US3978476A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Circuit conduction test arrangement for emergency alarm systems
Assignee: Hochiki Corp
•
Filing: 1974-12-13
•
Granted: 1976-08-31
•
Expires: 1994-12-13
Abstract
Abstract Circuit conduction test arrangement for emergency alarm systems having a receiving panel for a group of several sections to be supervised and including common alarm means, and a plurality of relay panels installed in the respective sections; comprising in each relay panel a sensor and an alarm device connected in parallel, said relay panels including a test switch, a reset switch and an impedance network; the receiving panel including means responsive to the variation of the input impedance, having first and second responsive devices connected in a particular manner so as to provide safe operation for the circuit conduction tests. In the test operation, the common alarm means does not operate, and only the alarm device of the relaying panel operates which has its text switch activated.
Inventors
- 👤 Takeshi Tanigawa
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-10-30 18:16
CPC Classifications
G; G08; G08B; G08B29/00; G08B29/12; G08B29/14; G08B25/00; G08B25/14; G08B29/123; G08B29/126
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 11
Claim 1
Independent Claim
282 words
A circuit conduction test arrangement for emergency alarm systems of the type having a receiving panel provided for a group of a plurality of sections to be supervised and including common alarm means, and a plurality of relay panels connected across a pair of conductors extending from said receiving panel, installed in the respective sections to be supervised; comprising in each of said relay panels a sensor and an alarm device connected in parallel across said conductors, said relay panels including a test switch, a reset switch and an impedance network for the circuit conduction test; said test switch being connected to vary the circuit connection of said relay panels such that, at the time of the test, said network is connected across said conductors to vary the input impedance of said relay panels from the value shown at the time when the respective said sensor is operated, and after that said network is disconnected to vary the input impedance to the same value as shown when said respective sensor is in operation; said receiving panel including means responsive to the variation of the input impedance, said responsive means having a first responsive device which operates while said respective sensor is in operation and which supplies power to said common alarm means, and a second responsive device which starts operating when said test switch is activated and said network is connected across said conductors; wherein said responsive devices are connected such that, when said second responsive device starts operating first, said first responsive device does not operate even if the input impedance achieves a value equal to that shown when said respective sensor is in operation after said network has been disconnected.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim
282 words
A circuit conduction test arrangement for emergency alarm systems of the type having a receiving panel provided for a group of a plurality of sections to be supervised and including common alarm means, and a plurality of relay panels connected across a pair of conductors extending from said receiving panel, installed in the respective sections to be supervised; comprising in each of said relay panels a sensor and an alarm device connected in parallel across said conductors, said relay panels including a test switch, a reset switch and an impedance network for the circuit conduction test; said test switch being connected to vary the circuit connection of said relay panels such that, at the time of the test, said network is connected across said conductors to vary the input impedance of said relay panels from the value shown at the time when the respective said sensor is operated, and after that said network is disconnected to vary the input impedance to the same value as shown when said respective sensor is in operation; said receiving panel including means responsive to the variation of the input impedance, said responsive means having a first responsive device which operates while said respective sensor is in operation and which supplies power to said common alarm means, and a second responsive device which starts operating when said test switch is activated and said network is connected across said conductors; wherein said responsive devices are connected such that, when said second responsive device starts operating first, said first responsive device does not operate even if the input impedance achieves a value equal to that shown when said respective sensor is in operation after said network has been disconnected.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
122 words
The test arrangement as defined in claim 1, wherein said relay panels further include first delay means which start operating after a first predetermined interval from the time when said test switch has been operated and said network has been connected across said conductors, thus to disconnect said network from said conductors and vary the input impedance to a value shown at the time when said respective sensor has been operated, and wherein said receiving panel further includes second delay means which allows said second responsive device to operate after a second predetermined interval from the time when said test switch has been operated and said network has been connected across said conductors, the first interval being longer than the second interval.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
62 words
The test arrangement as defined in claim 1, wherein said first responsive device further includes a first relay for controlling the energization of said common alarm means, wherein each said relay panel further includes a second relay for operating said alarm device in each said relay panel, and said test switch is connected to selectively interrupt the connection to said first relay.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
39 words
The test arrangement as defined in claim 3, wherein said first responsive device further includes a diode connected in series with said conductors, and means for operating said first relay in response to a voltage drop across said diode.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
128 words
The test arrangement as defined in claim 4, wherein said receiving panel further includes a first impedance device connected in series with one of said conductors and having a value adapted to restrict the current flowing through said conductors, so as to prevent the operation of said second relay, a third relay for shorting said first impedance device, means for operating said third relay in response to a voltage drop across said diode and means for delaying the operation of said third relay, whereby when said sensor of one of the sections transmits an alarm signal to said receiving panel, said first relay is firstly operated to energize said common alarm means, and said second relay is then operated to energize said alarm device of the respective section.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
46 words
The test arrangement as defined in claim 3, wherein said alarm device in each said relay panel is controlled by a transistor which is controlled by said test switch through a time delay circuit when said test switch is switched for performing the circuit conduction test.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
53 words
The test arrangement as defined in claim 1, wherein each said relay panel further includes a terminal diode connected in parallel opposition with said respective sensor, and said test switch is connected such that it changes the polarity of the connection of said terminal diode and said sensor with respect to said conductors.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
154 words
The test arrangement as defined in claim 1, wherein said receiving panel is provided with a source of supply for energizing said conductors, said first responsive device further includes a diode connected in series with said conductors, a third relay responsive to a voltage drop across said diode, for directly connecting said conductors to said source, a first relay connected in series with said conductors, said first relay having a normally open contact connected between said source and said common alarm means, and wherein each said relay panel is provided with a second relay energized by an alarm signal transmitted by said sensor, said first relay having a lower operating voltage than said second and said third relays so that when said sensor transmits the alarm signal to said receiving panel, said first relay operates first to energize said common alarm means, and then said second relay is operated to energize said alarm device.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
53 words
The test arrangement as defined in claim 8, wherein said test switch includes first and second contacts for changing the polarity of the voltage impressed across said sensor, and a third switch connected between said second relay and said first contact for connecting a second impedance network in series with said second relay.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
28 words
The test arrangement as defined in claim 8, wherein said third relay is connected to respond to the voltage drop across said diode through a time delay circuit.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1979-08-31 | 1980-03-01 | 1980-08-31 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 1983-08-31 | 1984-03-01 | 1984-08-31 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 1987-08-31 | 1988-03-01 | 1988-08-31 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |