EP0883873B1
Expired / Lapsed
EP
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Airport guidance system, in particular airport surface movement guidance and control system
Assignee: Siemens AG
•
Filing: 1997-02-28
•
Granted: 1999-12-22
•
Expires: 2017-02-28
Abstract
Abstract An airport surface movement guidance and control system (SMGCS) involving detection, integrated processing and graphical display of the relevant, in particular the safety-relevant, positions and movements of aircraft, and optionally, vehicles, on airside (runway, taxiways, apron) and in the relevant airport airspace. At least one radar detects the positions and movements between airborne and parked positions of the aircraft. The relevant data are displayed after data concentration on the monitor of at least one controller station in graphical form and/or letter or number form. As a result, the operational management of the surface movement can be planned and executed from the at least one controller station by means of solely the SMGC system.
Inventors
- 👤 Robert Castor
- 👤 Lothar Belger
- 👤 André JELU
- 👤 Per Ingar Skaar
- 👤 Einar Henriksen
- 👤 Fredrik Berg-Nielsen
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
EP
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-10-30 10:10
CPC Classifications
G; G08; G08G; G08G5/00; G08G5/50; G08G5/51; G01; G01S; G01S13/00; G01S13/88; G01S13/91; G08G5/20; G08G5/22; G08G5/70; G08G5/72; G08G5/727; G01S2013/916
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 21
Claim 1
Independent Claim
164 words
Airport surface movement guidance and control
system (SMGCS) with radar detection, integrated processing
and integrated graphical display in the form of a
radar video on at least one monitor for the relevant,
in particular the safety-relevant positions and
movements of aircraft, and, possibly, vehicles, on all
relevant airside areas (runway, taxiways, apron) and in
the relevant airport airspace (CTR) for the operational
management of airport traffic, the operational
management being carried out by using at least one
radar to detect the aircraft, to discriminate between
air movement and stationary, parked aircraft,
essentially using the detailed radar video monitor
display, the relevant data being displayed after data
concentration, on the monitor of at least one
controller, including the ground traffic signal states
in video form and character or numeric form, in such a
way that the controller can input the ground traffic
signals which manage the aircraft and vehicles, for
example for stop bars, docking instruction notices
etc., to signal transmitters in a safety-related
manner.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim
51 words
Airport surface movement guidance and control
system according to Claim 1, characterized in that the
detection and operational management include vehicle
movements on airside, for example with the aid of
transponder interrogations or squitters by transponders,
via ID tags and wire-free communications
means, which can also be used for transmitting
instructions.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
33 words
Airport surface movement guidance and control
system according to Claim 1 or 2, characterized in that
the airborne movements in the approach and departure
area are included in the detection and operational
management.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
51 words
Airport surface movement guidance and control
system according to Claim 1, 2 or 3, characterized in
that said system has a primary and/or secondary radar,
the primary radar being used for location on airside,
and the secondary radar preferably being used for
identification in the approach and departure area,
using transponders.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
45 words
Airport surface movement guidance and control
system according to one or more of the preceding
claims, characterized in that said system has a
multilateration system (e.g. CAPTS) which uses
multilateration of the signal arrival times to
determine exact position with simultaneous
identification using transponder squitters.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
46 words
Airport surface movement guidance and control
system according to Claim 4 or 5, characterized in
that, on detection by the primary radar, the
identification of the detected aircraft is carried out
with the aid of data sources, and is displayed while
being retained in the system.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
62 words
Airport surface movement guidance and control
system according to one or more of the preceding
claims, characterized in that said system has a taxiing
movement planning component, by means of which, taking
account of the respective landing direction, collision-free
taxiing traffic and other surface movement is
planned, taking account of the necessary safety
separations, as a function of the weather category
(CATI-III).
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
35 words
Airport surface movement guidance and control
system according to Claim 7, characterized in that the
monitor is also designed to display windows with status
displays, handover displays, particularly in line form
and acknowledgement lines, etc.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
51 words
Airport surface movement guidance and control
system according to Claim 7, characterized in that the
taxiway lighting sections, the stop bars and all the
other signalling devices which are necessary to control
surface movement, and their switching state can be
displayed, in particular linked to other safety-relevant
information, in said system.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
57 words
Airport surface movement guidance and control
system according to one or more of the preceding
claims, characterized in that the data which are
detected in the system can be split between one or more
controller locations and can be processed on the basis
of the respective responsibility, depending on the
respective amount of traffic at the airport.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
36 words
Airport surface movement guidance and control
system according to Claim 9 or 10, characterized in
that the handover of responsibility takes place after a
handover acknowledgement in window displays on the
monitor or on auxiliary monitors.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
75 words
Airport surface movement guidance and control
system according to Claim 8, 9, 10 or 11, characterized
in that the handover of responsibility takes place from
the approach area to the runway control area via the
taxiway control area to the apron control area and, in
the reverse sequence for departure, by regrouping electronic
flight strips (stripless) and designating the
respective responsibility in monitor windows, possibly
in conjunction with the radar video or a synthetic
display.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
93 words
Airport surface movement guidance and control
system according to one or more of the preceding
claims, characterized in that the radar data, in
particular with plot-extraction, are processed,
together with the status of the taxiway, landing and
take-off runway lights as well as other sensor
components (or else transponders), possibly with the
aid of data fusion and sensor correlation, to produce a
standard format, in particular being completely
digitized, and are then output to the radar video or
are composed to form a complete synthetic display
and/or are output to other monitor displays.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
71 words
Airport surface movement guidance and control
system according to one of Claims 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 or
13, characterized in that the radar video, possibly
windows with status displays, handover lines and
acknowledgement lines etc., are displayed on a flat
screen having a screen diagonal of more than 19 inches
(flat panel) which is designed, in particular, as a
touchscreen with switching elements for airport
lighting, for voice communication etc.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim
58 words
Airport surface movement guidance and control
system according to one or more of the preceding
claims, characterized in that said system is supplied
with data relating to aircraft movements in the
airspace further away, possibly with approach and
departure positions, positions on the taxiway and,
possibly, in the parking area being determined by GPS,
in particular differential GPS.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim
45 words
Airport surface movement guidance and control
system according to one or more of the preceding
claims, characterized in that said system has a
maintenance computer with a monitor on which the
necessary maintenance and repair tasks, possibly as
well as light failures, can be displayed.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim
47 words
Airport surface movement guidance and control
system according to one or more of the preceding
claims, characterized in that the lights of the airport
lighting system are designed such that they can be
addressed individually, and, for this purpose, are
equipped with EPROMs, in particular EEPROMs/flash
PROMs.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim
45 words
Airport surface movement guidance and control
system according to one or more of the preceding
claims, characterized in that said system has an
airport data transmission system which operates using
glass-fibre transmission technology, coaxial cables
and/or twisted pair cables, in particular of a
redundant design.
Claim 19
Dependent Claim
62 words
Airport surface movement guidance and control
system according to one or more of the preceding
claims, characterized in that said system has an
automatic docking system which operates in particular
with optical detection, for example via raster cameras
or laser ranging and detection, for determining the
aircraft position, possibly with the assistance of a
transponder identification system for the optically
detected aircraft.
Claim 20
Dependent Claim
41 words
Airport surface movement guidance and control
system according to Claim 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 18 or 19,
characterized in that the position data supplied from
the docking system are introduced into the data fusion
and sensor correlation, and vice versa.
Claim 21
Dependent Claim
39 words
Airport surface movement guidance and control
system according to Claim 18 or 19, characterized in
that the selection, occupancy and status messages for
parking positions are produced on the basis of flight
plans, and are displayed on the monitors.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
No citation records indexed.
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
Maintenance schedule is calculated for granted US utility patents.