US3936432A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Process of polymerization of conjugated diolefins using iron catalysts and sulfur ligands
Assignee: Goodyear Tire and Rubber Co
•
Filing: 1974-11-22
•
Granted: 1976-02-03
•
Expires: 1994-11-22
Abstract
Abstract A process of polymerizing conjugated diolefinic monomers containing from 4 to about 12 carbon atoms to high molecular weight polymers by bringing said monomers into contact with a catalyst system consisting of (1) an iron-containing compound, (2) an organometallic reducing agent from Groups I and III of the Periodic Table, and (3) a sulfur oxygen containing ligand.
Inventors
- 👤 Morford C. Throckmorton
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-11-07 18:12
CPC Classifications
C; C08; C08F; C08F36/00; C08F36/02; C08F36/04; C08F2410/00; C08F2410/01
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 14
Claim 1
Independent Claim
116 words
A process for polymerizing conjugated diolefinic monomers containing from 4 to about 12 carbon atoms by bringing said monomers into contact with a catalytically effective amount of a catalyst consisting essentially of (1) an iron containing compound, (2) an organometallic reducing agent from Groups I and III of the Periodic Table, and (3) a sulfur-containing ligand characterized in that said ligand contains at least two functional groups wherein said functional groups are a combination of (a) two thio groups which are attached to different carbon atoms, (b) a mercapto and an imino, imine or imidazole group, (c) an hydroxyl and an imino, imine or imidazole group, or (d) a thio and an amine or imino group.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim
116 words
A process for polymerizing conjugated diolefinic monomers containing from 4 to about 12 carbon atoms by bringing said monomers into contact with a catalytically effective amount of a catalyst consisting essentially of (1) an iron containing compound, (2) an organometallic reducing agent from Groups I and III of the Periodic Table, and (3) a sulfur-containing ligand characterized in that said ligand contains at least two functional groups wherein said functional groups are a combination of (a) two thio groups which are attached to different carbon atoms, (b) a mercapto and an imino, imine or imidazole group, (c) an hydroxyl and an imino, imine or imidazole group, or (d) a thio and an amine or imino group.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
31 words
A process according to claim 1 wherein the polymerization is conducted in the presence of a solvent selected from the group of pentane, hexane, toluene, benzene, cyclohexane, dichloromethane, tetrachloroethylene and monochlorobenzene.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
37 words
A process according to claim 1 in which the iron containing compound is selected from the group consisting of iron salts of carboxylic acids, organic complex compounds of iron, iron salts of inorganic acids and iron carbonyls.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
55 words
A process according to claim 1 in which the iron containing compound is selected from the group consisting of ferric oxalate, ferric hexanoate, ferric octanoate, ferric decanoate, ferric stearate, ferric naphthenate, ferrous acetylacetonate, ferric acetylacetonate, ferric-1ethoxy 1,3-butanedionate, ferrous dimethyl glyoxime, ferric chloride ferrous chloride, ferric bromide, ferric phosphate, iron tetracarbonyl, iron pentacarbonyl and iron nonacarbonyl.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
28 words
A process according to claim 1 in which the iron containing compound is selected from the group consisting of iron octanoate, iron decanoate, iron naphthenate and ferric acetylacetonate.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
24 words
A process according to claim 1 wherein the sulfur containing ligand is selected from the group consisting of 2-mercaptobenzimidazole, dithiooxamide, N,N' -dimethyldithiooxamide and N,N'-didodecyldithiooxamide.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
24 words
A process according to claim 1 in which the organometallic compound is selected from the group consisting of a trialkylaluminum and a dialkylaluminum hydride.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
47 words
A process according to claim 1 in which the molar ratio of the organometallic compound to the iron compound (Al/Fe) is from about 1/1 to about 400/1 and the molar ratio of the sulfur ligand to the iron compound (S/Fe) is from about 0.1/1 to about 100/1.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
47 words
A process according to claim 1 in which the molar ratio of the organometallic compound to the iron compound (Al/Fe) is from about 1/1 to about 12/1 and the molar ratio of the sulfur ligand to the iron compound (S/Fe) is from about 0.1/1 to about 3/1.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
32 words
A process according to claim 1 wherein the ratio of the monomer to the iron compound is from about 100/1 to about 18,000/1 and more preferably from about 600/1 to about 3700/1.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
24 words
A process according to claim 1 wherein the conjugated diolefinic monomer is butadiene and wherein the polymer produced is at least 70 percent trans-1,4-polybutadiene.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
27 words
A process according to claim 1 wherein the conjugated diolefin is 2,3-dimethyl-1,3-butadiene and wherein the polymer produced is a stereoregular polydimethylbutadiene containing at least 80 percent cis-1,4-structure.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
94 words
A process according to claim 1 wherein the iron-containing compound is selected from the group consisting of iron octanoate, iron decanoate, iron naphthenate, ferric acetylacetonate; the organometallic compound is selected from the group consisting of trialkyl aluminums and dialkylaluminum hydrides; the sulfur containing ligand is selected from the group consisting of 2-mercaptobenzimidazole, dithiooxamide and N,N-dimethyl dithiooxamide, and the molar ratio of the organometallic compound to the iron compound is from about 1/1 to about 12/1 and the molar ratio of the sulfur ligand to the iron compound is from about 0.1/1 to about 3/1.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US3565875A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1979-02-02 | 1979-08-04 | 1980-02-03 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 1983-02-02 | 1983-08-04 | 1984-02-03 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 1987-02-02 | 1987-08-04 | 1988-02-03 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |