US3722270A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Non-destructive method of determining tire life
Assignee: Individual
•
Filing: 1971-02-12
•
Granted: 1973-03-27
•
Expires: 1991-02-12
Abstract
Abstract A non-destructive method of determining the durable life of a tire by measuring the lateral and radial force variations exhibited by the tire. A series of similar tires are measured for their force variations, and subjected to usage in order to determine the effect of the force variations upon the durable life characteristics of the series. The force variations exhibited by the tire are compared to the data obtained from the series of tires in order to non-destructively determine the life of the tire.
Inventors
- 👤 L Sperberg
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-11-02 11:10
CPC Classifications
B; B29; B29C; B29C35/00; B29C35/02; B29C35/0288; B29D; B29D30/00; B29D30/06; B29D30/0601; B29D30/0633; G; G01; G01M; G01M17/00; G01M17/007; G01M17/02; B29C37/00; B29C2037/90; B29K; B29K2021/00; B29K2105/00; B29K2105/24; B29L; B29L2030/00
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 56
Claim 1
Independent Claim
143 words
A method of determination of wear susceptibility of a tire comprising the steps of: 1. measuring the non-uniformity of force variations present in a predetermined number of like tires representative of said tire under identical test conditions; 2. measuring the rates of wear of said predetermined number of tires under specific conditions to thereby ascertain the effect of said force variationS upon the wear properties of said predetermined number of tires; 3. storing the force variation and wear data obtained in steps (1) and (2) to provide a dictionary of the effect of said force variations upon the wear properties of said predetermined number of tires; 4. measuring the non-uniformity of force variations present in said tire under said test conditions; 5. comparing the force variations of said tire to said stored data to thereby non-destructively determine the wear susceptability of said tire.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
143 words
A method of determination of wear susceptibility of a tire comprising the steps of: 1. measuring the non-uniformity of force variations present in a predetermined number of like tires representative of said tire under identical test conditions; 2. measuring the rates of wear of said predetermined number of tires under specific conditions to thereby ascertain the effect of said force variationS upon the wear properties of said predetermined number of tires; 3. storing the force variation and wear data obtained in steps (1) and (2) to provide a dictionary of the effect of said force variations upon the wear properties of said predetermined number of tires; 4. measuring the non-uniformity of force variations present in said tire under said test conditions; 5. comparing the force variations of said tire to said stored data to thereby non-destructively determine the wear susceptability of said tire.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
33 words
measuring the rates of wear of said predetermined number of tires under specific conditions to thereby ascertain the effect of said force variationS upon the wear properties of said predetermined number of tires;
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
33 words
measuring the rates of wear of said predetermined number of tires under specific conditions to thereby ascertain the effect of said force variationS upon the wear properties of said predetermined number of tires;
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
32 words
The method of claim 1 wherein the step of measuring the non-uniformity of force variations includes measuring the variation in tangential forces exerted by the footprints of said predetermined number of tires.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
53 words
wearing away at least part of the tread wearing surface of a portion of the tires of step (1) under specific conditions with the number of tires in said portion being of a sufficient sample size to enable the effect of the non-uniformity of force variations upon the wear property to be determined;
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
53 words
wearing away at least part of the tread wearing surface of a portion of the tires of step (1) under specific conditions with the number of tires in said portion being of a sufficient sample size to enable the effect of the non-uniformity of force variations upon the wear property to be determined;
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
40 words
storing the force variation and wear data of steps (1) and (2) to provide a dictionary of stored terms which relates the effect of the force variations upon the wear properties of said portion of the tires of step (1);
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
40 words
storing the force variation and wear data of steps (1) and (2) to provide a dictionary of stored terms which relates the effect of the force variations upon the wear properties of said portion of the tires of step (1);
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
11 words
The method of claim 1 and further including the step of:
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
34 words
storing the force variation and wear data obtained in steps (1) and (2) to provide a dictionary of the effect of said force variations upon the wear properties of said predetermined number of tires;
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
34 words
storing the force variation and wear data obtained in steps (1) and (2) to provide a dictionary of the effect of said force variations upon the wear properties of said predetermined number of tires;
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
14 words
measuring the non-uniformity of force variations present in said tire under said test conditions;
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
14 words
measuring the non-uniformity of force variations present in said tire under said test conditions;
Claim 15
Dependent Claim
11 words
The method of claim 1, and further including the steps of:
Claim 16
Dependent Claim
29 words
comparing the measured force variations of the unworn tires of step (1) to the stored data to thereby non-destructively determine the potential wear property of the unworn tires; and,
Claim 17
Dependent Claim
29 words
comparing the measured force variations of the unworn tires of step (1) to the stored data to thereby non-destructively determine the potential wear property of the unworn tires; and,
Claim 18
Dependent Claim
22 words
dividing the tires of step (4) into groups of tires wherein each tire of the same group has similar expected wear properties.
Claim 19
Dependent Claim
22 words
dividing the tires of step (4) into groups of tires wherein each tire of the same group has similar expected wear properties.
Claim 20
Dependent Claim
11 words
The method of claim 1, and further including the steps of:
Claim 21
Dependent Claim
21 words
comparing the force variations of said tire to said stored data to thereby non-destructively determine the wear susceptability of said tire.
Claim 22
Dependent Claim
21 words
comparing the force variations of said tire to said stored data to thereby non-destructively determine the wear susceptability of said tire.
Claim 23
Dependent Claim
26 words
selecting tires in accordance with the results of step (5) to thereby enable providing groups of tires wherein each said group exhibits similar degrees of imperfectness;
Claim 24
Dependent Claim
26 words
selecting tires in accordance with the results of step (5) to thereby enable providing groups of tires wherein each said group exhibits similar degrees of imperfectness;
Claim 25
Dependent Claim
47 words
selecting tires in accordance with the results of step (5) to enable providing groups of tires for test purposes wherein said tires of each group have comparable degrees of non-uniformity to thereby enable a true comparison to be established between the tires of the different test groups.
Claim 26
Dependent Claim
47 words
selecting tires in accordance with the results of step (5) to enable providing groups of tires for test purposes wherein said tires of each group have comparable degrees of non-uniformity to thereby enable a true comparison to be established between the tires of the different test groups.
Claim 27
Dependent Claim
13 words
subjecting the tread of said tire to a controlled tread rubber removing operation;
Claim 28
Dependent Claim
13 words
subjecting the tread of said tire to a controlled tread rubber removing operation;
Claim 29
Dependent Claim
10 words
subjecting the tread of said tire to a grinding operation;
Claim 30
Dependent Claim
10 words
subjecting the tread of said tire to a grinding operation;
Claim 31
Dependent Claim
9 words
carrying out step (5) for a plurality of tires;
Claim 32
Dependent Claim
9 words
carrying out step (5) for a plurality of tires;
Claim 33
Dependent Claim
11 words
The method of claim 1, and further including the steps of:
Claim 34
Dependent Claim
41 words
separating the tires of step (5) into a first and second group, wherein the first of said groups includes the tires exhibiting force variations which are of a smaller magnitude as compared to the remaining tires which form the second group;
Claim 35
Dependent Claim
41 words
separating the tires of step (5) into a first and second group, wherein the first of said groups includes the tires exhibiting force variations which are of a smaller magnitude as compared to the remaining tires which form the second group;
Claim 36
Dependent Claim
18 words
subjecting the tread of the tires of the second group to a controlled tread rubber removing operation, and
Claim 37
Dependent Claim
18 words
subjecting the tread of the tires of the second group to a controlled tread rubber removing operation, and
Claim 38
Dependent Claim
26 words
The method of claim 1 wherein the determination of true wear differences is utilized to prolong the life of the tire according to the following steps:
Claim 39
Dependent Claim
37 words
separating the tires of step (6) into a first and second group of tires, wherein the first group of tires each have force variations which are of a lower magnitude relative to the second group of tires;
Claim 40
Dependent Claim
37 words
separating the tires of step (6) into a first and second group of tires, wherein the first group of tires each have force variations which are of a lower magnitude relative to the second group of tires;
Claim 41
Dependent Claim
36 words
utilizing the stored data of step (4) to thereby determine the amount of rubber to remove from said tire in order to remove the apparent source of radial and lateral force variations determined in step (5).
Claim 42
Dependent Claim
36 words
utilizing the stored data of step (4) to thereby determine the amount of rubber to remove from said tire in order to remove the apparent source of radial and lateral force variations determined in step (5).
Claim 43
Dependent Claim
28 words
removing a predetermined amount of tread wearing compound from the tread wearing surface of the tire To thereby remove the apparent source of radial and lateral force variations.
Claim 44
Dependent Claim
28 words
removing a predetermined amount of tread wearing compound from the tread wearing surface of the tire To thereby remove the apparent source of radial and lateral force variations.
Claim 45
Dependent Claim
54 words
providing each tire with indicia identifying the tire with the group to which the tire belongs; whereby: a tire may be evaluated and identified to thereby enable it to be placed in service where the severity of usage to which the tire will be subjected does not exceed the durable capabilities of the tire.
Claim 46
Dependent Claim
54 words
providing each tire with indicia identifying the tire with the group to which the tire belongs; whereby: a tire may be evaluated and identified to thereby enable it to be placed in service where the severity of usage to which the tire will be subjected does not exceed the durable capabilities of the tire.
Claim 47
Dependent Claim
27 words
The method of claim 1 wherein the determination of true wear differences is utilized to prolong the life of the tire according to the following additional steps:
Claim 48
Dependent Claim
16 words
subjecting the tread of said second group of tires to a controlled tread rubber removing operation;
Claim 49
Dependent Claim
16 words
subjecting the tread of said second group of tires to a controlled tread rubber removing operation;
Claim 50
Dependent Claim
23 words
removing rubber from predetermined areas of the tread in accordance with step (7) so as to improve the force variation of step (4).
Claim 51
Dependent Claim
23 words
removing rubber from predetermined areas of the tread in accordance with step (7) so as to improve the force variation of step (4).
Claim 52
Dependent Claim
51 words
utilizing the stored data of step (4) to determine the amount and location of tread rubber to remove in step (8) in order to minimize the apparent source of force variations determined in step (4), to thereby improve the durability and resistance to abrasive wear of the second group of tires.
Claim 53
Dependent Claim
51 words
utilizing the stored data of step (4) to determine the amount and location of tread rubber to remove in step (8) in order to minimize the apparent source of force variations determined in step (4), to thereby improve the durability and resistance to abrasive wear of the second group of tires.
Claim 54
Independent Claim
15 words
A method of classifying tires according to the wear property thereof comprising the steps of:
Claim 55
Independent Claim
15 words
A method of classifying tires according to the wear property thereof comprising the steps of:
Claim 56
Dependent Claim
26 words
The method of claim 9 wherein each tire of a group is provided with indicia which identifies the group in which the tire has been classified.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US3397583A
Cited
US3563088A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1976-03-26 | 1976-09-25 | 1977-03-27 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 1980-03-26 | 1980-09-25 | 1981-03-27 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 1984-03-26 | 1984-09-25 | 1985-03-27 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |