← Back to Patent Explorer
US3596838A Expired / Lapsed US ⏱️ 0.0 years remaining

Flotation of sulphide ores

Assignee: Individual
•
Filing: 1968-05-07
•
Granted: 1971-08-03
•
Expires: 1988-05-07
📄 Original PDF 🌐 Google Patents 🔄 Sync Now

Abstract

Abstract Flotation of sulphide minerals from their ores is achieved by a process in which two or more conditioning steps are carried out prior to a froth flotation step. The first step comprises conditioning a pulp of the ore in the presence of at least one alkaline agent selected from a group of agents which is defined in the specification which follows. The pulp is then further conditioned in the presence of a member of the xanthate family of flotation reagents and sufficient sodium silicate to effectively disperse the host rock minerals. The resulting pulp is then subjected to froth flotation. Preferably there are three separate conditioning steps, namely conditioning carried out in the presence of (1) one of the hereinafter defined alkaline agents, (2) a member of the xanthate family of flotation reagents, and (3) sodium silicate. The invention is particularly valuable for the recovery of metallic sulphides from ores containing talcy minerals or natural slimes and the invention has been applied with signal success to the flotation of copper-nickel sulphide ores containing over 40 percent by weight of talcose host rock minerals.

Inventors

  • 👤 David Weston

Bibliographic Details

Application Number —
Jurisdiction US
Data Source google_patents
Last Synchronized 2026-10-28 16:14
CPC Classifications
B; B03; B03D; B03D1/00; B03D1/02; Y; Y10; Y10S; Y10S209/00; Y10S209/901

Claims Analysis

Total Claims: 18
Claim 1
Independent Claim 45 words
A process as defined in claim 1, in which the sodium silicate is present in a minimum amount equivalent to about 30 pounds of sodium silicate per ton of solids in said pulp up to an amount where further quantities show no further beneficial effect.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim 24 words
A process as defined in claim 1, in which the first-conditioning step is at least partially carried out during one or more wet-grinding stages.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim 23 words
A process as defined in claim 1, in which the entire first-conditioning step is carried out subsequently to one or more wet-grinding stages.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim 15 words
A process as defined in claim 1, in which the alkaline agent is sodium carbonate.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim 15 words
A process as defined in claim 1, in which the alkaline agent is ammonium hydroxide.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim 18 words
A process as defined in claim 1, in which the alkaline agents are sodium carbonate and ammonium hydroxide.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim 20 words
A process as defined in claim 1, in which the alkaline agents are sodium carbonate, ammonium hydroxide and calcium hydroxide.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim 18 words
A process as defined in claim 1, in which the alkaline agents are sodium carbonate and sodium hydroxide.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim 18 words
A process as defined in claim 1, in which the alkaline agents are sodium carbonate and calcium hydroxide.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim 21 words
A process as defined in claim 1, in which copper sulphate is added as an activating agent during said first-conditioning step.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim 27 words
A process as defined in claim 1, in which a trimethyl nonyl ether of polyethylene glycol is added as a wetting agent during said first conditioning step.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim 17 words
A process as defined in claim 1, in which the xanthate reagent employed is sodium amyl xanthate.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim 17 words
A process as defined in claim 1, in which the xanthate reagent employed is potassium amyl xanthate.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim 238 words
A process for the flotation recovery of copper and nickel sulphide minerals from ores containing both such minerals by a process in which at least two-conditioning steps precede flotation, said process consisting essentially of (a) a first-conditioning step wherein the ore, together with such activating agents and wetting agents as are to Be used, is conditioned in the presence of at least one alkaline agent selected from the group consisting of alkali metal carbonates, ammonium hydroxide, mixtures of these two compounds, and mixtures comprising at least one of these compounds and at least one hydroxide selected from the group consisting of sodium potassium, and calcium hydroxides, in an amount calculated to bring the pH of the resulting pulp up to a point within the optimum range of flotation of the said minerals, for a period of time sufficient to activate said minerals, then (b) a second-conditioning step wherein the pulp resulting from the first step is conditioned in the presence of a selected member of the family of xanthate flotation reagents for a period of time determined by experiment to produce maximum activation of said minerals; then (c) a third conditioning step wherein the pulp resulting from the second step is conditioned in the presence of sodium silicate in an amount and for a time, predetermined by experiment, to be sufficient to effectively disperse the host rock minerals; and then (d) subjecting the resulting pulp to froth flotation.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim 25 words
A process as defined in claim 15, in which the second-conditioning step is carried out for a period of from 10 to about 30 minutes.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim 23 words
A process as defined in claim 15, in which the third-conditioning step is carried out for a period of less than 10 minutes.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim 43 words
A process as defined in claim 15, in which the second-conditioning step is carried out for a period of from about 10 to about 30 minutes, and in which the third-conditioning step is carried out for a period of less than 10 minutes.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim 39 words
A process as defined in claim 15, in which the sodium silicate is added as dispersant during both the first and third-conditioning steps, the amount added in the first step being less than that added in the third step.

References Cited (Backward Citations)

CA616256A Cited
CA616687A Cited
GB191505454A Cited
US1417263A Cited
US2467369A Cited
US2611485A Cited
US2693278A Cited
US2695101A Cited
US3094484A Cited

USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows

Annuity Stage Window Opens Payment Deadline Surcharge Period Until Estimated Fee Status
3.5 Years (Year 4) 1974-08-02 1975-02-01 1975-08-03 $2000.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
7.5 Years (Year 8) 1978-08-02 1979-02-01 1979-08-03 $3760.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
11.5 Years (Year 12) 1982-08-02 1983-02-01 1983-08-03 $7700.00 Window Closed / Lapsed

Assigned Categories & Tags

No categories assigned to this patent yet.

Assign Category Tag