US4018739A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Tar-urethane composition
Assignee: Sumitomo Chemical Co Ltd
•
Filing: 1975-08-26
•
Granted: 1977-04-19
•
Expires: 1995-08-26
Abstract
Abstract A tar-urethane composition comprising (1) an isocyanate-reactive tar obtained by reacting a tar produced as a by-product in the phenol synthesis via hydroperoxides with a formaldehyde in the presence of a basic catalyst and in the presence or absence of at least one phenol compound and (2) a polyisocyanate, which is useful as coating agents, materials for pavement, floor linings, sealing materials and the like.
Inventors
- 👤 Masahiro Okamoto
- 👤 Morio Kimura
- 👤 Teruo Shibuya
- 👤 Shinji Yamamoto
- 👤 Shinichi Hasegawa
- 👤 Yutaka Terada
- 👤 Teruho Adachi
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-11-07 09:17
CPC Classifications
C; C08; C08G; C08G18/00; C08G18/06; C08G18/28; C08G18/40; C08G18/54; C08G18/542; Y; Y10; Y10T; Y10T428/00; Y10T428/16
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 24
Claim 1
Independent Claim
106 words
A tar-urethane composition consisting essentially of (1) a non-thermosetting isocyanate-reactive tar obtained by reacting a tar produced as a by-product in the phenol synthesis via hydroperoxides with a formaldehyde in the presence of a basic catalyst selected from the group consisting of sodium hydroxide, potassium hydroxide, aqueous ammonia and amines and (2) a polyisocyanate, wherein said tar produced as a by-product in the phenol synthesis is a high boiling fraction obtained after distillation of phenols from the acid decomposition product of hydroperoxides produced in the phenol synthesis by the cumene method, the cresol synthesis by the cymene method or the resorcin and hydroquinone synthesis from diisopropylbenzene.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim
106 words
A tar-urethane composition consisting essentially of (1) a non-thermosetting isocyanate-reactive tar obtained by reacting a tar produced as a by-product in the phenol synthesis via hydroperoxides with a formaldehyde in the presence of a basic catalyst selected from the group consisting of sodium hydroxide, potassium hydroxide, aqueous ammonia and amines and (2) a polyisocyanate, wherein said tar produced as a by-product in the phenol synthesis is a high boiling fraction obtained after distillation of phenols from the acid decomposition product of hydroperoxides produced in the phenol synthesis by the cumene method, the cresol synthesis by the cymene method or the resorcin and hydroquinone synthesis from diisopropylbenzene.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
178 words
A tar-urethane composition consisting essentially of (1) a non-thermosetting isocyanate-reactive tar obtained by reacting a tar produced as a by-product in the phenol synthesis via hydroperoxides with a formaldehyde and at least one phenol compound, wherein the phenol compound is used in a proportion of from 3 to 15 parts by weight per 100 parts by weight of the by-product tar, said phenol compound being represented by the formula: ##STR5## wherein R represents an alkyl group having 1 to 8 carbon atoms, m is zero or an integer of 1 or 2, and n is an integer of 1 or 2, in the presence of a basic catalyst, selected from the group consisting of sodium hydroxide, potassium hydroxide, aqueous ammonia and amines, wherein said tar produced as a by-product in the phenol synthesis is a high boiling fraction obtained after distillation of phenols from the acid decomposition product of hydroperoxides produced in the phenol synthesis by the cumene method, the cresol synthesis by the cymene method or the resorcin and hydroquinone synthesis from diisopropylbenzene and (2) a polyisocyanate.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
178 words
A tar-urethane composition consisting essentially of (1) a non-thermosetting isocyanate-reactive tar obtained by reacting a tar produced as a by-product in the phenol synthesis via hydroperoxides with a formaldehyde and at least one phenol compound, wherein the phenol compound is used in a proportion of from 3 to 15 parts by weight per 100 parts by weight of the by-product tar, said phenol compound being represented by the formula: ##STR5## wherein R represents an alkyl group having 1 to 8 carbon atoms, m is zero or an integer of 1 or 2, and n is an integer of 1 or 2, in the presence of a basic catalyst, selected from the group consisting of sodium hydroxide, potassium hydroxide, aqueous ammonia and amines, wherein said tar produced as a by-product in the phenol synthesis is a high boiling fraction obtained after distillation of phenols from the acid decomposition product of hydroperoxides produced in the phenol synthesis by the cumene method, the cresol synthesis by the cymene method or the resorcin and hydroquinone synthesis from diisopropylbenzene and (2) a polyisocyanate.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
20 words
A tar-urethane composition according to claim 1, wherein said amine is an aliphatic or aromatic primary, secondary or tertiary amine.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
14 words
A tar-urethane composition according to claim 1, wherein said formaldehyde is paraformaldehyde or formalin.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
33 words
A tar-urethane composition according to claim 1, wherein said reaction is carried out at a temperature in the range of from 50° to 140° C for a period of 1 to 8 hours.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
52 words
A tar-urethane composition according to claim 1, wherein the polyisocyanate is at least one member selected from the group consisting of hexamethylene diisocyanate, xylylene diisocyanate, tolylene diisocyanate, 4,4'-diphenylmethane diisocyanate, an adduct of tolylene diisocyanate and trimethylolpropane and a prepolymer obtained by reacting an excess amount of the above polyisocyanate with a polyol.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
34 words
A tar-urethane composition according to claim 1, wherein the formaldehyde is used in a proportion of from 2 to 25 parts by weight as paraformaldehyde per 100 parts by weight of the by-product tar.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
38 words
A tar-urethane composition according to claim 1, wherein sodium hydroxide or potassium hydroxide is used in a proportion of from 1 to 5 parts be weight as 10N solution per 100 parts by weight of the by-product tar.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
34 words
A tar-urethane composition according to claim 1, wherein the aqueous ammonia is used in a proportion of from 5 to 10 parts by weight as 28% ammonia per 100 parts of the by-product tar.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
26 words
A tar-urethane composition according to claim 1, wherein the amine is used in a proportion of from 1 to 8 mol % based on the formaldehyde.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
31 words
A tar-urethane composition according to claim 1, wherein the polyisocyanate is used in a proportion of 0.1 to 0.5 gram equivalent as isocyanate group per 100 grams of the isocyanate-reactive tar.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
20 words
A tar-urethane composition according to claim 2, wherein said amine is an aliphatic or aromatic primary, secondary or tertiary amine.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim
14 words
A tar-urethane composition according to claim 2, wherein said formaldehyde is paraformaldehyde or formalin.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim
33 words
A tar-urethane composition according to claim 2, wherein said reaction is carried out at a temperature in the range of from 50° to 140° C for a period of 1 to 8 hours.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim
52 words
A tar-urethane composition according to claim 2, wherein the polyisocyanate is at least one member selected from the group consisting of hexamethylene diisocyanate, xylylene diisocyanate, tolylene diisocyanate, 4,4'-diphenylmethane diisocyanate, an adduct of tolylene diisocyanate and trimethylolpropane and a prepolymer obtained by reacting an excess amount of the above polyisocyanate with a polyol.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim
34 words
A tar-urethane composition according to claim 2, wherein the formaldehyde is used in a proportion of from 2 to 25 parts by weight as paraformaldehyde per 100 parts by weight of the by-product tar.
Claim 19
Dependent Claim
38 words
A tar-urethane composition according to claim 2, wherein sodium hydroxide or potassium hydroxide is used in a proportion of from 1 to 5 parts by weight as 10N solution per 100 parts by weight of the by-product tar.
Claim 20
Dependent Claim
34 words
A tar-urethane composition according to claim 2, wherein the aqueous ammonia is used in a proportion of from 5 to 10 parts by weight as 28% ammonia per 100 parts of the by-product tar.
Claim 21
Dependent Claim
26 words
A tar-urethane composition according to claim 2, wherein the amine is used in a proportion of from 1 to 8 mol % based on the formaldehyde.
Claim 22
Dependent Claim
31 words
A tar-urethane composition according to claim 2, wherein the polyisocyanate is used in a proportion of 0.1 to 0.5 gram equivalent as isocyanate group per 100 grams of the isocyanate-reactive tar.
Claim 23
Dependent Claim
132 words
A tar-urethane composition according to claim 1, wherein: said reaction is carried out at a temperature in the range of from 50° to 140° C for a period of 1 to 8 hours; the formaldehyde is used in a proportion of from 2 to 25 parts by weight as paraformaldehyde per 100 parts by weight of the by-product tar; sodium hydroxide or potassium hydroxide is used in a proportion of from 1 to 5 parts by weight as 10N solution per 100 parts by weight of the by-product tar; aqueous ammonia is used in a proportion of from 5 to 10 parts by weight as 28% ammonia per 100 parts by-product tar; and the amine is used in a proportion of from about 1 to 8 mol percent based on the formaldehyde.
Claim 24
Dependent Claim
132 words
A tar-urethane composition according to claim 2, wherein: said reaction is carried out at a temperature in the range of from 50° to 140° C for a period of 1 to 8 hours; the formaldehyde is used in a proportion of from 2 to 25 parts by weight as paraformaldehyde per 100 parts by weight of the by-product tar; sodium hydroxide or potassium hydroxide is used in a proportion of from 1 to 5 parts by weight of 10N solution per 100 parts by weight of the by-product tar; aqueous ammonia is used in a proportion of from 5 to 10 parts by weight as 28% ammonia per 100 parts of by-product tar; and the amine is used in a proportion of from 1 to 8 mol percent based on the formaldehyde.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US2608536A
Cited
US3271331A
Cited
US3409579A
Cited
FR1557726A
Cited
US3632531A
Cited
NL7009954A
Cited
US3862089A
Cited
US3835077A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1980-04-18 | 1980-10-18 | 1981-04-19 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 1984-04-18 | 1984-10-18 | 1985-04-19 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 1988-04-18 | 1988-10-18 | 1989-04-19 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |