← Back to Patent Explorer
US3796498A Expired / Lapsed US ⏱️ 0.0 years remaining

Position measuring through the use of moire fringe multiplication

Assignee: Individual
•
Filing: 1971-05-14
•
Granted: 1974-03-12
•
Expires: 1991-05-14
📄 Original PDF 🌐 Google Patents 🔄 Sync Now

Abstract

Abstract A system for linear and angular measurements utilizing a form of moire fringe multiplication particularly in position measuring apparatus. The position of a table is determined by moire fringe multiplication with a coarse scale grating, an index member in juxtaposition with said scale grating, illumination, optical filtering, and observing means and means to indicate relative position of the table from changes of the said moire fringes.

Inventors

  • 👤 D Post

Bibliographic Details

Application Number —
Jurisdiction US
Data Source google_patents
Last Synchronized 2026-10-25 14:59
CPC Classifications
G; G01; G01D; G01D5/00; G01D5/26; G01D5/32; G01D5/34; G01D5/36; G01D5/38; G02; G02B; G02B27/00; G02B27/60

Claims Analysis

Total Claims: 17
Claim 1
Independent Claim 270 words
Apparatus in which the position of a table is determined by moire fringe multiplication comprising a table and base device, a coarse scale grating attached to one element of said device comprised of said table and its base, an index member in the form of a diffraction grating of frequency approximately a whole number Beta , exceeding three, times the frequency of said scale grating fixed to the other element of said table and base device in juxtaposition to said scale grating, an illumination means radiating a systematic bundle of rays obliquely upon said index member, whereupon said index member causes two dominant components of said rays to emerge with approximately symmetrical obliquities in the space between said index member and said scale grating, said two dominant components being subsequently diffracted by said scale grating, causing them to emerge from said arrangement of scale grating and index member as two sets of subcomponent rays, with a multiplicity of pairs of said subcompoNent rays, each pair comprised of a member from each set, traveling in a systematic sequence of diffracted directions, optical filtering means which subsequently intercepts said pairs of subcomponent rays and allows only one pair to proceed, namely, a favored pair that proceeds in a direction approximately normal to the plane of the scale grating, observing means that intercepts the said favored pair and senses the state of interference generated by said favored pair, said state of interference being manifest as fringes called moire fringes, and interpretation means to compare and indicate relative position of said table in relation to said base from changes of the said moire fringes.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim 270 words
Apparatus in which the position of a table is determined by moire fringe multiplication comprising a table and base device, a coarse scale grating attached to one element of said device comprised of said table and its base, an index member in the form of a diffraction grating of frequency approximately a whole number Beta , exceeding three, times the frequency of said scale grating fixed to the other element of said table and base device in juxtaposition to said scale grating, an illumination means radiating a systematic bundle of rays obliquely upon said index member, whereupon said index member causes two dominant components of said rays to emerge with approximately symmetrical obliquities in the space between said index member and said scale grating, said two dominant components being subsequently diffracted by said scale grating, causing them to emerge from said arrangement of scale grating and index member as two sets of subcomponent rays, with a multiplicity of pairs of said subcompoNent rays, each pair comprised of a member from each set, traveling in a systematic sequence of diffracted directions, optical filtering means which subsequently intercepts said pairs of subcomponent rays and allows only one pair to proceed, namely, a favored pair that proceeds in a direction approximately normal to the plane of the scale grating, observing means that intercepts the said favored pair and senses the state of interference generated by said favored pair, said state of interference being manifest as fringes called moire fringes, and interpretation means to compare and indicate relative position of said table in relation to said base from changes of the said moire fringes.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim 27 words
The apparatus of claim 1 in which said index member is a non-symmetrical blazed phase grating that exhibits dominant intensities in transmission for two neighboring diffraction orders.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim 25 words
The apparatus of claim 1 in which said index member is an amplitude grating that exhibits dominant intensities in transmission for two neighboring diffraction orders.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim 16 words
The apparatus of claim 1 in which said scale grating is a bar-and-space type amplitude grating.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim 27 words
The apparatus of claim 4 in which said index member is a non-symmetrical blazed phase grating that exhibits dominant intensities in transmission for two neighboring diffraction orders.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim 25 words
The apparatus of claim 4 in which said index member is an amplitude grating that exhibits dominant intensities in transmission for two neighboring diffraction orders.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim 25 words
The apparatus of claim 4 in which said index member is a phase grating that exhibits dominant intensities in transmission for two neighboring diffraction orders.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim 16 words
The apparatus of claim 1 in which said scale grating is a bar-and-space type phase grating.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim 27 words
The apparatus of claim 8 in which said index member is a non-symmetrical blazed phase grating that exhibits dominant intensities in transmission for two neighboring diffraction orders.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim 25 words
The apparatus of claim 8 in which said index member is an amplitude grating that exhibits dominant intensities in transmission for two neighboring diffraction orders.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim 16 words
The apparatus of claim 1 in which said scale grating is a symmetrically diffracting phase grating.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim 27 words
The apparatus of claim 11 in which said index member is a non-symmetrical blazed phase grating that exhibits dominant intensities in transmission for two neighboring diffraction orders.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim 25 words
The apparatus of claim 11 in which said index member is an amplitude grating that exhibits dominant intensities in transmission for two neighboring diffraction orders.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim 25 words
The apparatus of claim 1 in which said index member is a phase grating that exhibits dominant intensities in transmission for two neighboring diffraction orders.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim 93 words
The apparatus of claim 1 in which said favored pair of subcomponent rays emerges by transmission through said scale grating after one member of said favored pair experiences diffraction orders a, Beta /2 + s while the other member experiences diffraction orders a + 1, - Beta /2 + s, where the two terms separated by a comma represent diffraction orders at the said index member and said scale grating, respectively, and where a is a small whole number including zero and s is a whole number between - Beta and Beta .
Claim 17
Dependent Claim 105 words
The apparatus of claim 1 in which said favored pair of subcomponent rays emerges by reflection from said scale grating and subsequen transmission through said index member and one member of said favored pair experiences diffraction orders a, Beta /2 + s, 0, while the other member experiences diffraction orders a + 1, - Beta /2 + s, 0, where the three terms separated by commas represent diffraction orders experienced upon encountering the index member, scale grating and again the index member, respectively, and where a is a small whole number including zero and s is a whole number bEtween - Beta and Beta .

References Cited (Backward Citations)

US2886718A Cited
US3482107A Cited
US3588462A Cited
US3572937A Cited
US3586665A Cited
US3574292A Cited

USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows

Annuity Stage Window Opens Payment Deadline Surcharge Period Until Estimated Fee Status
3.5 Years (Year 4) 1977-03-11 1977-09-10 1978-03-12 $2000.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
7.5 Years (Year 8) 1981-03-11 1981-09-10 1982-03-12 $3760.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
11.5 Years (Year 12) 1985-03-11 1985-09-10 1986-03-12 $7700.00 Window Closed / Lapsed

Assigned Categories & Tags

No categories assigned to this patent yet.

Assign Category Tag