves of the belt during the operation of the drive, said pulley being adapted for a compressive engagement with the belt in that the depth of the pulley grooves is less than the height of the belt teeth in the longitudinal extent of the belt between the pulleys while as the belt travels around the pulleys the extreme outwardly facing portions of the belt teeth which confront the pulley come into contact with the portions of the pulley disposed between the pulley teeth which define the bottom of the pulley grooves and at the same time said belt teeth are compressed to reduce their height so that the extreme radially outwardly facing portions of the pulley teeth come into contact with the portions of the belt disposed between the belt teeth which define the bottoms of the belt grooves.

Claim 36

The pulley as claimed in claim 31, wherein the depth of each groove is a maximum of about 20% less than the height of each tooth of the belt.

Claim 37

The pulley as claimed in claim 31, wherein the depth of each groove is from about 1 to about 15% less than the height of each tooth of the belt.

Claim 38

The pulley as claimed in claim 31, wherein the depth of each groove is from 3 to about 7% less than the height of each tooth of the belt.

Claim 39

The pulley as claimed in claim 31 for operating in a positive drive system in conjunction with a toothed positive drive belt, wherein the circumferential dimension of the cross section of each pulley tooth as measured at the intersection of the tangents of the flanks thereof with the addendum line of the pulley teeth is equal to or less than the circumferential distance between the confronting flanks of any two adjacent said pulley teeth as measured at the intersection of the tangents of said confronting flanks with the addendum line of the pulley teeth.

Claim 40

The pulley as claimed in claim 35, wherein said circumferential dimension of each said pulley tooth is from about 1/4 to about 1/2 of the said circumferential distance between any two said pulley teeth.