US3655476A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Method of making honeycomb core
Assignee: Orbitex Inc
•
Filing: 1969-05-26
•
Granted: 1972-04-11
•
Expires: 1989-05-26
Abstract
Abstract Two webs are imprinted with transverse lines of adhesive, the pattern on one web being staggered with respect to the pattern on the other web, so that if properly cut and stacked, there can be formed a lay-up which may eventually be expanded to produce honeycomb core.
Inventors
- 👤 Burton L Siegal
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-11-02 10:25
CPC Classifications
B; B31; B31D; B31D3/00; B31D3/02; B31D3/0223; B31D3/0276; Y; Y10; Y10T; Y10T156/00; Y10T156/10; Y10T156/1002; Y10T156/1003; Y10T156/1052; Y10T156/1062; Y10T156/1067; Y10T156/1069; Y10T156/12; Y10T156/13
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 20
Claim 1
Independent Claim
313 words
In a method of making honeycomb core structure in a stack suitable for further processing by at least expanding the same and in which a pair of webs is laminated face-to-back, each web having a pattern of transversely printed adhesive node lines thereon, the pattern of one web being staggered along its length with respect to the other, and in which the laminated web is cut into a plurality of equal lengths that are stacked one upon the other to form a lay-up, the steps of: A. printing the patterns of node lines side-by-side along the length of a double width web, on one face thereof, with the patterns staggered along the length of the web, each pattern occupying somewhat less than half of the web, respectively, B. perforating the web along its length on two transversely spaced rows, one row being in a clear path between the side edge of one pattern and one edge of the double width web, the other being in a clear path between patterns, the perforation pitch of each row being equal along the row and each perforation of one row being transversely aligned with an identical perforation in the other row normally to the rows irrespective of the staggered arrangement of the patterns relative one another, C. dividing the web along its centeR to provide a pair of half webs each having a pattern and a row of perforations, D. bringing together the half webs with their perforations in register and without changing their lengthwise relative orientation substantially, to form a two-ply web prior to cutting, the cut length dimension being chosen as a multiple of a minimum dimension at which one pattern of adhesive lines has a whole number of node pitches and the row of perforations has a whole number of perforation pitches, both numbers being repetitive for each of said minimum dimension occurring.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim
313 words
In a method of making honeycomb core structure in a stack suitable for further processing by at least expanding the same and in which a pair of webs is laminated face-to-back, each web having a pattern of transversely printed adhesive node lines thereon, the pattern of one web being staggered along its length with respect to the other, and in which the laminated web is cut into a plurality of equal lengths that are stacked one upon the other to form a lay-up, the steps of: A. printing the patterns of node lines side-by-side along the length of a double width web, on one face thereof, with the patterns staggered along the length of the web, each pattern occupying somewhat less than half of the web, respectively, B. perforating the web along its length on two transversely spaced rows, one row being in a clear path between the side edge of one pattern and one edge of the double width web, the other being in a clear path between patterns, the perforation pitch of each row being equal along the row and each perforation of one row being transversely aligned with an identical perforation in the other row normally to the rows irrespective of the staggered arrangement of the patterns relative one another, C. dividing the web along its centeR to provide a pair of half webs each having a pattern and a row of perforations, D. bringing together the half webs with their perforations in register and without changing their lengthwise relative orientation substantially, to form a two-ply web prior to cutting, the cut length dimension being chosen as a multiple of a minimum dimension at which one pattern of adhesive lines has a whole number of node pitches and the row of perforations has a whole number of perforation pitches, both numbers being repetitive for each of said minimum dimension occurring.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
45 words
The method as claimed in claim 1 in which the step of dividing is accomplished by slitting the web along two lines, each of which is spaced the same lateral distance from a row of perforations and in which the stacking is accomplished by spindling.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
123 words
printing a pattern of node lines on each web in the same imperforate area, identically spaced from the respective rows, of identical node pitch, but with one pattern displaced from the other by half a node pitch, relative to the identical transverse alignment of perforations, B. bringing the webs together alternately in face-to-back engagement with their perforations registered to form a two-ply web prior to cutting, and C. cutting the two-ply web at a length chosen as a multiple of a minimum dimension at which one pattern of adhesive lines has a whole number of node pitches and the row of perforations alongside said pattern has a whole number of perforation pitches, both numbers being repetitive for each of said minimum dimension occurring.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
123 words
printing a pattern of node lines on each web in the same imperforate area, identically spaced from the respective rows, of identical node pitch, but with one pattern displaced from the other by half a node pitch, relative to the identical transverse alignment of perforations, B. bringing the webs together alternately in face-to-back engagement with their perforations registered to form a two-ply web prior to cutting, and C. cutting the two-ply web at a length chosen as a multiple of a minimum dimension at which one pattern of adhesive lines has a whole number of node pitches and the row of perforations alongside said pattern has a whole number of perforation pitches, both numbers being repetitive for each of said minimum dimension occurring.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
41 words
The method as claimed in claim 1 and the additional steps of cutting the two-ply web into double sheets of equal length and stacking the double sheets with the perforations in register and the ends of said sheets in vertical alignment.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
25 words
The method as claimed in claim 3 in which the stacking is performed by spindling on at least one selected matched perforation of each sheet.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
36 words
The method as claimed in claim 2 in which the stacking is accomplished by spindling on an end perforation of each sheet and using the side edge opposite the row of perforations as an alignment reference.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
101 words
The method as claimed in claim 1 in which the node lines are applied by a printing cylinder of circumference C, in which the node line pitch is Pc, and in which the perforation pitch is R and the relationship between these factors is defined by the formula L MX where L is the length of the sheet and M is any whole number multiple and X is said minimum dimension and is a whole number factor of the circumference of the print roll and also satisfies the expression: X nPc mR C/u where n, m, and u are whole numbers.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
42 words
The method as claimed in claim 6 and the additional step of changing the cell size of the resultant honeycomb core structure solely by substituting for said printing cylinder, another printing cylinder having the same circumference but a different node line pitch.
Claim 11
Independent Claim
199 words
The method of making honeycomb core structures of different cell sizes on the same machine in different runs with a minimum modification of the machine for each cell size, comprising the steps of: A. printing, with a print roller of circumference C, a pattern of node lines of pitch Pc on the halves of a double width web; B. staggering the node lines in one pattern relative to the other; C. applying perforations of pitch R along an edge of each pattern in identical transverse location along the length of the web; D. slitting the double web in half after printing and applying the perforations; E. registering the two half webs in face to back engagement with the perforations of one half registered with those of the other half; F. cutting simultaneously the engaged half webs in equal lengths L of any multiple M of a whole number X; G. said steps of printing, applying perforations, and cutting in combination determining the dimensional requirements of X nPc mR C/u where n, m, and u are whole numbers and; H. changing only the print roller pitch Pc to a different value for said printing step for each respective cell size.
Claim 12
Independent Claim
199 words
The method of making honeycomb core structures of different cell sizes on the same machine in different runs with a minimum modification of the machine for each cell size, comprising the steps of: A. printing, with a print roller of circumference C, a pattern of node lines of pitch Pc on the halves of a double width web; B. staggering the node lines in one pattern relative to the other; C. applying perforations of pitch R along an edge of each pattern in identical transverse location along the length of the web; D. slitting the double web in half after printing and applying the perforations; E. registering the two half webs in face to back engagement with the perforations of one half registered with those of the other half; F. cutting simultaneously the engaged half webs in equal lengths L of any multiple M of a whole number X; G. said steps of printing, applying perforations, and cutting in combination determining the dimensional requirements of X nPc mR C/u where n, m, and u are whole numbers and; H. changing only the print roller pitch Pc to a different value for said printing step for each respective cell size.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
100 words
In a method of making honeycomb core structure in a stack suitable for further processing by at least expanding the same and in which a pair of webs is laminated face-to-back, each web having a pattern of transversely printed adhesive node lines thereon, the pattern of one web being staggered along its length with respect to the other, and in which the laminated web is cut into a plurality of equal lengths that are staCked one upon the other to form a lay-up, the steps of: A. printing node lines and perforating each web in accordance with the following arrangements:
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
100 words
In a method of making honeycomb core structure in a stack suitable for further processing by at least expanding the same and in which a pair of webs is laminated face-to-back, each web having a pattern of transversely printed adhesive node lines thereon, the pattern of one web being staggered along its length with respect to the other, and in which the laminated web is cut into a plurality of equal lengths that are staCked one upon the other to form a lay-up, the steps of: A. printing node lines and perforating each web in accordance with the following arrangements:
Claim 15
Dependent Claim
16 words
The method as claimed in claim 9 in which the printing is done before the perforating.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim
54 words
The method as claimed in claim 9 in which the two webs comprise halves of a double web and the printing and perforating are performed on said double web, and which includes the further step of slitting said double web along its center to form the said two webs prior to bringing them together.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim
101 words
The method as claimed in claim 9 in which the node lines are applied by a printing cylinder of circumference C, in which the node line pitch is Pc, and in which the perforation pitch is R and the relationship between these factors is defined by the formula L MX where L is the length of the sheet and M is any whole number multiple and X is said minimum dimension and is a whole number factor of the circumference of the print roll and also satisfies the expression: X nPc mR C/u where n, m, and u are whole numbers.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim
101 words
The method as claimed in claim 10 in which the node lines are applied by a printing cylinder of circumference C, in which the node line pitch is Pc, and in which the perforation pitch is R and the relationship between these factors is defined by the formula L MX where L is the length of the sheet and M is any whole number multiple and X is said minimum dimension and is a whole number factor of the circumference of the print roll and also satisfies the expression: X nPc mR C/u where n, m, and u are whole numbers.
Claim 19
Dependent Claim
54 words
The method as claimed in claim 10 in which the two webs comprise halves of a double web and the printing and perforating are performed on said double web, and which includes the further step of slitting said double web along its center to form the said two webs prior to bringing them together.
Claim 20
Dependent Claim
101 words
The method as claimed in claim 14 in which the node lines are applied by a printing cylinder of circumference C, in which the node line pitch is Pc, and in which the perforation pitch is R and the relationship between these factors is defined by the formula L MX where L is the length of the sheet and M is any whole number multiple and X is said minimum dimension and is a whole number factor of the circumference of the print roll and also satisfies the expression: X nPc mR C/u where n, m, and u are whole numbers.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1975-04-11 | 1975-10-11 | 1976-04-11 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 1979-04-11 | 1979-10-11 | 1980-04-11 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 1983-04-11 | 1983-10-11 | 1984-04-11 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |