US3987243A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Image enhancement method and apparatus
Assignee: Lockheed Martin Corp
•
Filing: 1975-11-03
•
Granted: 1976-10-19
•
Expires: 1995-11-03
Abstract
Abstract Combined optical and electronic apparatus provide for various types of image enhancement by producing two images of the same scene which differ by a predetermined property, and by electronically subtracting the images to yield a video difference signal which emphasizes or deemphasizes a predetermined characteristic of the scene at which the apparatus is pointed. Various types of image enhancement are obtained by simultaneous scanning of the images produced by two imaging systems in which a relative difference in properties between the images such as deliberate misalignment, optical density difference, image resolution, image magnification or image receptor displacement is introduced to create a particular type of enhancement. The intensities from pairs of scanned spots are subtracted on a point-by-point basis to yield a video difference signal which when displayed provides an image enhanced in a particular manner. Property differences are in general introduced in the aperture plane, at the optics or in the image plane. The subject system can be arranged for edge enhancement, size discrimination, emphasis of lines in a predetermined direction, peripheral image enhancement, and central image or boresite enhancement. This system is particularly useful in clutter rejection for TV-based target tracking systems.
Inventors
- 👤 Jacob Schwartz
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-10-25 06:47
CPC Classifications
G; G01; G01S; G01S3/00; G01S3/78; G01S3/782; G01S3/785; G01S3/786; G01S3/7864; H; H04; H04N; H04N5/00; H04N5/14; H04N7/00; H04N7/18; H04N7/183
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 21
Claim 1
Independent Claim
96 words
A method of enhancing predetermined characteristics of an image of an object comprising the steps of: forming two representations of the object, with one of said representations having a point spread function different from the other of said representations; reading out the intensity of the representations at corresponding points so as to form two electrical signals, having values a and b respectively; combining said signals in accordance with f.sup. -1 {f(a) - f(b)} where f is a monotonic function to produce a composite signal; and displaying said composite signal in a manner corresponding to the readout.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
96 words
A method of enhancing predetermined characteristics of an image of an object comprising the steps of: forming two representations of the object, with one of said representations having a point spread function different from the other of said representations; reading out the intensity of the representations at corresponding points so as to form two electrical signals, having values a and b respectively; combining said signals in accordance with f.sup. -1 {f(a) - f(b)} where f is a monotonic function to produce a composite signal; and displaying said composite signal in a manner corresponding to the readout.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
27 words
The method of claim 1 wherein said forming step includes an optical system having a predetermined aperture, a lens system and receptors for detecting respectively said representations.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
16 words
The method of claim 2 wherein said point spread function difference is a function of apodization.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
18 words
The method of claim 2 wherein said point spread function difference is a function of lens system parameters.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
23 words
The method of claim 2 wherein said point spread function difference is a function of receptor positioning with respect to said lens system.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
20 words
The method of claim 2 wherein said readout step includes a synchronized twin scan of the receptors at corresponding points.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
25 words
The method of claim 6 wherein said twin scan is parallel in which points at the same locations on the receptors are simultaneously read out.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
44 words
The method of claim 6 wherein a point at a first location on one receptor is simultaneously read out with a location adjacent to this first location on the other receptor, whereby enhancement of lines parallel to the direction of the adjacency are deemphasized.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
37 words
The method of claim 7 wherein one of said receptors is at the focal plane of said lens system and wherein the other of said receptors is removed from said focal plane, whereby edge enhancement is achieved.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
46 words
The method of claim 7 wherein said lens system includes two optical lens subsystems having skewed optical axis, and wherein each receptor lies in the focal plane of one of said two optical lens subsystems, whereby lines parallel to the direction of axis skew are deemphasized.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
39 words
The method of claim 7 wherein said lens system includes two optical subsystems having different magnifications and wherein said receptors are located respectively at the focal planes of said lens subsystems whereby circumferential line peripheral image enhancement is achieved.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
36 words
The method of claim 6 wherein said receptors are rotated and wherein said twin scan is likewise rotated so that corresponding locations on the receptors are simultaneously scanned, whereby radial line peripheral image enhancement is achieved.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
29 words
The method of claim 7 wherein said lens system includes lens subsystems with parallel optical axes and rotationally offset receptors, whereby radial and circumferential line peripheral enhancement is achieved.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim
33 words
The method of claim 7 wherein said lens system includes two lens subsystems and wherein an element that modifies field curvature is located at the focal plane of one of the lens subsystems.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim
31 words
The method of claim 14 wherein image surface coincidence for the two lens subsystems is at the periphery of the image surfaces when superimposed whereby orientation independent boresite enhancement is achieved.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim
32 words
The method of claim 14 wherein image surface coincidence for the two lens subsystems is at the center of the image surfaces when superimposed whereby orientation independent peripheral image enhancement is achieved.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim
30 words
The method of claim 7 wherein said lens system includes two lens subsystems and wherein an inhomogenous filter is located near the aperture plane of one of the lens subsystems.
Claim 19
Dependent Claim
17 words
The method of claim 7 wherein said lens system includes two lens subsystems having differing aperture parameters.
Claim 20
Dependent Claim
15 words
The method of claim 18 wherein said aperture parameters includes the shape of the apertures.
Claim 21
Dependent Claim
15 words
The method of claim 18 wherein said aperture parameters includes the size of the apertures.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1979-10-19 | 1980-04-19 | 1980-10-19 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 1983-10-19 | 1984-04-19 | 1984-10-19 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 1987-10-19 | 1988-04-19 | 1988-10-19 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |