← Back to Patent Explorer
US3657524A Expired / Lapsed US ⏱️ 0.0 years remaining

Dual mode process control with continuous feedback during coarse mode

Assignee: International Business Machines Corp
•
Filing: 1970-06-15
•
Granted: 1972-04-18
•
Expires: 1990-06-15
📄 Original PDF 🌐 Google Patents 🔄 Sync Now

Abstract

Abstract Dual mode process control having a coarse mode employing feedforward to change the process at a time-optimal rate to a new condition, and having a fine mode employing feedback for maintaining the process in the set condition. In coarse mode, a continuous prediction of the response of the controlled variable is made and is compared to the continuous feedback also used in fine mode. Any difference therebetween comprises an error and is employed to alter the coarse mode control of the manipulated variable. Thus, if an inaccuracy exists in the feedforward model of the process or if some outside change should occur to the process while in coarse mode, it is compensated for by adjustment to the coarse mode control of the manipulated variable.

Inventors

  • 👤 Roger M Bakke

Bibliographic Details

Application Number —
Jurisdiction US
Data Source google_patents
Last Synchronized 2026-10-23 14:57
CPC Classifications
G; G05; G05B; G05B13/00; G05B13/02; G05B13/0205; G05B13/0255; G05B13/021; G05B13/0215; G05B17/00

Claims Analysis

Total Claims: 12
Claim 1
Independent Claim 157 words
In a process having a manipulated variable and a controlled variable, said manipulated variable effecting control of said controlled variable, a method of coarse mode control changing said controlled variable to a new condition in response to a command signal designating said new condition, comprising the steps of: providing a control signal in response to said command signal for the operation of said manipulated variable in a predetermined manner to cause said change of said controlled variable; providing a feasible response signal representing the predicted response of said controlled variable to said control signal operation of said manipulated variable; measuring the actual response of said controlled variable, providing a measurement signal representing said actual response; comparing said feasible response signal to said measurement signal to provide an error signal indicating both the direction and magnitude of the difference therebetween; and summing algebraically said control signal and said error signal for controlling said manipulated variable in accordance therewith.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim 157 words
In a process having a manipulated variable and a controlled variable, said manipulated variable effecting control of said controlled variable, a method of coarse mode control changing said controlled variable to a new condition in response to a command signal designating said new condition, comprising the steps of: providing a control signal in response to said command signal for the operation of said manipulated variable in a predetermined manner to cause said change of said controlled variable; providing a feasible response signal representing the predicted response of said controlled variable to said control signal operation of said manipulated variable; measuring the actual response of said controlled variable, providing a measurement signal representing said actual response; comparing said feasible response signal to said measurement signal to provide an error signal indicating both the direction and magnitude of the difference therebetween; and summing algebraically said control signal and said error signal for controlling said manipulated variable in accordance therewith.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim 80 words
The method of claim 1 for additionally maintaining fine mode control of said controlled variable at said new condition, comprising: the additional step of, upon said feasible response signal reaching the value designated by said command signal on a steady state basis, maintaining said feasible response signal at said value designated by said command signal, whereby said measuring and comparing steps provide said error signal; and said summing step comprises controlling said manipulated variable in accordance with said error signal.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim 46 words
The method of claim 2, wherein said step of providing said control signal in response to said command signal includes arranging said control signal to operate said manipulated variable to cause said coarse mode change of said controlled variable at the optimum rate for said process.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim 57 words
The method of claim 3, wherein said manipulated variable may be varied only within preset limits; and wherein said step of providing said control signal includes arranging said control signal for operating said manipulated variable near one of said preset limits for the time required to change said controlled variable at the optimum rate for said process.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim 160 words
The method of claim 1 wherein said step of providing said control signal in response to said command signal includes the steps of: providing a manipulated variable signal representing the condition of said manipulated variable; comparing said manipulated variable signal to signals representing the limits of a predetermined tolerance range surrounding the initial steady state value of said manipulated variable to provide a signal indication of the result of said comparison indicating whether said manipulated variable condition is within or without said limits; and responding to said signal indication indicating said manipulated variable is within said limits to provide said control signal arranged to operate said manipulated variable to cause said change of said controlled variable at the optimum rate for said process, and responding to said signal indication indicating said manipulated variable is without said limits to provide said control signal arranged to operate said manipulated variable to cause said change of said controlled variable at a non-optimum rate.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim 80 words
The method of claim 5 for additionally maintaining fine mode control of said controlled variable at said new condition, comprising: the additional step of, upon said feasible response signal reaching the value designated by said command signal on a steady state basis, maintaining said feasible response signal at said value designated by said command signal, whereby said measuring and comparing steps provide said error signal; and Said summing step comprises controlling said manipualted variable in accordance with said error signal.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim 224 words
In a process control system for a process, said system having an input for receiving command signals, actuator means for controlling a manipulated variable of said process, and measuring means for supplying a measurement signal measuring a controlled variable of said process, said manipulated variable effecting control of said controlled variable, there being a predetermined model of said process representing the relationship between said manipulated variable and said controlled variable, the improvement thereto for coarse mode control of said process to change said controlled variable to a new condition in response to a command signal at said input designating said new condition, comprising: control and feasible response means responsive to said command signal for supplying a control signal for operating said actuator means to control said manipulated variable in a predetermined manner to cause said change of said controlled variable, and for supplying a feasible response signal in accordance with said predetermined model of said process, said feasible response signal representing the predicted response of said controlled variable to said control signal operation of said manipulated variable; comparison means comparing said feasible response signal to said measurement signal to provide an error signal indicating both the direction and magnitude of the difference therebetween; and summing means for algebraically summing said control signal and said error signal to operate said actuator means in accordance therewith.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim 224 words
In a process control system for a process, said system having an input for receiving command signals, actuator means for controlling a manipulated variable of said process, and measuring means for supplying a measurement signal measuring a controlled variable of said process, said manipulated variable effecting control of said controlled variable, there being a predetermined model of said process representing the relationship between said manipulated variable and said controlled variable, the improvement thereto for coarse mode control of said process to change said controlled variable to a new condition in response to a command signal at said input designating said new condition, comprising: control and feasible response means responsive to said command signal for supplying a control signal for operating said actuator means to control said manipulated variable in a predetermined manner to cause said change of said controlled variable, and for supplying a feasible response signal in accordance with said predetermined model of said process, said feasible response signal representing the predicted response of said controlled variable to said control signal operation of said manipulated variable; comparison means comparing said feasible response signal to said measurement signal to provide an error signal indicating both the direction and magnitude of the difference therebetween; and summing means for algebraically summing said control signal and said error signal to operate said actuator means in accordance therewith.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim 42 words
The process control system of claim 7 for additionally maintaining fine mode control of said controlled variable at said new condition, wherein said control and feasible response means additionally maintains said feasible response signal at the value designated by said command signal.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim 57 words
The process control system of claim 8 wherein said actuator means may be operated only within preset limits; and wherein said control and feasible response means supplies said control signal for operating said actuator means near one of said preset limits for the time required to change said controlled variable at the optimum rate for said process.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim 248 words
The process control system of claim 9 additionally including: means for supplying a manipulated variable signal representing the condition of said actuator means; and said control and feasible response means comprises: means responsive to the occurrency of said command signal for determining from said measurement signal the corresponding initial steady state value of the manipulated variable; means responsive to said determined initial steady state value of the manipulated variable and to signals representing the limits of a predetermined tolerance range for comparing said manipulated variable signal to said limits representing said tolerance range surrounding said initial steady state value to provide a signal indication of whether said actuator means condition is within or without said limits of said range; control means responsive to said signal indication indicating said actuator means condition is within said limits to provide said control signal for operating said actuator means to control said manipulated variable to cause said optimum rate for said process, and responsive to said signal indication indicating said actuator means condition is without said limits to provide said control signal for operating said actuator means to control said manipulated variable to cause said change of said controlled variable at a non-optimum rate; and feasible response means for supplying a feasible response signal in accordance with said predetermined model of said process, said feasible response signal representing the predicted response of said controlled variable to said control of said manipulated variable by said actuator in accordance with said provided contRol signal.

References Cited (Backward Citations)

US3446946A Cited

USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows

Annuity Stage Window Opens Payment Deadline Surcharge Period Until Estimated Fee Status
3.5 Years (Year 4) 1975-04-18 1975-10-18 1976-04-18 $2000.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
7.5 Years (Year 8) 1979-04-18 1979-10-18 1980-04-18 $3760.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
11.5 Years (Year 12) 1983-04-18 1983-10-18 1984-04-18 $7700.00 Window Closed / Lapsed

Assigned Categories & Tags

No categories assigned to this patent yet.

Assign Category Tag