US3932270A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Method for determining hydrocarbon hydrotreating activity of a catalyst prior to its use in a hydrotreating process
Assignee: Atlantic Richfield Co
•
Filing: 1975-02-20
•
Granted: 1976-01-13
•
Expires: 1995-02-20
Abstract
Abstract An improved method of hydrocarbon hydrotreating is disclosed wherein the activity of a hydrotreating catalyst is determined prior to the catalyst being used to promote hydrocarbon hydrotreating. The catalytic activity of such a catalyst is determined by comparing a parameter involving the relative reflectance of the catalyst relative to the relative reflectance of a standard catalyst having acceptable activity. When it is determined that a given catalyst has catalytic activity at least essentially equal to that of the standard catalyst, the catalyst may be used to promote hydrocarbon hydrotreating thus providing an improved method of hydrocarbon hydrotreating.
Inventors
- 👤 Marvin F. L. Johnson
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-11-04 20:10
CPC Classifications
B; B01; B01J; B01J23/00; B01J23/70; B01J23/76; B01J23/84; B01J23/85; B01J27/00; B01J27/14; B01J27/186; B01J27/188; C; C10; C10G; C10G45/00; C10G45/02; C10G45/04; G; G01; G01N; G01N15/00; G01N15/08; G01N15/088; B01J2235/00
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 10
Claim 1
Independent Claim
300 words
A hydrocarbon hydrotreating process which comprises: 1. determining the hydrocarbon hydrotreating activity of a first catalyst comprising a major amount of a porous alumina support, a minor catalytically-effective amount of nickel, at least a portion of said nickel being present in the N++ form, and a minor catalytically-effective amount of at least one additional metal selected from the group consisting of molybdenum, tungsten, and mixtures thereof, at least a portion of said one additional metal being presesnt in an oxidized state, said hydrocarbon hydrotreating activity being determined according to a method comprising: a. determining the maximum relative reflectance of said first catalyst of light having a wave number in the range from about 16,000 cm. - 1 to about 17,000 cm. - 1 ; b. determining the maximum relative reflectance of said first catalyst of light having a wave number of about 20,000 cm - 1 ; c. determining an activity ratio equal to the relative reflectance determined in step (a) minus the relative reflectance determined in step (b); d. performing steps (a), (b) and (c) to determine the activity ratio of a standard catalyst having essentially the same elemental composition as said first catalyst and acceptable hydrocarbon hydrotreating activity; e. comparing the activity ratios obtained in steps (c) and (d), provided that (1) an increase in activity ratio from step (c) to step (d) being indicative of reduced hydrocarbon hydrotreating activity of said first catalyst relative to said standard catalyst, (2) no change in activity ratio from step (c) to step (d) being indicative of essentially equal hydrocarbon hydrotreating activity of said first catalyst relative to said standard catalyst and (3) a decrease in activity ratio from step (c) to step (d) being indicative of greater hydrocarbon hydrotreating activity of said first catalyst relative to said standard catalyst; 2.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim
300 words
A hydrocarbon hydrotreating process which comprises: 1. determining the hydrocarbon hydrotreating activity of a first catalyst comprising a major amount of a porous alumina support, a minor catalytically-effective amount of nickel, at least a portion of said nickel being present in the N++ form, and a minor catalytically-effective amount of at least one additional metal selected from the group consisting of molybdenum, tungsten, and mixtures thereof, at least a portion of said one additional metal being presesnt in an oxidized state, said hydrocarbon hydrotreating activity being determined according to a method comprising: a. determining the maximum relative reflectance of said first catalyst of light having a wave number in the range from about 16,000 cm. - 1 to about 17,000 cm. - 1 ; b. determining the maximum relative reflectance of said first catalyst of light having a wave number of about 20,000 cm - 1 ; c. determining an activity ratio equal to the relative reflectance determined in step (a) minus the relative reflectance determined in step (b); d. performing steps (a), (b) and (c) to determine the activity ratio of a standard catalyst having essentially the same elemental composition as said first catalyst and acceptable hydrocarbon hydrotreating activity; e. comparing the activity ratios obtained in steps (c) and (d), provided that (1) an increase in activity ratio from step (c) to step (d) being indicative of reduced hydrocarbon hydrotreating activity of said first catalyst relative to said standard catalyst, (2) no change in activity ratio from step (c) to step (d) being indicative of essentially equal hydrocarbon hydrotreating activity of said first catalyst relative to said standard catalyst and (3) a decrease in activity ratio from step (c) to step (d) being indicative of greater hydrocarbon hydrotreating activity of said first catalyst relative to said standard catalyst; 2.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
76 words
contacting a hydrocarbon feedstock containing at least one contaminant selected from the group consisting of sulfur, nitrogen and mixtures thereof with hydrogen in the presence of said first catalyst at conditions such that hydrogen forms compounds with at least one of said contaminants, provided that said first catalyst has a hydrocarbon hydrotreating activity at least essentially equal to that of said standard catalyst; and 3. recovering a hydrocarbon material having a reduced content of at least
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
76 words
contacting a hydrocarbon feedstock containing at least one contaminant selected from the group consisting of sulfur, nitrogen and mixtures thereof with hydrogen in the presence of said first catalyst at conditions such that hydrogen forms compounds with at least one of said contaminants, provided that said first catalyst has a hydrocarbon hydrotreating activity at least essentially equal to that of said standard catalyst; and 3. recovering a hydrocarbon material having a reduced content of at least
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
29 words
one of said contaminants relative to said feedstock. 2. The method of claim 1 wherein substantially all of the nickel of said first catalyst is in the Ni++ form.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
21 words
The method of claim 2 wherein said standard catalyst has substantially the same relative proportions of elements as said first catalyst.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
31 words
The method of claim 3 wherein said nickel is present in said first catalyst in an amount of from about 0.5 to about 15 percent by weight of said first catalyst.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
36 words
The method of claim 4 wherein said additional metal is present in said first catalyst in an amount from about 5 to about 40 percent by weight of said first catalyst (calculated as the metal trioxide).
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
27 words
The method of claim 5 wherein said first catalyst further includes a minor amount of phosphorus sufficient to improve the hydrocarbon hydrotreating activity of said first catalyst.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
31 words
The method of claim 6 wherein said nickel is present in said first catalyst in an amount of from about 1.5 to about 7 percent by weight of said first catalyst.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US3682836A
Cited
US3749664A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1979-01-12 | 1979-07-14 | 1980-01-13 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 1983-01-12 | 1983-07-14 | 1984-01-13 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 1987-01-12 | 1987-07-14 | 1988-01-13 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |