US3950642A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Method of inspecting shot peened surfaces for extent of coverage
Assignee: Metal Improvement Co LLC
•
Filing: 1975-05-27
•
Granted: 1976-04-13
•
Expires: 1995-05-27
Abstract
Abstract The method of inspecting shot peened surfaces of a workpiece for the extent of coverage comprises coating the surface to be peened of a workpiece with a material containing a fluorescent dye and then shot peening the part to be peened until the amount of fluorescent coating remaining, as indicated by the amount of fluorescent radiation given off when exposed to ultraviolet light, compares with the amount of fluorescent radiation given off from a previously prepared control specimen which has the same material characteristics as the workpiece and was coated with the same fluorescent material and shot peened to a desired coverage.
Inventors
- 👤 Paul G. Feld
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-11-05 18:03
CPC Classifications
C; C21; C21D; C21D7/00; C21D7/02; C21D7/04; C21D7/06; G; G01; G01N; G01N21/00; G01N21/84; G01N21/88; G01N21/8803
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 12
Claim 1
Independent Claim
147 words
The method of inspecting shot peened surfaces of a workpiece to determine the extent of shot peening coverage comprising the steps of: a. providing a control specimen composed of like material as the part to be shot peened with a coating of identifiable material; b. shot peening the control specimen until a predetermined peening coverage has been obtained as indicated by the change in the appearance of the coating on the peened surface; c. shot peening the surface of the workpiece to be peened which surface has been coated with the same identifiable material as the control specimen; and d. comparing the appearance of the shot peened surface of the workpiece with the appearance of the control specimen so that when the compared surfaces are the same in appearance, the shot peened surface of the workpiece is known to have been subjected to said predetermined peening coverage.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
147 words
The method of inspecting shot peened surfaces of a workpiece to determine the extent of shot peening coverage comprising the steps of: a. providing a control specimen composed of like material as the part to be shot peened with a coating of identifiable material; b. shot peening the control specimen until a predetermined peening coverage has been obtained as indicated by the change in the appearance of the coating on the peened surface; c. shot peening the surface of the workpiece to be peened which surface has been coated with the same identifiable material as the control specimen; and d. comparing the appearance of the shot peened surface of the workpiece with the appearance of the control specimen so that when the compared surfaces are the same in appearance, the shot peened surface of the workpiece is known to have been subjected to said predetermined peening coverage.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
32 words
The method of claim 1 wherein the workpiece to be peened before shot peening is inspected to insure that the entire surface to be peened has been coated with said identifiable material.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
15 words
The method of claim 1 wherein said identifiable material is a liquid containing a dye.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
23 words
The method of claim 1 wherein said identifiable material is a liquid containing a dye which has a luminescent property responsive to light.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
45 words
The method of claim 4 wherein said dye becomes vividly fluorescent during exposure to fluorescigenous radiant energy so that the step of comparing the control specimen shot peened surface and shot peened surface of the workpiece includes exposure of such surface to fluorescigenous radiant energy.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
24 words
The method of claim 1 wherein the shot peened surface of the control specimen is examined for the extent of peening coverage under magnification.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
10 words
The method of claim 6 wherein magnification is about ten-power.
Claim 9
Independent Claim
168 words
The method of inspecting a shot peened surface of a workpiece to determine the extent of shot peening coverage comprising the steps of: a. selecting a control specimen of a material having the same characteristics as the material of the workpiece to be peened and coating the control specimen and the surfaces of the workpiece with a material containing a fluorescent dye; b. shot peening the control specimen until the desired peening coverage has been obtained by examination of the surface under magnification and as indicated by the degree of radiation emitted by the surface when exposed to ultra-violet light; c. shot peening the surface of the workpiece to be peened; and d. comparing the appearance of the peened surfaces of the workpiece to be peened under ultra-violet light with the appearance of the control specimen under ultra-violet light and further shot peening the workpiece when necessary until the appearance of all the areas of the peened surfaces of the workpiece match the appearance of the control specimen.
Claim 10
Independent Claim
168 words
The method of inspecting a shot peened surface of a workpiece to determine the extent of shot peening coverage comprising the steps of: a. selecting a control specimen of a material having the same characteristics as the material of the workpiece to be peened and coating the control specimen and the surfaces of the workpiece with a material containing a fluorescent dye; b. shot peening the control specimen until the desired peening coverage has been obtained by examination of the surface under magnification and as indicated by the degree of radiation emitted by the surface when exposed to ultra-violet light; c. shot peening the surface of the workpiece to be peened; and d. comparing the appearance of the peened surfaces of the workpiece to be peened under ultra-violet light with the appearance of the control specimen under ultra-violet light and further shot peening the workpiece when necessary until the appearance of all the areas of the peened surfaces of the workpiece match the appearance of the control specimen.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
25 words
The method of claim 8 wherein said control specimen and workpiece to be peened are hard steels and the dye is fluorescent ink, No. 220.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
35 words
The method of claim 8 wherein the workpiece before shot peening is subjected to ultra-violet light to insure that the entire surfaces to be peened have been coated with the liquid containing the fluorescent dye.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US2920203A
Cited
US3695091A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1979-04-13 | 1979-10-13 | 1980-04-13 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 1983-04-13 | 1983-10-13 | 1984-04-13 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 1987-04-13 | 1987-10-13 | 1988-04-13 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |