US3934221A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Terrain closure warning system with altitude rate signal conditioning
Assignee: Sundstrand Corp
•
Filing: 1975-03-06
•
Granted: 1976-01-20
•
Expires: 1995-03-06
Abstract
Abstract In an aircraft terrain warning system utilizing a radar altimeter wherein the rate of closure to the terrain is compared with the aircraft's altitude above the terrain to generate a warning signal when the closure rate is excessive for a particular altitude, the closure rate signal is limited and biased depending upon the aircraft's closure rate and configuration in order to significantly increase the time response of the system while at the same time reducing nuisance warnings. The amplitude limit on the closure rate signal, is varied, above a predefined altitude, as a function of the closure rate signal in oreder to provide increased warning times at greater closure rates. Circuitry, responsive to the aircraft's flap positions, is also provided to alter the characteristics of rate limiter so as to provide warning parameters that more accurately reflect operating conditions at lower aircraft speeds.
Inventors
- 👤 Charles Donald Bateman
- 👤 Hans Rudolf Muller
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-10-25 16:38
CPC Classifications
G; G01; G01C; G01C5/00; G01C5/005; B; B64; B64D; B64D45/00; B64D45/04; G01C21/00; G08; G08G; G08G5/00; G08G5/20; G08G5/21; G08G5/70; G08G5/74; G08G5/80
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 21
Claim 1
Independent Claim
116 words
In a terrain warning system for aircraft utilizing the comparison of an altitude above ground signal received from a radar altimeter with an altitude rate signal derived from the altitude above ground signal to generate a warning signal indicating excessive terrain closure rates, wherein the improvement comprises: means for conditioning the altitude rate signal indicating a decrease in altitude; and means operatively connected to said conditioning means for limiting the altitude rate signal indicating an increase in altitude, in relation to the altitude rate signal indicating a decrease in altitude in order to increase the time response of the terrain warning system by decreasing the effects of the altitude rate signal indicating an increase in altitude.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim
116 words
In a terrain warning system for aircraft utilizing the comparison of an altitude above ground signal received from a radar altimeter with an altitude rate signal derived from the altitude above ground signal to generate a warning signal indicating excessive terrain closure rates, wherein the improvement comprises: means for conditioning the altitude rate signal indicating a decrease in altitude; and means operatively connected to said conditioning means for limiting the altitude rate signal indicating an increase in altitude, in relation to the altitude rate signal indicating a decrease in altitude in order to increase the time response of the terrain warning system by decreasing the effects of the altitude rate signal indicating an increase in altitude.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
56 words
The system of claim 1 wherein said conditioning means limits the maximum permitted value of the altitude rate signal indicating a decrease in altitude and wherein said limit means is effective to reduce the maximum permitted value of the altitude rate signal below said limit imposed on the altitude rate signal representing a decrease in altitude.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
28 words
The system of claim 2 wherein said conditioning means includes a signal limiting circuit and said limit means includes a circuit for causing said circuit to operate asymmetrically.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
40 words
The system of claim 2 wherein said asymmetric signal limiting circuit comprises: a signal amplitude limiting circuit a circuit operatively connected to said amplitude limiting circuit for varying the amplitude limit of the altitude rate signal depending upon its polarity.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
40 words
The system of claim 4 wherein said asymmetric signal limiting circuit additionally includes a circuit responsive to a flap signal for selectively causing the limit placed on the altitude rate signal to be substantially symmetric with respect to signal polarity.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
54 words
The system of claim 2 additionally including means, responsive to the flight configuration of the aircraft cooperating with said conditioning means, and said limit means for establishing essentially equal limits on the maximum permitted value of the altitude rate signals indicating an increase in altitude and altitude rate signals indicating a decrease in altitude.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
22 words
The system of claim 6 wherein said conditioning means and said limit means are responsive to the flap settings of the aircraft.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
79 words
A limit circuit for limiting the amplitude of signals representing the rate of change in radar altitude in a terrain warning system comprising: an amplifier responsive to the radar rate signal; a bridge rectifier operatively connected to said amplifier; a first feedback circuit connected between said bridge rectifier and said amplifier; and a bias circuit operatively connected to said bridge rectifier for decreasing the amplitude limit of the radar rate signal having a polarity indicating an increase in altitude.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
79 words
A limit circuit for limiting the amplitude of signals representing the rate of change in radar altitude in a terrain warning system comprising: an amplifier responsive to the radar rate signal; a bridge rectifier operatively connected to said amplifier; a first feedback circuit connected between said bridge rectifier and said amplifier; and a bias circuit operatively connected to said bridge rectifier for decreasing the amplitude limit of the radar rate signal having a polarity indicating an increase in altitude.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
46 words
The circuit of claim 8 additionally including a circuit operatively connected to said bias circuit and responsive to a signal representing the flap configuration of the aircraft for causing said biasing circuit to apply substantially equal amplitude limits on the radar rate signals of either polarity.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
84 words
A terrain warning system utilizing an altitude above ground signal and a rate of change in altitude signal for generating a warning signal indicating excessive terrain closure comprising: biasing means for biasing the altitude rate signal; limiting means for limiting said biased altitude rate signal; scaling means operatively connected to said biasing means and said limit means for removing said bias from the altitude rate signal; comparator means responsive to said scaled altitude rate signal and the altitude signal for generating the warning signal.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
84 words
A terrain warning system utilizing an altitude above ground signal and a rate of change in altitude signal for generating a warning signal indicating excessive terrain closure comprising: biasing means for biasing the altitude rate signal; limiting means for limiting said biased altitude rate signal; scaling means operatively connected to said biasing means and said limit means for removing said bias from the altitude rate signal; comparator means responsive to said scaled altitude rate signal and the altitude signal for generating the warning signal.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
27 words
The warning system of claim 10 additionally including filter means operatively connected between said limit means and said scaling means for filtering said limited altitude rate signal.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim
33 words
The system of claim 11 additionally including switch means responsive to a signal representing the aircraft's configuration and operatively connected to said biasing means for altering the bias on said altitude rate signal.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim
29 words
The system of claim 12 wherein said limit means includes means for altering the maximum limit on said biased altitude rate signal in response to said aircraft configuration signal.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim
21 words
The system of claim 13 including means responsive to a terrain clearance signal for preventing the generation of the warning signal.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim
103 words
In a terrain warning system having means for comparing radio altimeter signals and altitude rate of change signals derived from said radio altimeter signals for generating a warning signal and having a limit means for limiting the value of the altitude rate signal, wherein the improvement comprises: means for biasing the altitude rate signal prior to being inputted into said limit means thereby eliminating delays in the generation of the warning signal due to altitude rate signals indicating an increase in altitude; and means for removing said bias from the limited altitude rate signal prior to its being input to the comparing means.
Claim 19
Dependent Claim
103 words
In a terrain warning system having means for comparing radio altimeter signals and altitude rate of change signals derived from said radio altimeter signals for generating a warning signal and having a limit means for limiting the value of the altitude rate signal, wherein the improvement comprises: means for biasing the altitude rate signal prior to being inputted into said limit means thereby eliminating delays in the generation of the warning signal due to altitude rate signals indicating an increase in altitude; and means for removing said bias from the limited altitude rate signal prior to its being input to the comparing means.
Claim 20
Dependent Claim
34 words
The system of claim 15 wherein said limit means includes an operational amplifier and a bridge rectifier and said biasing means includes a voltage source operatively connected to the input of said operational amplifier.
Claim 21
Dependent Claim
32 words
The system of claim 16 wherein said biasing means is responsive to a flap signal for reducing the amount of bias applied to said operational amplifier when the aircraft's flaps are down.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US2735081A
Cited
US2702342A
Cited
US2930035A
Cited
US2931221A
Cited
US2851120A
Cited
US3140483A
Cited
US3093807A
Cited
US3077557A
Cited
US3245076A
Cited
US3210760A
Cited
US3248728A
Cited
US3510092A
Cited
US3743221A
Cited
US3715718A
Cited
US3776518A
Cited
US3892373A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1979-01-19 | 1979-07-21 | 1980-01-20 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 1983-01-19 | 1983-07-21 | 1984-01-20 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 1987-01-19 | 1987-07-21 | 1988-01-20 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |