← Back to Patent Explorer
US3634145A Expired / Lapsed US ⏱️ 0.0 years remaining

Case-hardened metals

Assignee: PELTZ NELSON
•
Filing: 1968-12-09
•
Granted: 1972-01-11
•
Expires: 1988-12-09
📄 Original PDF 🌐 Google Patents 🔄 Sync Now

Abstract

Abstract A process of boronizing a metal article is described which comprises immersing the selected metal article in a fused bath composed of at least one alkali metal halide or alkaline earth metal halide and a boron slat of the empirical formula MxByFz wherein M is an alkali metal, and the ratio of x:y:z is 1:0.4 to 2.0:0.5 to 2.5 with y being preferably above 1 and z is preferably below 1.5, the fused bath being maintained at a temperature between 1,200* to 1,750* F. for a sufficient duration to impregnate the metal with boron. There is also described novel boron products, their process of manufacture and salt baths containing such boron products. The process produces extremely hard, uniform, adherent and corrosion resistant boride casing on metals such as carbon and alloy steels.

Inventors

  • 👤 Oris T Homan

Bibliographic Details

Application Number —
Jurisdiction US
Data Source google_patents
Last Synchronized 2026-10-26 16:10
CPC Classifications
C; C23; C23C; C23C8/00; C23C8/40; C23C8/42; C25; C25D; C25D3/00; C25D3/66

Claims Analysis

Total Claims: 15
Claim 1
Independent Claim 17 words
A product according to claim 1 wherein the ratio of x:y:z is 1:1 to 2:0.5 to 1.5.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim 12 words
A product according to claim 1 wherein the alkali metal is sodium.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim 93 words
A fused salt bath composition comprising (a) a product of the empirical formula MxByFz wherein M is an alkali metal, B is boron, F is the fluoride ion and in which the ratio of x:y:z is 1:0.4 to 2:0.5 to 2.5 and (b) at least one halide salt selected from the class consisting of alkali metal halides and alkali earth halides, said halide salt being the predominant salt in said bath and said product defined in (a) comprising about 10 to about 35 percent by weight of said halide salt in said bath.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim 17 words
A salt bath according to claim 4 wherein said halide salt comprises two different alkali metal halides.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim 18 words
A salt bath according to claim 5 wherein the ratio of x:y:z is 1:1 to 2:0.5 to 1.5.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim 16 words
A salt bath according to claim 5 wherein saiD alkali metal halides are alkali metal chlorides.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim 33 words
A salt bath according to claim 5 wherein the cation portion of one of said alkali metal halides is the same as the cation portion of said product of the empirical formula MxByFz.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim 13 words
A salt bath according to claim 8 wherein said cation portion is sodium.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim 26 words
A salt bath according to claim 4 wherein said product defined in (a) comprises about 20 to 35 percent by weight of said salt bath composition.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim 18 words
A salt bath according to claim 10 wherein said alkali metal chlorides are sodium chloride and lithium chloride.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim 18 words
A salt bath according to claim 10 wherein said alkali metal chlorides are potassium chloride and sodium chloride.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim 24 words
A salt bath according to claim 10 wherein said alkali metal halides comprise at least 50 percent by weight of said salt bath composition.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim 68 words
A fused salt bath composition comprising (a) a product of the empirical formula MxByFz wherein M is an alkali metal, B is boron, F is the fluoride ion and the ratio of x:y:z is 1:0.4 to 2:0.5 to 2.5 and (b) at least two alkali metal chlorides, said product of the empirical formula MxByFz comprising about 20 to about 35 percent by weight of said salt bath composition.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim 19 words
A fused salt bath according to claim 14 wherein said alkali metal chlorides are sodium chloride and lithium chloride.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim 12 words
A fused salt bath according to claim 15 wherein M is sodium.

References Cited (Backward Citations)

US2465989A Cited
US2572248A Cited
US2940911A Cited
US3201286A Cited
US3201285A Cited
US3251719A Cited

USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows

Annuity Stage Window Opens Payment Deadline Surcharge Period Until Estimated Fee Status
3.5 Years (Year 4) 1975-01-10 1975-07-12 1976-01-11 $2000.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
7.5 Years (Year 8) 1979-01-10 1979-07-12 1980-01-11 $3760.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
11.5 Years (Year 12) 1983-01-10 1983-07-12 1984-01-11 $7700.00 Window Closed / Lapsed

Assigned Categories & Tags

No categories assigned to this patent yet.

Assign Category Tag