← Back to Patent Explorer
EP1128217A2 Expired / Lapsed EP ⏱️ 0.0 years remaining

Method of measuring aberration in an optical imaging system

Assignee: ASML Netherlands BV
•
Filing: 2001-02-21
•
Granted: —
•
Expires: 2021-02-21
📄 Original PDF 🌐 Google Patents 🔄 Sync Now

Abstract

Abstract A method of determining aberration of an optical imaging system comprises measuring at least one parameter, such as position of best-focus and/or lateral position, of an image formed by the imaging system. This is repeated for a plurality of different illumination settings of the imaging system, and from these measurements at least one coefficient, representative of aberration of said imaging system, is calculated.

Inventors

  • 👤 Hans Van Der Laan
  • 👤 Marco Hugo Petrus Moers

Bibliographic Details

Application Number —
Jurisdiction EP
Data Source google_patents
Last Synchronized 2026-11-09 01:26
CPC Classifications
G; G03; G03F; G03F7/00; G03F7/70; G03F7/70483; G03F7/70591; G03F7/706

Claims Analysis

Total Claims: 18
Claim 1
Independent Claim 140 words
A method of determining aberration of an optical imaging system comprising: a radiation system for supplying a projection beam of radiation; a support structure for supporting patterning means, the patterning means serving to pattern the projection beam according to a desired pattern; a substrate table for holding a substrate; and a projection system for projecting the patterned beam onto a target portion of the substrate; the method comprising the step of: patterning the projection beam with said patterning means, and characterized by the steps of: measuring at least one parameter of an image formed by the projection system, for a plurality of different settings of said radiation system and/or said projection system; and calculating at least one coefficient, representative of aberration of said imaging system, on the basis of said at least one parameter measured at said plurality of settings.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim 17 words
A method according to claim 1, wherein said plurality of different settings comprise different numerical aperture settings.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim 28 words
A method according to claim 1 or 2, wherein said plurality of different settings comprise different settings of pupil filling at a pupil plane in the imaging system.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim 30 words
A method according to claim 1, 2 or 3, wherein said plurality of different settings comprise different illumination modes selected from the group comprising disc-shaped, annular, quadrupolar, dipolar and soft-multipolar.
Claim 5
Independent Claim 29 words
A method according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein said plurality of different settings comprise telecentric and non-telecentric illumination settings, or a plurality of non-telecentric illumination settings.
Claim 6
Independent Claim 25 words
A method according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein said at least one parameter is the position of best focus of said image.
Claim 7
Independent Claim 23 words
A method according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein said at least one parameter is the lateral position of said image.
Claim 8
Independent Claim 34 words
A method according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein said plurality of different settings are selected such that the variation in the or each at least one measured parameter is substantially maximized.
Claim 9
Independent Claim 61 words
A method according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein said plurality of different settings are selected such that the variation in said at least one measured parameter resulting from aberration represented by one or more of said coefficients is substantially zero, whilst the variation in said at least one parameter as the function of a desired coefficient is non-zero.
Claim 10
Independent Claim 47 words
A method according to any one of the preceding claims, further comprising the step of calculating a theoretical variation, for each of said plurality of different illumination settings, of the or each measured parameter as a function of a small change in said at least one coefficient.
Claim 11
Independent Claim 31 words
A method according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein said at least one coefficient is calculated by multiple regression or a least-square fit of a set of simultaneous equations.
Claim 12
Independent Claim 19 words
A method according to any one the preceding claims, wherein said at least one coefficient is a Zernike coefficient.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim 165 words
A lithographic projection apparatus for projecting a patterned beam of radiation onto a substrate provided with a radiation-sensitive layer, the apparatus comprising: a radiation system for providing a projection beam of radiation; a support structure for supporting patterning means, the patterning means serving to pattern the projection beam according to a desired pattern; a substrate table for holding a substrate; a projection system for projecting the patterned beam onto a target portion of the substrate; and illumination setting means for providing a plurality of different illumination settings of said radiation system and/or said projection system; characterized by further comprising: measuring means for measuring at least one parameter of a projected image formed by the projection system; control means for selecting a plurality of different illumination settings at which said measuring means takes measurements; and calculation means for calculating at least one coefficient, representative of aberration of said projection and/or radiation system, on the basis of said at least one parameter measured by said measuring means.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim 18 words
An apparatus according to Claim 13, wherein the support structure comprises a mask table for holding a mask.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim 14 words
An apparatus according to Claim 13, wherein the radiation system comprises a radiation source.
Claim 16
Independent Claim 170 words
A method of manufacturing a device using a lithographic projection apparatus, comprising the steps of: (a) providing a substrate that is at least partially covered by a layer of radiation-sensitive material; (b) providing a projection beam of radiation using a radiation system; (c) using patterning means to endow the projection beam with a pattern in its cross-section; (d) using a projection system to project the patterned beam of radiation onto a target portion of the layer of radiation-sensitive material, and characterized by the steps of: measuring, prior to step (d), at least one parameter of an image formed by the projection system, for a plurality of different settings of said radiation system and/or said projection system; calculating at least one coefficient, representative of aberration of said projection and/or radiation system, on the basis of said at least one parameter measured at said plurality of settings; correcting for said aberration on the basis of said at least one calculated coefficient, to reduce aberration of an image projected by said projection system.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim 28 words
A method according to claim 16, wherein said correction step comprises correcting for changes in lateral and/or best-focus position of said image when changing between different illumination settings.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim 12 words
A device manufactured according to the method of claim 16 or 17.

References Cited (Backward Citations)

No citation records indexed.

USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows

Maintenance schedule is calculated for granted US utility patents.

Assigned Categories & Tags

No categories assigned to this patent yet.

Assign Category Tag